What are the different types of forcep (forceps) delivery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Forceps Delivery

Forceps deliveries are classified into three main types based on fetal head station and position: outlet forceps, low forceps (non-rotational), and mid-pelvic forceps (rotational), with rotational forceps (such as Kielland's) requiring the most skill but offering safe management of persistent fetal malposition when performed by experienced operators. 1, 2

Classification by Station and Rotation

Outlet Forceps Delivery

  • Applied when the fetal scalp is visible at the introitus without separating the labia, the skull has reached the pelvic floor, and the sagittal suture is in the anteroposterior diameter or right/left occiput anterior or posterior position (rotation does not exceed 45 degrees) 3
  • This represents the lowest-risk forceps application with minimal maternal and neonatal complications 4
  • Does not significantly shorten the second stage of labor compared to spontaneous delivery, but is associated with increased maternal perineal trauma, particularly episiotomy (93% vs 78%) and deep perineal lacerations (24% vs 10%) in nulliparous women 4

Low Forceps (Non-Rotational) Delivery

  • Applied when the fetal head is at station +2 cm or more and not on the pelvic floor 1, 3
  • Rotation does not exceed 45 degrees from the occiput anterior position 3
  • Associated with lower failure rates compared to vacuum extraction, making it the preferred operative vaginal method when the fetal head is palpable in the vagina 1, 5
  • Carries higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage (4.3%) compared to cesarean section (0.6%), but lower rates of maternal infection (2.2% vs 4.7%) 6
  • When performed for fetal indications, achieves faster delivery (12.3 ± 3.5 minutes vs 19.1 ± 5.0 minutes for cesarean) and lower rates of perinatal mortality/hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (0.5% vs 1.9%) 6

Mid-Pelvic Rotational Forceps (Kielland's) Delivery

  • Applied when the fetal head is engaged but the leading bony point is above station +2 cm, requiring rotation of more than 45 degrees to achieve occiput anterior position 3, 2
  • Kielland's forceps are specifically designed for rotation with minimal pelvic curve, allowing safe rotation of malpositioned fetal heads 7, 2
  • Requires experienced operators and appropriate patient selection, with supervision essential during resident training 7
  • Associated with longer labor (671 ± 285.8 minutes vs 614 ± 226.5 minutes) and longer second stage (184 ± 74.71 minutes vs 161 ± 65.79 minutes) compared to non-rotational forceps 7
  • Carries higher rates of one-minute Apgar scores <6 (18.2% vs 4.7%) and meconium at delivery (14.5% vs 5.6%) compared to non-rotational forceps 7

Comparative Safety Profile

Kielland's vs Other Delivery Methods

  • No significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage rates compared to rotational ventouse delivery 2
  • Lower postpartum hemorrhage rates compared to non-rotational forceps (RR 0.79,95% CI 0.65-0.95) and second-stage cesarean section (RR 0.45,95% CI 0.36-0.58) 2
  • Higher shoulder dystocia rates compared to ventouse delivery (RR 1.79,95% CI 1.08-2.98), but lower neonatal birth trauma rates (RR 0.49,95% CI 0.26-0.91) 2
  • No differences in anal sphincter injuries or NICU admission rates across delivery methods 2
  • Lower 5-minute Apgar scores <7 compared to second-stage cesarean section (RR 0.47,95% CI 0.23-0.97) 2

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

When to Choose Forceps Over Cesarean

  • Proceed with operative vaginal delivery when the fetal head is palpable in the vagina during second stage labor with Category 2 CTG, as this minimizes maternal and neonatal morbidity compared to cesarean section at full dilation 1
  • Cesarean section at full dilation with deeply engaged fetal head carries substantially higher maternal morbidity, including impacted fetal head complications in up to 10% of cases, with risks of uterine incision extensions, hemorrhage, and bladder/ureteric injuries 1

Forceps vs Ventouse Selection

  • Both are acceptable when the head is palpable in the vagina 1
  • Forceps provide more controlled traction and have lower failure rates 1, 3
  • Ventouse is gentler on maternal tissues but requires more application time and has higher failure rates 1
  • Vacuum extraction should be avoided at low station due to increased risk of intracranial and subgaleal hemorrhage 5

Critical Prevention Measures

Avoiding Facial Nerve Injury

  • Never use a single forceps blade as a lever during delivery, as this is the primary mechanism of facial nerve paralysis 8
  • The facial nerve exits the skull base through the stylomastoid foramen before branching, making it vulnerable to compression from improper forceps technique 8
  • Proper training in forceps application techniques is essential, with high-fidelity simulation training recommended for difficult deliveries 8

Special Populations

  • In patients with skeletal dysplasia, operative delivery should be avoided when possible due to C1-C2 instability concerns present in approximately 25% of cases 9
  • For osteogenesis imperfecta, cesarean delivery does not decrease fracture rates and should only be performed for standard maternal or fetal indications 9

Management of Failed Forceps Delivery

  • If forceps delivery fails, proceed immediately to cesarean section rather than attempting vacuum extraction 5
  • Prepare for manual vaginal disimpaction or reverse breech extraction to manage impacted fetal head 1
  • Administer uterine tocolysis to relax the uterus and facilitate disimpaction 1
  • Avoid attempting delivery during contractions, as this exacerbates difficulty 1

References

Guideline

Operative Vaginal Delivery with Forceps or Ventouse

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2019

Guideline

Management of Preterm Labor at 33 Weeks

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with forceps delivery versus cesarean delivery.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2020

Research

Kielland vs. nonrotational forceps for the second stage of labor.

The Journal of reproductive medicine, 1999

Guideline

Facial Nerve Paralysis Following Forceps Delivery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What are the long-term effects on the neonate (newborn) and mother following a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery?
What are the indications for Luikart (obstetric) forceps?
What is the best course of action for a pregnant woman at 33 weeks gestation, vitally stable, in labor, with the fetus's head in the vaginal canal, and a category 2 cardiotocography (CTG) tracing, considering options like ventouse (vacuum-assisted) delivery, forceps, and fetal blood sampling?
What increases the risk of fetal/neonatal injury during assisted vaginal birth: when the fetus is in a flexed attitude, there is sequential use of vacuum and then forceps, the operator has completed the Advanced Labour and Risk Management (ALARM) course, or the patient has been in the second stage of labor for more than 90 minutes?
What defines a mid-forceps delivery: head visible at the perineum, head between station 0 to +2 cm, head above station 0, or head below +2 cm?
What are the stages of erythropoiesis (production of red blood cells) and can normoblasts be renewed?
What is the recommended first-line antibiotic regimen for the treatment of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP)?
What are the comparative risks of Risperidone (atypical antipsychotic) versus Haloperidol (typical antipsychotic) and Olanzapine (atypical antipsychotic)?
Can a patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) take clonidine?
What is the recommended treatment for a patient with acute ischemic stroke, history of Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM), and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) who is already on apixaban (eliquis) 5mg twice a day?
What is the best test besides colonoscopy (colonoscopy) to detect colon cancer?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.