Is cefoperazone (a cephalosporin antibiotic) / sulbactam (a beta-lactamase inhibitor) a good choice for treating bacterial infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is Cefoperazone-Sulbactam a Good Choice for Bacterial Infections?

Cefoperazone-sulbactam is a good choice for specific clinical scenarios, particularly for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections and as an alternative to piperacillin-tazobactam for gram-negative nosocomial infections, but it requires metronidazole for adequate anaerobic coverage in intra-abdominal infections.

Primary Indications Where Cefoperazone-Sulbactam Excels

CRAB Infections (Strongest Evidence)

  • For CRAB bloodstream infections, cefoperazone-sulbactam demonstrates significantly lower 28-day mortality (29.3%) compared to tigecycline (51.9%, P = 0.001) 1
  • Sulbactam-containing regimens are specifically recommended by 2023 guidelines for CRAB infections, with the combination showing superior pathogen eradication rates compared to polymyxin plus tigecycline or monotherapy 1
  • In Asian countries, particularly China, cefoperazone-sulbactam is preferred over ampicillin-sulbactam due to better susceptibility patterns (resistance rates 48.8% vs 59.1%) 1
  • High-dose sulbactam (≥6 g/day) combined with tigecycline or levofloxacin achieves higher clinical cure rates than other regimens for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter 1

Gram-Negative Nosocomial Infections

  • Cefoperazone-sulbactam has equivalent efficacy and safety to piperacillin-tazobactam for empirical treatment of gram-negative nosocomial infections, with similar treatment success rates (50% vs 51.2%, p = 0.18) and 28-day mortality (46.1% vs 42.8%, p = 0.56) 2
  • This equivalence makes it an appropriate alternative for antibiotic cycling or mixing strategies to reduce resistance 2
  • The combination is effective against beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, with susceptibility increasing from 88.6% to 96.3% when sulbactam is added 3

Community-Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infections (With Important Caveat)

  • For mild-to-moderate community-acquired intra-abdominal infections, ampicillin-sulbactam (the related compound) is listed as a reasonable option in guidelines 1
  • Critical caveat: Cefoperazone-sulbactam has limited activity against Bacteroides species and MUST be combined with metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections 4
  • This is analogous to ceftazidime, which has no anaerobic activity and requires metronidazole addition 5

Clinical Scenarios Where It Should NOT Be First-Line

High-Risk or Nosocomial Intra-Abdominal Infections

  • For higher-risk patients (APACHE II ≥15) or nosocomial postoperative infections requiring Pseudomonas coverage, broader-spectrum agents like meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, or piperacillin-tazobactam are preferred 1
  • Piperacillin-tazobactam has the advantage of not requiring metronidazole for anaerobic coverage 5

Gram-Positive Coverage Limitations

  • Like ceftazidime, cefoperazone has poor activity against gram-positive cocci including viridans streptococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and MRSA 5
  • If MRSA or enterococcal coverage is needed (common in nosocomial infections), additional agents like vancomycin must be added 1

Practical Implementation Algorithm

For CRAB infections:

  • Use cefoperazone-sulbactam as preferred agent, especially in Asian settings 1
  • Consider combination with imipenem-cilastatin for improved mortality outcomes 1
  • Dose sulbactam at 6-9 g/day for severe infections 1

For gram-negative nosocomial infections:

  • Cefoperazone-sulbactam is equivalent to piperacillin-tazobactam 2
  • Use 2-4 g/day divided every 12 hours 6
  • Consider as alternative for antibiotic stewardship cycling 2

For intra-abdominal infections:

  • ALWAYS add metronidazole for anaerobic coverage 4
  • Reserve for mild-to-moderate community-acquired cases 1
  • For high-risk patients, choose broader-spectrum alternatives 1

Safety Profile and Monitoring

  • Generally well tolerated with efficacy rates of 95% in moderate-to-severe infections 6
  • Monitor for prolonged prothrombin time (19.4% incidence vs 6.4% with piperacillin-tazobactam, P = 0.001) 2
  • Diarrhea and skin rashes are most common side effects 7
  • Contraindicated in penicillin-hypersensitive patients 1

Resistance Considerations

  • Sulbactam has high affinity for TEM-1 and TEM-2 beta-lactamases (≥10-fold higher than cefoperazone alone), making it effective against plasmid-mediated resistance 3
  • Bacterial eradication rates of 85% for beta-lactamase-producing organisms 6
  • Like other extended-spectrum cephalosporins, prolonged use may select for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Ceftazidima-Avibactam para Infecciones Intraabdominales

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Antimicrobial Therapy with Ceftazidime and Piperacillin/Tazobactam

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Sulbactam/cefoperazone versus cefotaxime for the treatment of moderate-to-severe bacterial infections: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.