What is the risk of cancer recurrence in a patient with stage three T4 N1 (tumor size and lymph node involvement) cancer after undergoing a bilobectomy (surgical removal of two lobes of an organ)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Cancer Recurrence in Stage III T4 N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Bilobectomy

For a patient with stage III T4 N1 non-small cell lung cancer who has undergone bilobectomy, the risk of recurrence is substantial, with approximately 60-80% experiencing disease recurrence within 5 years, and the 5-year overall survival ranging from 13-40% depending on completeness of resection and specific tumor characteristics. 1

Understanding Your Specific Risk Profile

T4 N1 Disease Characteristics

  • T4 N1 disease represents locally advanced cancer with limited nodal involvement, placing you in an intermediate-to-high risk category for recurrence 1
  • The 5-year survival for T4 N0 disease is approximately 39-46%, but N1 involvement reduces this to approximately 15-17% in historical series 1, 2
  • Patients with T4 disease who undergo complete resection (R0) have significantly better outcomes than those with incomplete resection, with 5-year survival of 36-54% versus near 0% respectively 1, 2

Bilobectomy-Specific Considerations

  • Bilobectomy itself carries higher operative mortality (8.7% within 30 days, 13% within 90 days) and worse long-term outcomes compared to lobectomy 3
  • The 5-year survival after bilobectomy for lung cancer ranges from 42-58% overall, but drops significantly for stage III disease to approximately 13-40% 4, 5
  • Upper-middle bilobectomy has worse survival outcomes than middle-lower bilobectomy 4, 5

Pattern and Timing of Recurrence

Where Recurrence Occurs

  • Approximately 82% of recurrences in completely resected lung cancer occur at distant sites (50% distant only, 32% both locoregional and distant) 6
  • Locoregional disease is the most common form of relapse in T4 tumors, particularly when complete resection is not achieved 1
  • Only 18% of recurrences are purely locoregional 6

When Recurrence Occurs

  • The median time from resection to recurrence is approximately 18.8 months (range 10.6-30.7 months) 6
  • The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence for stage I-II disease is 20%, but this is substantially higher for stage III T4 N1 disease 6
  • Most recurrences manifest within the first 2-3 years after surgery 6

Critical Prognostic Factors That Affect Your Risk

Factors Associated with Better Outcomes

  • Complete resection with negative margins (R0) is the single most important factor—5-year survival of 54% with R0 versus near 0% with incomplete resection 1
  • Absence of mediastinal (N2) lymph node involvement—your N1 status is more favorable than N2 (5-year survival 70% for N0, 17% for N1, versus 0-9% for N2) 1
  • Upper lobe or main stem bronchus location is more favorable than lower lobe tumors 2
  • Squamous cell histology has better survival (54%) than adenocarcinoma (32%) after bilobectomy 5

Factors Associated with Worse Outcomes

  • Upper-middle bilobectomy has significantly worse survival than middle-lower bilobectomy 4, 5
  • Extended resection procedures adversely affect survival 4
  • Involvement of both superior and inferior mediastinal lymph nodes dramatically worsens prognosis 2
  • Lower lobe tumor location is associated with worse outcomes 2

Treatment Implications for Reducing Recurrence Risk

Adjuvant Therapy Considerations

  • Patients with T4 N0,1 disease benefit from preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy, with 5-year survival improving from 20% to 40-54% with complete resection after neoadjuvant therapy 1
  • If you did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy should be strongly considered given your stage III disease 1
  • The American College of Chest Physicians recommends that patients with T4 N0,1 disease be treated at specialized centers with experience in managing these complex cases 1

Surveillance Strategy

  • Given that 82% of recurrences are at distant sites, systemic surveillance with imaging is critical 6
  • Extrathoracic imaging (head CT/MRI plus either whole-body PET or abdominal CT plus bone scan) should be performed as part of follow-up 1
  • Most intensive surveillance should occur in the first 2-3 years when recurrence risk is highest 6

Survival Expectations After Recurrence

Prognosis Based on Recurrence Site

  • For stage II disease with recurrence: median survival is 63 months for locoregional, 23.1 months for distant, and 9.8 months for both sites 6
  • For stage I disease with recurrence: median survival is 28.9 months for locoregional, 8.7 months for distant, and 10.2 months for both sites 6
  • Stage III disease with recurrence has even worse outcomes, with most patients surviving less than 2 years after recurrence detection 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Underestimating recurrence risk: T4 N1 disease has substantially higher recurrence rates than earlier stages, and bilobectomy itself is associated with worse outcomes than lobectomy 3, 4
  • Inadequate surveillance: Given the high rate of distant recurrence, limiting surveillance to chest imaging alone misses the majority of recurrences 6
  • Delayed adjuvant therapy: If adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated, delays beyond 8-12 weeks post-surgery may compromise effectiveness 1
  • Assuming N1 is low-risk: While better than N2, N1 involvement still significantly increases recurrence risk compared to N0 disease 1, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.