What is the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one death from prostate cancer with a Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Number Needed to Treat with PSA Screening

The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one prostate cancer death with PSA screening is approximately 5 men, based on modeling of the highest quality European screening trial data. 1

Most Recent and Highest Quality Evidence

The 18-year follow-up of the Göteborg trial (2015) provides the most mature data, showing that 13 men needed to be diagnosed with prostate cancer to prevent one prostate cancer death. 1 This represents the number needed to diagnose (NND), which is distinct from but related to the NNT.

For the broader ERSPC trial at 13-year follow-up, 27 additional prostate cancers needed to be detected to prevent one prostate cancer death. 1

Understanding the Different "Numbers Needed"

The evidence presents three distinct metrics that are often confused:

  • Number Needed to Screen (NNS): The Göteborg 18-year data shows 139 men needed to be invited for screening to prevent one prostate cancer death. 1

  • Number Needed to Diagnose (NND): 13 men needed to be diagnosed with prostate cancer to prevent one death (Göteborg 18-year). 1

  • Number Needed to Treat (NNT): Modeling of ERSPC data estimates 5 men with screen-detected prostate cancer need treatment to prevent one prostate cancer death. 1

Evolution of NNT Over Time

A critical pitfall is that NNT decreases substantially with longer follow-up. 2 At 9 years of ERSPC follow-up, the original NNT was 48, but modeling suggests this decreases to approximately 18 by year 12 as the mortality benefit accumulates. 2 The most refined modeling estimates settle on NNT of 5 when accounting for compliance and longer follow-up. 1

Critical Context: Mortality Outcomes

PSA screening does NOT reduce all-cause mortality. 3, 4 The ERSPC trial showed identical all-cause mortality in screened versus control groups (RR 1.00,95% CI 0.98-1.02) after 11 years. 3 Even the most recent 15-year CAP trial follow-up showed no all-cause mortality benefit (RR 0.97,95% CI 0.94-1.01). 5

The prostate cancer-specific mortality reduction is small in absolute terms: approximately 0.71 deaths prevented per 1000 men screened over 9-11 years. 6 At 15 years, the CAP trial showed a reduction from 0.78% to 0.69% prostate cancer mortality—an absolute difference of only 0.09%. 5

Treatment Harms That Offset Benefits

For every prostate cancer death prevented, 200-300 men experience permanent urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction from treatment. 3, 4 Specifically:

  • 1 in 5 men (20%) undergoing radical prostatectomy develop long-term urinary incontinence 4
  • 2 in 3 men (67%) experience long-term erectile dysfunction 4
  • Up to 50% of screen-detected cancers represent overdiagnosis 3

Clinical Algorithm for Counseling

When discussing PSA screening with patients aged 55-69 years:

  1. State clearly: Screening may prevent approximately 1 prostate cancer death per 1000 men screened over 10-13 years 4, 6

  2. Emphasize: This does NOT translate to living longer overall—all-cause mortality is unchanged 3, 4, 5

  3. Quantify treatment burden: Of men diagnosed through screening, approximately 5 will need treatment to prevent 1 prostate cancer death, but 200-300 will experience permanent sexual or urinary dysfunction 3, 4

  4. Explain overdiagnosis: Up to half of screen-detected cancers would never have caused symptoms or death 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not conflate NNT with NNS. 1, 2 The number needed to screen (139-1410 depending on follow-up duration) is vastly different from the number needed to treat (5) among those diagnosed. 1, 2

Do not assume younger or healthier men benefit more. 3 Subgroup analyses showed no effect of screening on all-cause mortality regardless of age at screening. 3

Do not ignore the 10-15 year time horizon required for any benefit. 3 Men with life expectancy less than 10-15 years cannot benefit from screening and should not be screened. 3, 4

Do not present only the prostate cancer-specific mortality benefit without discussing that overall survival is unchanged. 3, 4 This violates shared decision-making standards and misrepresents the evidence. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

What is the true number needed to screen and treat to save a life with prostate-specific antigen testing?

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011

Guideline

PSA Screening and Mortality

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

The New England journal of medicine, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.