What is the correct order of workup for a patient presenting with hematuria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hematuria Workup Algorithm for USMLE Step 2

The correct order of workup for hematuria follows a systematic approach: (1) confirm true hematuria with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 RBCs/HPF, (2) perform history/physical/labs to distinguish glomerular from non-glomerular sources, (3) conduct risk stratification for malignancy, and (4) proceed with appropriate imaging and cystoscopy based on risk category. 1, 2

Step 1: Confirm True Hematuria

  • Verify microscopic hematuria by demonstrating ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field on microscopic examination of at least two of three properly collected clean-catch midstream urine specimens 1, 2
  • Dipstick positivity alone is insufficient—specificity is only 65-99% and produces false positives from myoglobin, hemoglobin, menstruation, or vigorous exercise 1, 2
  • Critical pitfall: 0-2 RBCs/HPF is within normal limits and does not warrant urologic workup 1

Step 2: Initial Clinical Assessment

History and Physical Examination

  • Assess malignancy risk factors: age >35 years (especially >60 years), male sex, smoking history (quantify pack-years), occupational exposure to benzenes/aromatic amines/chemicals/dyes 1, 2
  • Identify benign causes to exclude: urinary tract infection, recent vigorous exercise, menstruation (repeat UA 48 hours after cessation), recent urologic procedures, trauma 1, 3
  • Evaluate for glomerular disease indicators: tea-colored urine, recent upper respiratory infection, family history of kidney disease, hearing loss (Alport syndrome) 1, 2
  • Document urologic symptoms: irritative voiding symptoms, flank pain, dysuria 1
  • Measure blood pressure at initial visit 2

Laboratory Evaluation

  • Complete urinalysis with microscopic sediment examination to assess RBC morphology: >80% dysmorphic RBCs or presence of red cell casts indicates glomerular source 1, 2
  • Serum creatinine and complete metabolic panel (BUN, albumin, total protein) to evaluate renal function 1, 2
  • Quantify proteinuria using spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (normal <0.2 g/g)—significant proteinuria strongly suggests glomerular disease 1, 2
  • Urine culture if infection suspected (preferably before antibiotics) 4, 1

Step 3: Determine Source (Glomerular vs. Non-Glomerular)

Glomerular Source Indicators → Nephrology Referral

  • 80% dysmorphic RBCs or red cell casts (pathognomonic for glomerular disease) 1, 2

  • Significant proteinuria (protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.2) with hematuria 1, 2
  • Elevated creatinine or declining renal function 1
  • Additional workup for glomerular source: complement levels (C3, C4), ANA, ANCA if vasculitis suspected, renal ultrasound to assess kidney size/echogenicity 1

Non-Glomerular Source → Urologic Evaluation

  • 80% normal (eumorphic) RBCs suggests lower urinary tract bleeding 1

  • Proceed to risk stratification for malignancy 2

Step 4: Risk Stratification for Malignancy (Non-Glomerular Hematuria)

Use the 2025 AUA/SUFU risk stratification system 2:

Low Risk (0%-0.4% malignancy risk)

  • Women <60 years, men <40 years
  • Never smoker or <10 pack-years
  • 3-10 RBCs/HPF
  • Workup: Renal ultrasound may be sufficient; cystoscopy optional 2

Intermediate Risk (0.2%-3.1% malignancy risk)

  • Women ≥60 years, men 40-59 years
  • 10-30 pack-years smoking history
  • 11-25 RBCs/HPF
  • Workup: Cystoscopy + upper tract imaging (CT urography preferred) 2

High Risk (1.3%-6.3% malignancy risk)

  • Men ≥60 years
  • 30 pack-years smoking history

  • 25 RBCs/HPF

  • History of gross hematuria
  • Occupational chemical exposure
  • Workup: Mandatory cystoscopy + CT urography + voided urine cytology 1, 2

Step 5: Imaging and Endoscopic Evaluation

Upper Tract Imaging

  • Multiphasic CT urography is the preferred modality for detecting renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, and urolithiasis in intermediate- and high-risk patients 4, 1, 2
  • Renal ultrasound alone is insufficient for comprehensive upper tract evaluation 1
  • In children, ultrasound is preferred to assess kidney anatomy before potential renal biopsy 1

Lower Tract Evaluation

  • Flexible cystoscopy is mandatory for intermediate- and high-risk patients to evaluate for bladder transitional cell carcinoma (most frequently diagnosed malignancy in hematuria) 1, 2
  • Cystoscopy causes less pain than rigid cystoscopy with equivalent diagnostic accuracy 1

Urine Cytology

  • Perform in high-risk patients to detect high-grade urothelial cancers and carcinoma in situ 1, 2

Step 6: Follow-Up Protocol

If Initial Workup Negative

  • Repeat urinalysis at 6,12,24, and 36 months with blood pressure monitoring at each visit 1, 2
  • Immediate re-evaluation warranted if: gross hematuria develops, significant increase in microscopic hematuria, new urologic symptoms, development of hypertension/proteinuria/glomerular bleeding 1, 2

Nephrology Referral Indications

  • Persistent hematuria with hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 1, 2
  • Persistent significant proteinuria (protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.2 for three specimens) 1
  • Red cell casts or >80% dysmorphic RBCs 1

Special Considerations

Gross Hematuria

  • 30-40% association with malignancy—requires urgent urologic referral even if self-limited 1
  • Never ignore gross hematuria regardless of potential benign causes 1

Anticoagulation Therapy

  • Not a reason to defer evaluation—anticoagulants may unmask underlying pathology but do not cause hematuria 1
  • Proceed with full workup as indicated by risk stratification 1

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

  • BPH can cause hematuria but does not exclude concurrent malignancy 1
  • Gross hematuria attributed to BPH must be proven through appropriate evaluation 1

References

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Microscopic Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Microscopic Hematuria Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.