What is the interpretation of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores in assessing obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) severity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) Scoring Interpretation

The Y-BOCS is a 10-item clinician-rated scale with total scores ranging from 0 to 40, where each item is scored 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with obsessions and compulsions each contributing up to 20 points to the total score. 1, 2

Score Ranges and Severity Classification

The Y-BOCS quantifies OCD symptom severity based on time spent on obsessions/compulsions, distress levels, and degree of functional interference 1, 3:

  • 0-7: Subclinical symptoms
  • 8-15: Mild OCD
  • 16-23: Moderate OCD
  • 24-31: Severe OCD
  • 32-40: Extreme OCD

For severe, treatment-refractory OCD requiring consideration of neurosurgical interventions, a threshold score of ≥28 is required (or ≥14 if only obsessions or only compulsions are present). 1

Diagnostic Utility

A cut-off score of 13 on the Y-BOCS-II (Second Edition) demonstrates optimal discriminatory ability for OCD diagnosis, with sensitivity of 85-90% and specificity of 94-97%. 4 This threshold effectively distinguishes OCD patients from both healthy controls and patients with other mood and anxiety disorders 4.

The scale's content-independent design allows it to measure severity regardless of the specific type of obsessions or compulsions present, making it applicable across all OCD presentations including relationship-themed obsessions 3, 2.

Clinical Application for Treatment Monitoring

A clinically meaningful treatment response is defined as a ≥35% reduction from baseline Y-BOCS scores. 3, 5

For example, case studies demonstrate dramatic symptom reduction tracking: a patient with Sexual Orientation OCD showed Y-BOCS scores decreasing from 24 (severe range) at intake to 3 (subclinical) post-treatment following exposure and response prevention therapy 1.

Administration Requirements

The Y-BOCS is a semi-structured clinician-rated interview, not a self-report measure 2, 6:

  • Ratings are based on both patient report and clinician observation during the interview 6
  • Clinicians must be trained in recognizing nuanced OCD presentations to ensure accurate scoring 3
  • The scale should be administered alongside thorough clinical assessment of specific obsession/compulsion content, as the Y-BOCS itself is content-independent 3

Psychometric Properties

The Y-BOCS demonstrates excellent reliability and validity 2, 7, 8:

  • Interrater reliability: Intraclass correlations >0.85-0.99 7, 8
  • Test-retest reliability: Correlations 0.64-0.94 7, 8
  • Internal consistency: Cronbach's α = 0.86-0.96 7, 8, 4
  • Factor structure: Two-factor solution corresponding to Obsession and Compulsion Severity subscales 7, 4

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

Avoidance behaviors may lead to underestimation of symptom severity on the Y-BOCS. 1 Patients who extensively avoid triggering situations may spend less time on active obsessions/compulsions, artificially lowering scores despite severe functional impairment 1.

Family accommodation assessment must accompany Y-BOCS administration, as relationship partners or family members may inadvertently reinforce symptoms through reassurance-giving or participation in rituals, which affects the accuracy of interference ratings 3.

The Y-BOCS-II (Second Edition) addresses limitations of the original version by integrating avoidance into severity scoring and modifying item content based on improved phenomenological understanding of OCD 7, 8.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.