What is the prevalence of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) presentation after Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevalence of STEMI Presentation Post-ROSC

The prevalence of STEMI presentation after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) ranges from approximately 5.7% to 7.2% of all cardiac arrest survivors, though among those with suspected cardiac etiology and no obvious non-cardiac cause, the rate of acute coronary lesions is substantially higher at 59-71%. 1

Epidemiological Data

Overall STEMI Prevalence in Cardiac Arrest Survivors

  • In unselected cardiac arrest populations, STEMI accounts for 5.7-7.2% of all ROSC cases. 2, 3
  • Among 2,393 consecutive STEMI patients, 135 (5.7%) presented after achieving ROSC, with 36% regaining consciousness and 64% remaining comatose during initial evaluation. 2
  • In another cohort of 1,836 consecutive STEMI admissions for primary PCI, 132 patients (7.2%) had suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC. 3

STEMI in Cardiac Arrest of Suspected Cardiac Origin

  • When focusing specifically on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients without obvious non-cardiac etiology, the prevalence of acute coronary artery lesions is dramatically higher at 59-71%. 1
  • Among patients with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block on post-ROSC ECG, more than 80% will have an acute coronary lesion requiring intervention. 1

Diagnostic Accuracy Considerations

ECG Findings Post-ROSC

  • In comatose cardiac arrest survivors, ST-segment elevations were present in 54% of post-ROSC ECGs, but only 48% ultimately had confirmed STEMI. 4
  • The sensitivity of ST-elevation on ROSC-ECG for predicting STEMI is 74% (95% CI 62-84%), with specificity of 65% (95% CI 53-75%). 4
  • Timing of ECG acquisition matters significantly: ECGs obtained ≤7 minutes after ROSC have an 18.5% false-positive rate for STEMI compared to 7.2% at 8-33 minutes and 5.8% beyond 33 minutes. 5

Distribution by Consciousness Status

  • Among STEMI patients post-ROSC, approximately one-third (30-36%) present with normal neurologic status or regain consciousness, while two-thirds (64-70%) remain comatose. 1, 2
  • Conscious patients with STEMI after cardiac arrest have survival rates comparable to STEMI patients without cardiac arrest (94.8-100% hospital survival without neurological deficit). 2

Clinical Context for Prevalence Interpretation

Non-Shockable Rhythms

  • In patients with non-shockable initial rhythms (PEA/Asystole) who achieve ROSC and do not have STEMI on ECG, the overall incidence of coronary intervention is 5.5%, though among those selected for angiography without STEMI indication, 24.7% still required coronary intervention. 6

Prognostic Implications

  • The presence of STEMI post-ROSC carries different prognostic implications based on neurologic status: conscious patients have excellent outcomes with primary PCI, while comatose patients have 51% hospital survival overall and only 29% survival with good neurologic outcome (CPC 1-2). 2
  • Time to ROSC is a critical determinant: every additional minute increases mortality hazard by 1.7% and increases odds of neurological deficit by 7.0%. 3

Common pitfall: Do not assume all ST-elevations immediately post-ROSC represent true STEMI—early ECGs (≤7 minutes) have nearly triple the false-positive rate compared to those obtained after 8 minutes, so consider repeating the ECG if obtained very early or if clinical picture is discordant. 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.