What muscle relaxer has the least cardiovascular risks?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Muscle Relaxer with Least Cardiovascular Risk

Metaxalone appears to be the muscle relaxer with the least cardiovascular risk, as it lacks the documented cardiovascular adverse effects associated with other agents in this class.

Cardiovascular Risk Profile by Agent

Metaxalone (Lowest Risk)

  • Does not have documented cardiovascular adverse effects 1
  • Primary concerns are CNS effects (drowsiness, dizziness, irritability) and contraindications in hepatic/renal dysfunction 1
  • No mention of cardiac complications in guideline safety profiles 1

Cyclobenzaprine (Low-Moderate Risk)

  • No direct cardiovascular toxicity documented in major guidelines 1
  • Primary adverse effects are anticholinergic (dry mouth) and CNS sedation 2, 3
  • Sedation occurs in >30% of patients due to histamine H1 receptor antagonism 3
  • Well-tolerated overall with reasonable safety profile 4, 5
  • Avoid in elderly due to anticholinergic effects per Beers Criteria 1

Methocarbamol (Moderate Risk)

  • Documented cardiovascular effects including bradycardia and hypotension 1
  • Can be administered IV or orally, which may increase cardiovascular monitoring needs 1
  • CNS effects include drowsiness and dizziness 1

Orphenadrine (Highest Risk)

  • Should be used with caution in patients with tachycardia, cardiac decompensation, coronary insufficiency, and cardiac arrhythmias 1
  • Significant anticholinergic properties causing cardiovascular instability 1
  • Structurally similar to diphenhydramine with pronounced anticholinergic symptoms 1
  • Particularly problematic in elderly patients 1

Tizanidine (Moderate Risk)

  • Efficacious for acute low back pain in 8 trials 1
  • Associated with more dry mouth than baclofen but less weakness 6
  • No specific cardiovascular warnings in reviewed guidelines, but alpha-2 agonist mechanism can affect blood pressure 6

Carisoprodol (Moderate-High Risk)

  • Metabolized to meprobamate (a scheduled drug) 1
  • Effective for musculoskeletal conditions but carries abuse potential 6
  • Avoid in elderly per Beers Criteria 1

Clinical Algorithm for Selection

For patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors:

  1. First choice: Metaxalone - no documented cardiovascular effects 1
  2. Second choice: Cyclobenzaprine 5mg TID - no cardiac toxicity, lower sedation than 10mg dose 2
  3. Avoid: Orphenadrine and methocarbamol - documented cardiovascular adverse effects 1

For elderly patients (≥65 years):

  • All muscle relaxants should be avoided per AGS Beers Criteria due to increased risk of falls, fractures, and cognitive impairment 1
  • If absolutely necessary, metaxalone remains the safest cardiovascular option 1

Duration considerations:

  • All muscle relaxants should be limited to short-term use (≤2 weeks) 1
  • Evidence for chronic use is sparse and not recommended 1

Important Caveats

  • All muscle relaxants increase CNS adverse events (sedation, dizziness) compared to placebo (RR 2.04) 1
  • Perioperative management: Hold all muscle relaxants on day of surgery 1
  • Hepatotoxicity risk: Dantrolene carries black box warning; chlorzoxazone and tizanidine associated with usually reversible hepatotoxicity 1, 6
  • No muscle relaxant has proven superiority over others for efficacy in musculoskeletal conditions 1, 6
  • Cyclobenzaprine 5mg TID is as effective as 10mg TID with lower sedation rates 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.