Workup for Gallstones
Begin with transabdominal ultrasound and liver function tests as your first-line diagnostic approach for suspected gallstone disease. 1, 2
Initial Diagnostic Evaluation
Clinical Presentation to Assess
- Right upper quadrant or epigastric pain (sudden onset, often postprandial) 3
- Murphy sign on physical examination (specific for acute cholecystitis) 3
- Jaundice, fever, or signs of cholangitis (indicating potential complications) 1
- History of pancreatitis (gallstones cause up to 50% of acute pancreatitis cases) 1
First-Line Laboratory Tests
- Liver function tests including bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, and GGT 1, 2
- Complete blood count 2
- Lipase or amylase (if pancreatitis suspected) 4
- Important caveat: Normal LFTs do not exclude gallstone disease or common bile duct stones (CBDS), as only 15% PPV for CBDS with abnormal LFTs 1
First-Line Imaging
Risk Stratification for Common Bile Duct Stones
If gallstones are confirmed, immediately stratify the patient's risk for CBDS using the following criteria: 1
Very Strong Risk Factors (High Risk)
Strong Risk Factors (Intermediate Risk)
Moderate Risk Factors (Intermediate Risk)
- Abnormal liver biochemistry (other than bilirubin) 1
- Age >55 years 1
- Clinical gallstone pancreatitis 1
Advanced Imaging Based on CBDS Risk
Low Risk (No Predictors Present)
Intermediate Risk (Moderate Risk Factors Only)
- Obtain MRCP or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) 1
- MRCP: Sensitivity 93%, specificity 96% for CBDS 1
- EUS: Sensitivity 95%, specificity 97% for CBDS 1
- MRCP is preferred as first-line due to non-invasive nature, wide availability, and ability to image intrahepatic ducts 1, 4
- EUS may be chosen based on local expertise, patient factors (claustrophobia, pacemakers), or need for tissue diagnosis 1
High Risk (Very Strong Risk Factors Present)
- Proceed directly to ERCP (therapeutic intent) or consider intraoperative cholangiography (IOC)/laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) at time of surgery 1
- ERCP: Sensitivity 83%, specificity 99% 1
- IOC: Sensitivity 99%, specificity 99% 1
- Important caveat: ERCP carries 1-2% complication rate (pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation), increasing to 10% with sphincterotomy 1
Special Imaging Considerations
When CT May Be Obtained Instead
- CT is more sensitive than ultrasound for acute cholecystitis (92% vs 79% sensitivity) but less sensitive for cholelithiasis (60% vs 87%) 5
- CT is often the first test obtained in emergency settings when diagnosis is unclear 5
- Use CT when evaluating for complications (perforation, abscess) or alternative diagnoses 4
When to Use HIDA Scan
- Obtain hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan when ultrasound is negative or equivocal but clinical suspicion for acute cholecystitis remains high 3
- Sensitivity: 84-89%, specificity: 67-79% for acute cholecystitis 1
When to Use Functional Testing
- Cholecystokinin-cholescintigraphy (CCK-CS) with gallbladder ejection fraction calculation for suspected biliary dyskinesia 2
- Abnormal if ejection fraction <38% at 60 minutes 2
- Avoid in hospitalized or acutely ill patients (high false positive rate) 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on elevated LFTs to diagnose CBDS—15-50% of acute cholecystitis patients have elevated LFTs without CBDS 1
- Do not skip further imaging in intermediate-risk patients—proceeding directly to ERCP results in 30-75% unnecessary procedures 1
- Do not delay MRCP/EUS in favor of diagnostic ERCP unless patient has high-risk features requiring immediate therapeutic intervention 1, 4
- Normal ultrasound does not exclude CBDS or cholecystitis if clinical suspicion remains high 1, 2