What type of study is it when two groups of children are divided into those who watch TV for 2 hours daily (Group A) and those who do not watch TV (Group B)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Study Design Classification

This is a cohort study (Option A). The scenario describes dividing children into two groups based on their exposure status (TV watching vs. no TV watching) and would typically involve following them forward in time to observe outcomes.

Key Features That Define This as a Cohort Study

  • Exposure-based grouping: Participants are classified according to their exposure status—Group A (watches TV 2 hours daily) versus Group B (does not watch TV)—which is the fundamental characteristic of cohort design 1, 2.

  • Temporal sequence: In a cohort study, participants do not have the outcome of interest at baseline; they are selected based on exposure status and then followed over time to evaluate for occurrence of outcomes 1.

  • Forward direction: Cohort studies track groups forward from exposure to outcome, establishing clear temporality between exposure and disease 2.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Not a Case-Control Study (Option B)

  • Case-control studies work in the opposite direction—they start with individuals who already have the outcome (cases) and those who don't (controls), then look backward to assess past exposures 2.
  • The question describes grouping by exposure (TV watching), not by outcome status.

Not a Cross-Sectional Study (Option C)

  • Cross-sectional studies assess exposure and outcome simultaneously at a single point in time 3.
  • The described scenario involves grouping based on ongoing exposure behavior (daily TV watching), which implies a longitudinal follow-up component typical of cohort studies 1, 4.

Not a Randomized Controlled Trial (Option D)

  • RCTs involve random assignment of participants to intervention groups 1.
  • The question describes observational grouping based on existing TV-watching behavior, not randomized allocation.

Clinical Context

Cohort studies are particularly well-suited for studying the effects of TV exposure in children because they allow researchers to establish temporal relationships between screen time and developmental or health outcomes 5. The longitudinal nature permits assessment of multiple outcomes following a single exposure, making this design efficient for examining various effects of TV watching on child development 2, 4.

References

Research

Methodology Series Module 1: Cohort Studies.

Indian journal of dermatology, 2016

Research

Cohort studies: marching towards outcomes.

Lancet (London, England), 2002

Research

The cross-sectional cohort study: an underutilized design.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2005

Research

Research Design: Cohort Studies.

Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.