Surgical Management of Uterine Prolapse
For symptomatic uterine prolapse requiring surgery, vaginal hysterectomy with vault suspension is the recommended approach, though uterine-preserving procedures (hysteropexy) are appropriate alternatives for women who desire to retain their uterus. 1
Primary Surgical Options
Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vault Suspension
- This remains the traditional gold standard for uterine prolapse, addressing both the prolapsed uterus and providing apical support to prevent subsequent vault prolapse 1, 2
- Vaginal hysterectomy offers shorter operating times, faster return to normal activities, better quality of life, lower infection rates, and shorter hospital stays compared to abdominal approaches 3
- The critical component is concurrent vault suspension (uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous fixation, or iliococcygeus fixation), as hysterectomy alone fails to address the underlying apical support defect 4, 2
Uterine-Preserving Surgery (Hysteropexy)
- Hysteropexy should be offered to all patients considering prolapse surgery unless contraindications exist 5
- Women may desire uterine preservation for fertility, gender identity, belief in functional benefits, or personal preference 5, 2, 6
- Available approaches include:
Comparative Outcomes: Hysterectomy vs. Hysteropexy
Efficacy
- Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy demonstrates 81% symptom resolution and 79% objective cure at 12-month follow-up, with mean operating time of 42 minutes 4
- Both approaches show comparable success rates for prolapse correction in short to medium term (up to 5 years) 7, 5
- No significant difference in sexual function between uterine-preserving surgery and hysterectomy-based repairs 5
Safety Considerations
- The rate of subsequent hysterectomy after hysteropexy is low, most commonly performed for recurrent prolapse rather than uterine pathology 5
- Patients must continue cervical cancer screening and evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding following hysteropexy 5
- If cervical elongation is present, trachelectomy should be considered at the time of uterine-preserving surgery 5
Route Selection Algorithm
Factors Favoring Vaginal Approach
- Adequate vaginal access and uterine mobility 3
- Prior vaginal deliveries 3
- Presence of concomitant vaginal prolapse requiring repair 3
- Patient preference for faster recovery 3
Factors Favoring Abdominal/Laparoscopic Approach
- Limited vaginal access or mobility 7
- Desire for sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy (higher anatomic success rates) 7
- Concomitant abdominal pathology requiring treatment 7
- Surgeon expertise with minimally invasive techniques 7
Critical Counseling Points
For All Patients
- Hysterectomy provides the benefit of cancer detection and prevention, eliminating future risk of endometrial and cervical cancer 5
- Vaginal hysterectomy alone has relatively high subsequent vault prolapse rates without concurrent vault suspension 4, 2
- The Manchester repair (cervical amputation with cardinal ligament plication) has high failure rates and may complicate future cervical/uterine sampling 4
For Patients Considering Hysteropexy
- Fertility preservation is possible; limited data show successful term pregnancies after laparoscopic hysteropexy, though cesarean delivery is typically recommended 4
- Ongoing need for gynecologic surveillance including cervical cancer screening 5
- Small risk of future hysterectomy for recurrent prolapse or uterine pathology 5
Important Caveats
- Surgeon expertise is paramount—surgeons should only perform procedures they are properly trained and comfortable performing 3
- Patient-specific factors (body habitus, medical comorbidities, concomitant pathology) must guide individualized surgical planning 3, 7
- Obliterative procedures (colpocleisis) remain options for elderly patients or those with significant comorbidities who do not desire vaginal intercourse 7
- Prospective randomized trials comparing hysterectomy with hysteropexy are still needed to provide definitive comparative data 2, 6