What is the difference between Kadcyla (ado-trastuzumab emtansine) and Herzuma (trastuzumab) for HER2-positive breast cancer treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Kadcyla vs Herzuma: Key Differences in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment

Kadcyla (ado-trastuzumab emtansine/T-DM1) and Herzuma (trastuzumab biosimilar) are fundamentally different agents used at different stages of HER2-positive breast cancer treatment—Kadcyla is an antibody-drug conjugate reserved for second-line metastatic therapy after progression on trastuzumab-based treatment, while Herzuma is a first-line HER2-targeted antibody used in combination with chemotherapy. 1

Mechanism of Action

Kadcyla (T-DM1):

  • Antibody-drug conjugate that combines trastuzumab with the cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor DM1 (derivative of maytansine) via a stable thioether linker 2, 3
  • Delivers targeted chemotherapy directly to HER2-positive cancer cells while maintaining HER2 blockade 4
  • Mediates both antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and direct cytotoxic effects 4

Herzuma (Trastuzumab):

  • Humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the HER2 receptor 4
  • Inhibits HER2-mediated cell proliferation and mediates ADCC 4
  • Does not contain a cytotoxic payload—requires combination with chemotherapy for optimal efficacy 1

Clinical Indications and Line of Therapy

Kadcyla is indicated for:

  • Second-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after progression on trastuzumab and a taxane 1
  • Post-neoadjuvant treatment for patients with residual invasive disease after receiving trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy 1
  • Third-line or later treatment if not previously administered 1

Herzuma is indicated for:

  • First-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in combination with pertuzumab and a taxane (preferred regimen) 1
  • Adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer 1
  • Neoadjuvant treatment combined with chemotherapy 1
  • Maintenance therapy after completion of chemotherapy until disease progression 1

Efficacy Data

Kadcyla:

  • EMILIA trial demonstrated median overall survival of 29.9 months versus 25.9 months with lapatinib plus capecitabine (HR 0.75,95% CI 0.64-0.88) 5
  • Median progression-free survival of 9.6 months versus 6.4 months with lapatinib plus capecitabine 2, 5
  • Overall response rate of 43.6% versus 30.8% with control treatment 2
  • KATHERINE trial showed 50% reduction in risk of invasive disease recurrence or death when used post-neoadjuvant versus trastuzumab (HR 0.50,95% CI 0.39-0.64) 1

Herzuma (Trastuzumab):

  • CLEOPATRA trial established pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel as first-line standard, showing 16.3-month improvement in median overall survival (HR 0.69,95% CI 0.58-0.82) 1
  • Median progression-free survival of 18.5 months with pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel versus 12.4 months with trastuzumab-docetaxel alone 1
  • H0648g trial showed median overall survival of 25.1 months with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy versus 20.3 months with chemotherapy alone 4

Safety Profile and Tolerability

Kadcyla:

  • Grade 3 or worse adverse events in 48% of patients 5
  • Most common grade 3+ events: thrombocytopenia (14%), increased AST (5%), anemia (4%) 5
  • Hepatotoxicity requiring monitoring of liver enzymes 2, 5
  • Lower rates of diarrhea and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia compared to lapatinib plus capecitabine 5
  • Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events in 18% of patients in KATHERINE trial 1
  • Cardiac dysfunction less common than with trastuzumab plus anthracyclines 1

Herzuma (Trastuzumab):

  • When combined with pertuzumab: diarrhea (67% vs 46% without pertuzumab), rash (34% vs 24%), febrile neutropenia (14% vs 8%) 1, 6
  • Cardiac toxicity is a key concern, particularly when combined with anthracyclines (27% risk of significant cardiac dysfunction) 1, 6
  • Grade 3-5 adverse events in 54.1% when combined with taxane in MARIANNE trial 1
  • Infusion reactions occur in approximately 16% of patients 7
  • Requires cardiac monitoring with LVEF assessment 1, 4

Administration and Dosing

Kadcyla:

  • 3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks 2, 5
  • Given as monotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy 2
  • Continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity 5

Herzuma (Trastuzumab):

  • Loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks when used with pertuzumab 4
  • Alternative weekly dosing: 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly 4
  • Always combined with chemotherapy in first-line metastatic setting 1
  • Chemotherapy typically continued for 4-6 months, then trastuzumab maintenance until progression 1

Treatment Sequencing

The correct sequence is:

  1. First-line metastatic: Pertuzumab + trastuzumab (Herzuma) + taxane 1
  2. Second-line metastatic: Kadcyla (T-DM1) after progression on trastuzumab-based therapy 1
  3. Third-line and beyond: Continue HER2-targeted therapy with options including tucatinib-capecitabine-trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan (if available), or T-DM1 if not previously used 1

Important Clinical Considerations

Never use trastuzumab (Herzuma) concurrently with anthracyclines in the metastatic setting due to 27% risk of significant cardiac dysfunction 1, 6

For patients with recurrence within 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab:

  • If prior adjuvant therapy included pertuzumab: proceed directly to second-line therapy (Kadcyla) 1
  • If prior adjuvant therapy was trastuzumab without pertuzumab: may receive first-line pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane or proceed to second-line therapy 1

Kadcyla should not be used as first-line therapy except in highly selected patients unsuitable for the preferred pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane regimen, as the MARIANNE trial showed T-DM1 was noninferior but not superior to trastuzumab plus taxane, and pertuzumab-trastuzumab-taxane remains the only first-line regimen with proven overall survival benefit 1, 6

Emerging Evidence

Trastuzumab deruxtecan is now considered the preferred second-line therapy where available (DESTINY-Breast-03 trial: HR 0.28 for PFS compared to T-DM1), which may shift Kadcyla to later-line settings in regions with access to this newer antibody-drug conjugate 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.