Management of Patients with Elevated RCRI Risk Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery
For patients with elevated RCRI scores (≥2), proceed directly to surgery if functional capacity is good (≥4 METs), but consider pharmacological stress testing only if functional capacity is poor or unknown AND results would change management decisions. 1
Risk Stratification Based on RCRI Score
Low Risk (RCRI 0-1)
- Patients can proceed directly to surgery without additional cardiac testing, as predicted major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk is <1% 2
- No further preoperative cardiac evaluation is needed unless specific symptoms or clinical changes warrant assessment 1
Elevated Risk (RCRI ≥2)
- Management is determined primarily by functional capacity assessment, not by RCRI score alone 1, 2
- The key decision point is whether the patient can achieve ≥4 METs of activity 2, 3
Functional Capacity-Based Algorithm for Elevated Risk Patients
Excellent Functional Capacity (>10 METs)
- Proceed directly to surgery without further testing 1
- This represents Class IIa recommendation with Level B evidence 1
Moderate to Good Functional Capacity (4-10 METs)
- It is reasonable to forgo further exercise testing and proceed to surgery 1
- This represents Class IIb recommendation with Level B evidence 1
Poor or Unknown Functional Capacity (<4 METs or unknown)
- Pharmacological stress testing (dobutamine stress echo or myocardial perfusion imaging) is reasonable ONLY if results will change management 1
- This represents Class IIa recommendation with Level B evidence 1
- Management changes include: coronary revascularization, medication adjustments, or surgical cancellation 3
- If testing won't alter the surgical plan, proceed without testing 1
Preoperative Testing Recommendations
12-Lead ECG
- Reasonable for patients with known coronary heart disease or significant structural heart disease (except low-risk surgery) 1, 2
- Not useful for asymptomatic patients undergoing low-risk procedures 1
Left Ventricular Function Assessment
- Reasonable for patients with dyspnea of unknown origin 1
- Reasonable for heart failure patients with worsening dyspnea or clinical status change 1
- Routine evaluation of LV function is NOT recommended without specific indications 1, 2
Stress Testing Contraindications
- Routine screening with noninvasive stress testing is NOT useful for low-risk noncardiac surgery 1
- Routine preoperative coronary angiography is NOT recommended 1
Coronary Revascularization Considerations
Routine coronary revascularization before noncardiac surgery exclusively to reduce perioperative cardiac events is NOT recommended 1
Limited Indications for Preoperative PCI:
- Left main disease when comorbidities preclude bypass surgery 1
- Unstable coronary artery disease requiring emergency/urgent revascularization 1
- ST-elevation MI or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome benefiting from early invasive management 1
Timing Considerations:
- If drug-eluting stent placed, elective noncardiac surgery may be considered after 180 days 1
- For time-sensitive surgery, consider balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stent 1
Perioperative Medical Management
Beta-Blockers
- Continue in patients already on chronic beta-blocker therapy (Class I recommendation) 2, 4
- For RCRI ≥2 patients not on beta-blockers, it may be reasonable to begin before surgery, preferably >1 day before to assess tolerability 2
- Monitor for hypotension, bradycardia, or bleeding postoperatively 2
Statins
- Continue in patients currently taking statins (Class I recommendation) 2
ACE Inhibitors/ARBs
- Continuation is reasonable perioperatively (Class IIa recommendation) 2, 4
- In select patients with controlled blood pressure undergoing elevated-risk surgery, omission 24 hours before surgery may be beneficial to limit intraoperative hypotension (Class IIb recommendation) 4
- Restart as soon as clinically feasible postoperatively if held 4
Enhanced Risk Stratification Options
Biomarker Assessment
- NT-proBNP and/or troponin measurement preoperatively may be reasonable for additional risk stratification in patients with RCRI ≥2 (Class IIa recommendation) 2, 3
- Combination improves discrimination with median delta c-statistic of 0.12 3
Alternative Risk Calculators
- Consider the Gupta MICA calculator for superior predictive discrimination compared to RCRI, particularly in broader surgical populations 3
- For thoracic surgery specifically, consider the Thoracic RCRI (ThRCRI) instead of standard RCRI 2, 3
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
RCRI Limitations
- RCRI substantially underestimates cardiac risk in vascular surgery patients, with actual event rates 1.7- to 7.4-fold higher than predicted 5
- 35% of cardiac complications occur in patients with RCRI score of 0, highlighting the need for systematic troponin monitoring regardless of score 6
- RCRI has only moderate discriminative ability (C-statistic 0.65-0.69) 6
Testing Pitfalls
- Do not order stress testing unless abnormal results would lead to specific management changes (revascularization, medication changes, or surgical cancellation) 3
- Emergency surgery increases cardiac risk regardless of RCRI score; focus on immediate perioperative optimization rather than extensive testing 3