Berlin Criteria for ARDS Definition
The Berlin Definition requires four essential components: acute onset within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new/worsening respiratory symptoms, bilateral opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by effusions/atelectasis/nodules, respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload, and impaired oxygenation classified by PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio with minimum PEEP of 5 cmH₂O. 1, 2, 3
Timing Criterion
- Onset must occur within 1 week of a known clinical insult or development of new or worsening respiratory symptoms 1, 2, 3
- This temporal requirement distinguishes ARDS from chronic or subacute lung processes 3
Imaging Criterion
- Bilateral opacities must be present on chest radiograph or CT scan 1, 2
- These opacities cannot be fully explained by pleural effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules 1, 4
- A reference set of chest radiographs has been developed to enhance inter-observer reliability and standardize interpretation 3
Origin of Edema Criterion
- Respiratory failure cannot be fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload 1, 2
- The pulmonary artery wedge pressure criterion from prior definitions was removed 3
- If no clear ARDS risk factor is apparent, objective assessment (such as echocardiography) is required to exclude hydrostatic pulmonary edema 1, 4
Oxygenation Criterion and Severity Classification
All severity categories require measurement with minimum PEEP of 5 cmH₂O: 1, 5, 2
Mild ARDS: 200 mmHg < PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 300 mmHg with PEEP or CPAP ≥5 cmH₂O 1, 5, 2
Moderate ARDS: 100 mmHg < PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 200 mmHg with PEEP ≥5 cmH₂O 1, 5, 2
Severe ARDS: PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 100 mmHg with PEEP ≥10 cmH₂O 1, 5, 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Always calculate PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio with patients on at least 5 cmH₂O of PEEP to avoid misclassification of severity 5, 4
- Misattribution of pulmonary edema to non-cardiogenic causes when cardiac failure is actually present leads to incorrect diagnosis 5, 4
- The Berlin Definition has better predictive validity for mortality compared to the prior American-European Consensus Conference definition (area under ROC 0.577 vs 0.536, P < .001) 2
- The definition inherently creates heterogeneity by not requiring specific etiological, physiological, or biological criteria, which may explain why many targeted therapies have failed in clinical trials 1