Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion
Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab or aflibercept) are the first-line treatment for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion, providing superior visual outcomes compared to all other treatment modalities. 1, 2
Initial Treatment Algorithm for Macular Edema
First-Line: Anti-VEGF Therapy
Begin with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections immediately for any patient with vision loss from macular edema secondary to either branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). 2, 3
FDA-approved options include ranibizumab 0.5 mg or aflibercept 2 mg administered intravitreally, with bevacizumab used off-label. 2, 4
Start with 3 monthly loading injections, then transition to pro-re-nata (PRN) or treat-and-extend regimens based on OCT findings rather than visual acuity alone. 5
Early treatment is critical—delays lead to suboptimal visual outcomes and permanent vision loss. 2, 5
The BRAVO trial demonstrated that monthly ranibizumab resulted in 16-18 letter gains compared to only 7.3 letters with sham injections at 6 months. 2
Second-Line: Intravitreal Corticosteroids
Reserve intravitreal corticosteroids (dexamethasone implant or triamcinolone) for patients with contraindications to anti-VEGF therapy. 2, 3, 5
These agents are effective but carry significant risks including secondary glaucoma and cataract formation. 2
Consider as an alternative when monthly follow-up for anti-VEGF injections is not feasible. 5
Third-Line: Laser Photocoagulation
Grid laser photocoagulation is no longer recommended as initial therapy because recent trials (BRIGHTER and RETAIN) showed that adding laser to ranibizumab provided no additional benefit. 1, 2
The CVOS demonstrated no value of focal photocoagulation for macular edema in CRVO patients. 1
Laser may be considered only for patients who cannot receive injections or maintain follow-up. 1
Treatment of Neovascular Complications
For BRVO with Neovascularization
- Perform sectoral panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) when complications such as vitreous hemorrhage or iris neovascularization occur. 1, 2
For CRVO with Neovascularization
Perform immediate and complete peripheral PRP for any iris or angle neovascularization. 1, 2, 3
Consider initial anti-VEGF injection as adjunctive therapy to facilitate complete laser delivery and provide immediate benefit, though this is off-label without phase 3 trial evidence. 1, 3
PRP prevents progression to neovascular glaucoma, a vision-threatening complication. 2
Critical Monitoring Protocol
First 6 Months (Monthly Visits)
Perform monthly examinations for the first 6 months in all CRVO patients and ischemic CRVO patients after discontinuing anti-VEGF to detect neovascularization early. 1, 2, 3
At each visit, assess:
- Visual acuity 1, 3
- Undilated gonioscopy before dilation to detect angle neovascularization 1, 3
- Slit-lamp biomicroscopy with careful iris examination 1, 3
- Intraocular pressure measurement 1, 3
- Pupillary assessment for relative afferent pupillary defect 1
- OCT imaging to monitor macular edema and guide re-treatment decisions 1, 3, 5
- Dilated fundus examination of posterior pole and peripheral retina 1
Fluorescein Angiography
Obtain fluorescein angiography before starting treatment and during follow-up to assess retinal ischemia and capillary nonperfusion. 3, 5
Significant retinal ischemia increases risk for proliferative complications requiring laser treatment. 5
Systemic Evaluation and Risk Factor Management
Immediately refer all RVO patients to their primary care physician for cardiovascular risk factor optimization, as RVO is associated with increased stroke and myocardial infarction risk. 1, 2, 3
Communicate the following to the primary care provider:
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not delay treatment waiting for spontaneous improvement—early intervention is essential for optimal outcomes. 2, 5
Do not skip gonioscopy before dilation—angle neovascularization can be missed if pupils are dilated first. 3
Do not add laser photocoagulation to anti-VEGF therapy expecting better outcomes—this has been proven ineffective. 1, 2
Do not use visual acuity alone to guide re-treatment decisions—OCT findings are more reliable for detecting persistent or recurrent macular edema. 5
Do not discontinue monitoring after 6 months in ischemic CRVO—neovascular complications can develop later. 1
Special Considerations
Anti-VEGF therapy in RVO patients carries a small risk of arterial thromboembolic events, with stroke rates of 0.2% in the ranibizumab group versus 0.4% in controls at 6 months. 4
All treatment modalities (anti-VEGF, laser, and intravitreal steroids) are cost-effective, with dollars per quality-adjusted life year ranging from $800-$26,000 for BRVO and $1,400-$16,000 for CRVO. 1, 2
Patients who fail to respond to treatment should be referred for vision rehabilitation and social services. 1