What is the predictive value of a low probability Ventilation-Perfusion (VQ) scan for ruling out Pulmonary Embolism (PE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Predictive Value of Low Probability VQ Scan

A low probability VQ scan combined with low clinical probability has a negative predictive value of 96% (4% rate of PE), which is insufficient to rule out PE on its own and requires additional testing such as D-dimer or lower extremity ultrasound to safely exclude pulmonary embolism. 1

Clinical Probability Dramatically Alters Predictive Value

The interpretation of a low probability VQ scan is critically dependent on pretest clinical probability:

  • Low clinical probability patients: 4% rate of PE 1
  • Intermediate clinical probability patients: 16% rate of PE 1
  • High clinical probability patients: 40% rate of PE 1

This wide variation demonstrates that clinical risk stratification using validated tools (Wells score or revised Geneva score) is essential before interpreting VQ scan results. 1

When Low Probability VQ Scan Can Exclude PE

Level A Evidence (Strongest Recommendation)

A normal/near-normal perfusion scan reliably excludes clinically significant PE in patients with low-to-moderate pretest probability, with a negative likelihood ratio of approximately 0.1 and subsequent PE rates <1% on long-term follow-up. 1

Level B Evidence for Low Probability Scans

In patients with low-to-moderate pretest probability AND a low probability (non-diagnostic) VQ scan, PE can be excluded using one of these additional tests: 1

  1. Negative quantitative D-dimer (turbidimetric or ELISA)
  2. Negative whole blood qualitative D-dimer with Wells score ≤4
  3. Negative single bilateral venous ultrasound (for low probability patients)
  4. Negative serial bilateral venous ultrasound (for moderate probability patients)

The 2020 ESC guidelines support this approach, recommending that a non-diagnostic VQ scan combined with negative proximal compression ultrasound can exclude PE in patients with low clinical probability. 1

Very Low Probability Interpretation

Recent data from PIOPED II established "very low probability" criteria with improved predictive value: 2

Very low probability VQ scan criteria include:

  • Nonsegmental perfusion abnormalities
  • Perfusion defect smaller than corresponding chest X-ray lesion
  • ≥2 matched V/Q defects with normal chest X-ray
  • 1-3 small segmental perfusion defects (<25% of segment)
  • Stripe sign around perfusion defects 3, 2

When combined with low clinical probability assessment, very low probability VQ scans have a positive predictive value of only 3.1% (negative predictive value 96.9%), which reliably excludes PE. 2 In women ≤40 years with low clinical probability, this drops to 2% PPV. 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Never use a low probability VQ scan alone to exclude PE in patients with intermediate or high clinical probability, as the PE rate reaches 16-40% in these groups despite the "low probability" scan result. 1

Do not skip lower extremity ultrasound in patients with non-diagnostic scans, as asymptomatic proximal DVT is found in a significant proportion of PE patients and provides de facto evidence of venous thromboembolism requiring anticoagulation. 1

Avoid misclassifying intermediate probability scans as low probability, as 60% of PIOPED patients with PE had scans read as "low" or "intermediate" probability, making accurate categorization essential. 1

Practical Algorithm

For patients with low probability VQ scan:

  1. First, determine pretest clinical probability using Wells score or revised Geneva score 1

  2. If low clinical probability (Wells <2):

    • Obtain quantitative D-dimer OR
    • Obtain bilateral lower extremity ultrasound
    • If negative → PE excluded 1
  3. If intermediate clinical probability (Wells 2-6):

    • Obtain quantitative D-dimer AND/OR
    • Obtain serial bilateral lower extremity ultrasound
    • If both negative → PE excluded 1
  4. If high clinical probability (Wells >6):

    • Low probability VQ scan is insufficient
    • Proceed to CT pulmonary angiography or pulmonary angiography 1

A retrospective study of 536 patients with low probability VQ scans found zero cases of PE on 6-month follow-up, suggesting that in appropriately selected low-risk patients, the negative predictive value approaches 100%. 1 However, this requires rigorous clinical probability assessment and appropriate use of adjunctive testing as outlined above.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Evaluation of individual criteria for low probability interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1996

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.