What are the key trials comparing early versus delayed initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) in Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Key Trials Comparing Early versus Delayed RRT Initiation in AKI

Major Randomized Controlled Trials

The two pivotal RCTs published in 2016 showed contradictory results regarding early versus delayed RRT initiation, with one demonstrating benefit and the other suggesting potential harm. 1

ELAIN Trial (2016)

  • Single-center German RCT of 231 critically ill patients with KDIGO stage 2 AKI and elevated NGAL (>150 ng/mL) 2
  • Early group: RRT initiated within 8 hours of KDIGO stage 2 diagnosis (median 6 hours) 2
  • Delayed group: RRT initiated within 12 hours of KDIGO stage 3 or not at all (median 25.5 hours) 2
  • Primary outcome: 90-day mortality was significantly lower in early group (39.3% vs 54.7%; HR 0.66, P=0.03) 2
  • Secondary outcomes favored early initiation: better renal recovery (53.6% vs 38.7%, P=0.02), shorter RRT duration (9 vs 25 days, P=0.04), and shorter hospital stay (51 vs 82 days, P<0.001) 2
  • One-year follow-up data showed sustained benefit with early initiation: composite outcome of major adverse kidney events occurred in 64.9% vs 89.1% (OR 0.23, P<0.001) 3

Unnamed Second 2016 RCT

  • This trial suggested potential harm with early RRT, including increased mortality, dialysis dependence, and central line infections 1
  • Enrollment criteria and timing definitions differed from ELAIN 1
  • The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines judged this evidence as low certainty due to indirectness (many non-septic patients) and imprecision 1

Comprehensive Meta-Analyses

2021 Systematic Review with Trial Sequential Analysis

  • Included 11 RCTs with 5,086 patients; found no mortality benefit with early RRT initiation 4
  • Pooled 28-day mortality: RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.09, P=0.77, I²=0%) 4
  • Trial sequential analysis crossed the futility boundary, indicating sufficient evidence to conclude no benefit 4
  • Early RRT associated with higher incidence of hypotension (RR 1.42, P<0.00001) and RRT-associated infections (RR 1.34, P=0.04) 4
  • Median time to RRT ranged from 2-7.6 hours (early) versus 21-57 hours (delayed) across studies 4

2023 Updated Meta-Analysis

  • Analyzed 15 RCTs with 5,625 patients; confirmed no survival benefit at any time point 5
  • 28/30-day mortality: RR 1.01 (95% CI 0.94-1.08, P=0.87) 5
  • 60-day mortality: RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.71-1.06, P=0.16) 5
  • 90-day mortality: RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.88-1.13, P=0.97) 5
  • Early RRT associated with more adverse events without improving ventilator-free days, vasoactive agent-free days, or RRT-free days 5

Special Population Studies

Small 2002 Trial in Sepsis

  • Evaluated early versus delayed RRT in sepsis; included only 4 septic patients and showed no benefit 1

2025 Burn Patient Cohort Study

  • Retrospective study of 79 burn patients (mean 68.82% TBSA) comparing early (KDIGO stage 1-2) versus delayed (KDIGO stage 3) RRT 6
  • In-hospital mortality trended higher in early group (42.86% vs 29.73%, P=0.227) 6
  • Delayed group had significantly higher rate of partial renal function recovery at 48 hours (78.26% vs 36.84%, P=0.003) 6
  • Subgroup analysis: patients with stage 3 AKI receiving RRT beyond 24 hours had highest survival rate 6

Guideline Interpretation of Trial Evidence

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2016 guidelines concluded that the possibility of harm (central line infections, increased dialysis dependence) outweighs potential benefits, recommending against early RRT in sepsis patients with AKI based solely on creatinine elevation or oliguria without definitive indications 1

Related Questions

What is the optimal timing for initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI)?
When should renal replacement therapy (RRT) be initiated in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI)?
Does early introduction of renal replacement therapy (RRT) improve renal outcomes?
What are the findings of the Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) trials, including AKIKI (Acute Kidney Injury - Kidney Injury), AKIKI 2, ELAIN, and IDEAL ICU (Intensive Care Unit) regarding Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) initiation in critically ill patients?
Does a patient with normal creatine kinase (CK) levels 10 hours after a long lie require continued renal monitoring?
What is the optimal timing for initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI)?
What is the process of placenta formation?
What is the immediate management with medication for a patient presenting with an RSR (Ragged S wave and R prime wave) pattern in leads V1 and V2 on an electrocardiogram (ECG)?
Is the treatment regimen of azithromycin (T azee 500), levosalbutamol (levoset), ambroxol (30 mg), and pantoprazole appropriate for a 15-year-old girl with a history of juvenile epilepsy presenting with fever, wet cough with yellowish sputum, rhinitis, and headache, diagnosed with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI)?
How to taper off venlafaxine (Effexor) 225mg/day?
What is the evaluation and treatment approach for a 55-year-old male complaining of pain in the deep perineal area or lumbar region after urination (micturition), without pain before or during urination and no lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.