Management of Low Alkaline Phosphatase in Adults
The primary concern with low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in adults is identifying hypophosphatasia (HPP), a rare genetic disorder that can cause debilitating musculoskeletal complications including pathologic fractures, and requires specific diagnostic confirmation before any treatment decisions, particularly avoiding bisphosphonates which may be harmful. 1, 2
Initial Diagnostic Approach
Confirm True Hypophosphatasemia
- Verify persistent low ALP with repeat measurement, as transient decreases may occur; obtain at least two measurements separated by 2-4 weeks to confirm chronicity 3
- Document the degree of ALP reduction below the lower limit of normal, as severity correlates with clinical manifestations and substrate accumulation 4, 5
Immediate Medication Review
- Stop bisphosphonates immediately if the patient is taking them, as these medications can cause low ALP and may be contraindicated in true HPP 3, 6
- Review for other medications that might lower ALP, particularly in patients over 60 years who are more susceptible to drug effects 7
Biochemical Workup to Diagnose Hypophosphatasia
Essential Laboratory Tests
- Measure serum pyridoxal-5-phosphate (PLP): elevated PLP (>50 μg/L) strongly supports HPP diagnosis, with 94-100% of HPP patients showing elevation 4, 5
- Measure urine phosphoethanolamine (PEA): elevated in 94% of HPP patients and correlates inversely with ALP levels 4, 5
- Obtain serum calcium and phosphate: mild hyperphosphatemia occurs in 21% and mild hypercalcemia in 7% of cases 5
- Check bone-specific alkaline phosphatase if available to confirm the deficiency is not isolated to liver isoenzyme 3
The combination of low ALP with elevated PLP and/or PEA is diagnostic of HPP, with approximately 50% of adults with unexplained low ALP carrying pathogenic ALPL mutations 5, 3
Clinical Assessment for HPP Manifestations
Key Historical Features to Elicit
- Musculoskeletal pain (present in 41% at diagnosis), particularly chronic, non-specific bone or joint pain 4
- Fracture history, especially atypical locations: subtrochanteric femur (more common in women), metatarsal stress fractures, hip/femoral neck, or wrist 4, 6
- History of childhood rickets or delayed walking 4
- Dental abnormalities: premature tooth loss in adults (48% with mutations versus 12% without), particularly loss of teeth with intact roots 4, 5
- Chondrocalcinosis or pseudogout episodes (27% have radiographic chondrocalcinosis, 14% have documented pyrophosphate arthropathy) 4
Physical Examination Findings
- Assess for short stature 6
- Examine for joint swelling suggesting chondrocalcinosis 4
- Document any skeletal deformities 1
- Evaluate dental status for premature tooth loss 5
Genetic Testing
- Obtain ALPL gene sequencing in patients with confirmed low ALP and elevated substrates (PLP or PEA) or suggestive clinical features 5, 3
- Approximately 50-67% of adults with persistent hypophosphatasemia carry pathogenic or likely pathogenic ALPL mutations 5, 3
- Most mutations are heterozygous missense mutations with damaging effects on protein activity 5
- Genetic confirmation is critical as it establishes definitive diagnosis, informs prognosis, and guides family counseling 3
Imaging Considerations
When to Obtain Bone Imaging
- Obtain skeletal radiographs if patient reports bone pain, has history of fractures, or has significantly low ALP (<50% of lower limit of normal) 4
- Consider bone density testing (DXA), though it may be normal in HPP despite fracture risk 6
- Iliac crest bone biopsy may show osteomalacia in symptomatic cases but is not routinely necessary if biochemical diagnosis is clear 4
Differential Diagnosis Considerations
- Hypophosphatasia must be distinguished from osteomalacia: osteomalacia shows elevated (not low) ALP, low phosphate, and low vitamin D 1
- Rule out malnutrition, zinc deficiency, and hypothyroidism as alternative causes of low ALP 2
- Consider Wilson disease in younger patients with low ALP and liver abnormalities 2
Management Approach
For Confirmed or Suspected HPP
Avoid bisphosphonates and denosumab, as these antiresorptive agents may worsen bone quality and increase atypical fracture risk in HPP 3, 6
Symptomatic Patients
- Refer to endocrinology or metabolic bone disease specialist for consideration of enzyme replacement therapy (asfotase alfa) in patients with significant symptoms, recurrent fractures, or disabling musculoskeletal pain 2
- Provide supportive care including physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain and mobility impairment 1
- Manage fractures with standard orthopedic approaches; intramedullary nailing has been successful for femoral fractures 6
- Address dental issues with appropriate dental care 5
Asymptomatic Patients or Mild Disease
- Monitor clinically with periodic assessment for development of symptoms, fractures, or dental problems 5
- Repeat biochemical testing (ALP, PLP, PEA) annually to track disease activity 3
- Counsel regarding fracture risk and importance of reporting new bone pain 4
- Avoid prescribing bisphosphonates even if osteoporosis is diagnosed by DXA, as these may be harmful 3, 6
For Low ALP Without HPP Features
If PLP and PEA are normal, genetic testing is negative, and no clinical features of HPP are present:
- Consider alternative causes: malnutrition, zinc deficiency, hypothyroidism, celiac disease, or Wilson disease 2
- Monitor ALP periodically (every 6-12 months) to ensure stability 7
- Document the finding clearly in the medical record to prevent inappropriate bisphosphonate prescription 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never prescribe bisphosphonates to patients with unexplained low ALP without first ruling out HPP, as these drugs may cause atypical fractures in HPP patients 3, 6
- Do not dismiss low ALP as clinically insignificant; approximately 50% harbor pathogenic mutations and may develop serious complications 5, 3
- Do not assume normal bone density on DXA excludes significant bone disease, as HPP patients may have normal or even elevated BMD despite fracture risk 6
- Recognize that many HPP patients have only mild, non-specific symptoms (musculoskeletal pain) that may be dismissed, but substrate accumulation and fracture risk persist 4, 5
- Women appear more susceptible to certain manifestations including metatarsal fractures and chondrocalcinosis, requiring gender-specific vigilance 4