What autoantibody tests are used to diagnose latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), also known as type 1.5 diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Autoantibody Testing for Type 1.5 Diabetes (LADA)

Start with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies as your primary test, and if negative, proceed to IA-2 and ZnT8 antibodies to confirm or exclude LADA. 1, 2, 3

Primary Testing Algorithm

First-Line Test

  • GAD antibodies should be measured first, as they are present in 70-80% of LADA cases and represent the most frequently positive marker 2, 4, 3
  • GAD positivity alone has a positive predictive value of 92% for requiring insulin within 3 years in adults aged 15-34 years 1

Second-Line Tests (If GAD Negative)

  • IA-2 (insulinoma-associated antigen-2) antibodies should be tested next, as they are detected in 50-60% of type 1 diabetes patients and indicate rapid progression risk 1, 2, 4
  • ZnT8 (zinc transporter 8) antibodies should also be included where available, as they are found in approximately 50% of patients and serve as a surrogate marker of beta-cell destruction 1, 2, 4

Conditional Test

  • Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) should only be measured if the patient has not yet started insulin therapy, as the test becomes invalid once exogenous insulin is administered 1, 2, 3
  • IAA can improve LADA diagnosis rate by 2.39% when combined with GAD and IA-2 testing 5

Supporting Metabolic Tests

C-Peptide Measurement

  • C-peptide testing is primarily indicated when the patient is already on insulin therapy to assess residual beta-cell function 1, 2, 3
  • Obtain a random (non-fasting) sample within 5 hours of eating with concurrent glucose measurement 2
  • Interpretation: <200 pmol/L (<0.6 ng/mL) indicates significant beta-cell loss consistent with type 1 diabetes; 200-600 pmol/L (0.6-1.8 ng/mL) is indeterminate and consistent with LADA in the appropriate clinical context; >600 pmol/L (>1.8 ng/mL) suggests type 2 diabetes with preserved beta-cell function 1, 2, 3

Critical pitfall: A low-normal C-peptide (e.g., 1.3 ng/mL) should not be used to exclude LADA—autoantibody testing must still be performed, as demonstrated in cases where patients with "normal" C-peptide had positive GAD antibodies >250 IU/mL 6

When to Order These Tests

Test for LADA when adults present with any of the following features 2, 3:

  • Age <35 years at diagnosis with features that could be either type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • Unintentional weight loss despite diabetes diagnosis
  • Lean body habitus (BMI <25 kg/m²) at presentation
  • Ketoacidosis or ketosis in an obese patient
  • Rapid progression to insulin dependence despite initial non-insulin therapy
  • Personal or family history of autoimmune diseases

Risk Stratification Based on Results

Single Positive Autoantibody

  • Carries only 15% risk of progression to insulin dependence within 10 years 4, 3

Multiple Positive Autoantibodies

  • Two or more positive autoantibodies indicate 70% risk of diabetes progression within 10 years, with 44% risk at 5 years 4, 3
  • Multiple autoantibodies with dysglycemia carry 60% risk by 2 years and 75% risk within 5 years of requiring insulin 1, 3
  • The combination frequency of three antibodies (GAD, IA-2, IAA) is 10.47%, which is higher than any single antibody testing 5

Important Caveats

Antibody-Negative Cases

  • 5-10% of true autoimmune diabetes cases are antibody-negative, so negative antibodies in a lean, young adult with acute onset do not exclude LADA 1, 2, 3
  • In patients diagnosed under 35 years with no clinical features of type 2 diabetes or monogenic diabetes, negative antibodies should not alter the presumptive diagnosis of type 1 diabetes 2

Tests NOT Recommended

  • HLA typing (HLA-DR-DQ) is not recommended for routine clinical diagnosis or classification of LADA, as it can only increase or decrease probability but is not diagnostic 3
  • Genetic risk scores and SNP typing have no value for diagnosis or management of LADA in clinical practice 3

Specificity Concerns

  • In adults without clinical features of type 1 diabetes, a single positive antibody will likely represent a false-positive result due to imperfect test specificity in low-prevalence populations 7
  • Islet autoantibody testing should not be undertaken in patients who do not have clinical features suggestive of autoimmune diabetes 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Distinguishing Type 1 from Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Classification of Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diabetes Autoantibody Testing and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.