What is the workup for gallstones?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Workup for Gallstones

Begin with transabdominal ultrasound and liver function tests as your first-line diagnostic approach for suspected gallstone disease. 1, 2

Initial Diagnostic Evaluation

Clinical Presentation to Assess

  • Right upper quadrant or epigastric pain (sudden onset, often postprandial) 3
  • Murphy sign on physical examination (specific for acute cholecystitis) 3
  • Jaundice, fever, or signs of cholangitis (indicating potential complications) 1
  • History of pancreatitis (gallstones cause up to 50% of acute pancreatitis cases) 1

First-Line Laboratory Tests

  • Liver function tests including bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, and GGT 1, 2
  • Complete blood count 2
  • Lipase or amylase (if pancreatitis suspected) 4
  • Important caveat: Normal LFTs do not exclude gallstone disease or common bile duct stones (CBDS), as only 15% PPV for CBDS with abnormal LFTs 1

First-Line Imaging

  • Transabdominal ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice 1, 2, 3
    • Sensitivity: 79% for acute cholecystitis 5, 25-63% for CBDS 4
    • Specificity: 87% for detecting cholelithiasis 5
    • Limitation: Poor visualization of distal common bile duct and operator-dependent 4

Risk Stratification for Common Bile Duct Stones

If gallstones are confirmed, immediately stratify the patient's risk for CBDS using the following criteria: 1

Very Strong Risk Factors (High Risk)

  • CBDS visualized on ultrasound 1
  • Ascending cholangitis (fever, jaundice, right upper quadrant pain) 1

Strong Risk Factors (Intermediate Risk)

  • Common bile duct diameter >6 mm (with gallbladder in situ) 1
  • Total serum bilirubin >1.8 mg/dL 1

Moderate Risk Factors (Intermediate Risk)

  • Abnormal liver biochemistry (other than bilirubin) 1
  • Age >55 years 1
  • Clinical gallstone pancreatitis 1

Advanced Imaging Based on CBDS Risk

Low Risk (No Predictors Present)

  • Consider alternative diagnosis 1
  • No further biliary imaging needed unless symptoms persist 1

Intermediate Risk (Moderate Risk Factors Only)

  • Obtain MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) 1
    • MRCP: Sensitivity 93%, specificity 96% for CBDS 1
    • EUS: Sensitivity 95%, specificity 97% for CBDS 1
    • MRCP is preferred as first-line due to non-invasive nature, wide availability, and ability to image intrahepatic ducts 1, 4
    • EUS may be chosen based on local expertise, patient factors (claustrophobia, pacemakers), or need for tissue diagnosis 1

High Risk (Very Strong Risk Factors Present)

  • Proceed directly to ERCP (therapeutic intent) or consider intraoperative cholangiography (IOC)/laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) at time of surgery 1
  • ERCP: Sensitivity 83%, specificity 99% 1
  • IOC: Sensitivity 99%, specificity 99% 1
  • Important caveat: ERCP carries 1-2% complication rate (pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation), increasing to 10% with sphincterotomy 1

Special Imaging Considerations

When CT May Be Obtained Instead

  • CT is more sensitive than ultrasound for acute cholecystitis (92% vs 79% sensitivity) but less sensitive for cholelithiasis (60% vs 87%) 5
  • CT is often the first test obtained in emergency settings when diagnosis is unclear 5
  • Use CT when evaluating for complications (perforation, abscess) or alternative diagnoses 4

When to Use HIDA Scan

  • Obtain hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan when ultrasound is negative or equivocal but clinical suspicion for acute cholecystitis remains high 3
  • Sensitivity: 84-89%, specificity: 67-79% for acute cholecystitis 1

When to Use Functional Testing

  • Cholecystokinin-cholescintigraphy (CCK-CS) with gallbladder ejection fraction calculation for suspected biliary dyskinesia 2
  • Abnormal if ejection fraction <38% at 60 minutes 2
  • Avoid in hospitalized or acutely ill patients (high false positive rate) 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on elevated LFTs to diagnose CBDS—15-50% of acute cholecystitis patients have elevated LFTs without CBDS 1
  • Do not skip further imaging in intermediate-risk patients—proceeding directly to ERCP results in 30-75% unnecessary procedures 1
  • Do not delay MRCP/EUS in favor of diagnostic ERCP unless patient has high-risk features requiring immediate therapeutic intervention 1, 4
  • Normal ultrasound does not exclude CBDS or cholecystitis if clinical suspicion remains high 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Gallbladder Disease Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Gallstone Disease: Common Questions and Answers.

American family physician, 2024

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Bile and Pancreatic Duct Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.