ECMO: Indications and Management Strategies
ECMO should be initiated for severe refractory respiratory failure with hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg despite optimal ventilation) or cardiac failure with cardiogenic shock unresponsive to conventional therapies, with veno-venous (VV) ECMO for respiratory failure and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO for cardiac failure. 1, 2
Primary Indications
Respiratory Failure (VV-ECMO)
- Refractory hypoxemia despite maximal conventional therapies including lung-protective ventilation, prone positioning, and neuromuscular blockade 3, 2
- Uncompensated hypercapnia with severe respiratory acidosis not responding to optimal mechanical ventilation 3, 2
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with severe gas exchange abnormalities 3, 4
- Bridge to lung transplantation in selected patients 5
Cardiac Failure (VA-ECMO)
- Severe refractory cardiogenic shock unresponsive to inotropes and vasopressors 1, 6
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for refractory cardiac arrest requiring rapid initiation to improve neurologic outcomes 2, 6
- Refractory ventricular arrhythmias 6
- Acute or decompensated right heart failure 6
- Failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass 1
- Bridge to durable ventricular assist device or heart transplantation 6
Critical Management Strategies
Neurological Monitoring and Complications
Daily neurological assessments are mandatory, with immediate non-contrast head CT for any acute neurological change to rule out intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). 1
Stroke Management
- Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is contraindicated in ECMO patients due to high bleeding risk with systemic anticoagulation and platelet dysfunction 1
- Mechanical thrombectomy is recommended for acute large vessel occlusion detected by CT angiogram 1
- CT angiogram with perfusion scan should be obtained to assess salvageable penumbra 1
Intracranial Hemorrhage Management
- For ICH during VV-ECMO: prolonged cessation of systemic anticoagulation (>2 days) is recommended 1
- For ICH during VA-ECMO: balance thromboembolism risk against bleeding risk, as VA-ECMO carries higher thrombotic risk when anticoagulation is held 1
- VV-ECMO can be maintained without anticoagulation longer than VA-ECMO due to lower thromboembolism risk 1
- Early cessation and judicious resumption of anticoagulation with repeated neuroimaging is the recommended approach 1
Neurosurgical Interventions
- Decompressive craniectomy may be considered for space-occupying lesions with malignant edema after multidisciplinary risk-benefit discussion 1
- Careful anticoagulation monitoring and resumption post-operatively is essential 1
- External ventricular drain placement may be considered only in patients at imminent risk of death from intraventricular hemorrhage with hydrocephalus, despite high bleeding risk 1
- Invasive ICP monitoring should be used cautiously as no data suggests improved outcomes and may increase parenchymal hemorrhage risk 1
Neurological Prognostication
Neurological prognostication must use a multimodality approach combining clinical examination, electrophysiological tests, and neuroimaging—never rely on a single factor. 1
Key Prognostic Elements
- Rule out confounding factors: sedatives, electrolyte disturbances, hypothermia 1
- Assess pupillary and corneal reflexes at ≥72 hours 1
- Bilateral absence of N20 cortical waves on somatosensory evoked potentials at ≥24 hours suggests poor prognosis 1
- Highly malignant EEG patterns at >24 hours 1
- Neuron-specific enolase threshold for poor outcome in ECPR likely exceeds 100 μg/L (higher than non-ECMO patients due to hemolysis) 1
- Extensive diffuse anoxic injury on brain CT/MRI 1
ICH during anticoagulated ECMO carries extremely high mortality and morbidity, though data on withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy are sparse 1
Brain Death Determination
Apnea testing can be performed by reducing sweep gas flow or adding exogenous CO2. 1
When apnea testing is contraindicated due to hemodynamic/cardiopulmonary instability, cerebral angiogram or radionuclide brain scan are the preferred ancillary tests 1
Goals of Care and Family Communication
Frequent family meetings should begin within 72 hours of cannulation, focusing on informed consent, early goal-setting with timelines, clear communication, and emotional support. 1
- Routine ethics consultation within 72 hours of cannulation can mitigate conflicts by setting clear expectations 1
- Families experience significant anxiety, depression, and PTSD long after discharge 1
- Withdrawal from ECMO should be structured with preparatory family meetings, symptom management, technical circuit management, and bereavement support 1
- Decisions regarding withdrawal should be highly individualized with multidisciplinary discussions considering patient preferences 1
Long-Term Outcomes and Follow-Up
37-52% of adult ECMO survivors have cerebral infarction or hemorrhage on long-term MRI, associated with cognitive impairment. 1
Pre-Discharge Care
- Clinical examination using modified Rankin Scale before discharge is recommended 1
- Brain MRI after decannulation for those with neurological or cognitive dysfunction 1
- Comprehensive education and psychosocial support for patients, families, and caretakers 1
- Nutritional assessment and planning for optimal recovery 1
Post-Discharge Care
- Outpatient visits at 3,6, and 12 months preferably at ECMO clinics or with neurologist 1
- Serial neurological and quality of life assessments 1
- For patients with neurological complications: neurological specialist examination, MRI, and tailored testing 1
- Follow-up with disease-specific specialists (pulmonologist, cardiologist, neurologist, nephrologist) as needed 1
Timing and Patient Selection
Early initiation of ECMO should be considered when hypoxemia and uncompensated hypercapnia do not respond to optimal conventional treatment. 3
- Prompt referral by emergency clinicians is necessary for optimal outcomes 2
- ECPR requires rapid initiation to prevent further decompensation and improve neurologic outcomes 2
- Multidisciplinary team assessment is essential for emergent deployment, particularly for cardiac failure 6
- Futility should not be determined solely by duration of ECMO; prolonged support for lung recovery may be worthwhile 3
Common Pitfalls
- Avoid overly pessimistic prognosis without ruling out confounding factors (sedation, electrolytes, hypothermia) 1
- Beware of "self-fulfilling prophecy" bias where poor prognostic tests influence premature withdrawal decisions 1
- Do not use single prognostic factors in isolation 1
- Recognize that standard neuron-specific enolase thresholds do not apply to ECMO patients due to hemolysis 1