What is the best anabolic bone pharmacologic treatment for an 80-year-old woman with osteoporosis, chronic severe back pain, and a history of multiple fractures, including pelvic and proximal humerus fractures, but no radiologic evidence of vertebral compression fractures?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Anabolic Bone Pharmacologic Treatment Recommendation

For this 80-year-old woman with severe osteoporosis, multiple non-vertebral fractures (pelvic and proximal humerus), and very high fracture risk, teriparatide is the optimal anabolic agent, followed by mandatory transition to an antiresorptive agent after completion of therapy. 1, 2

Rationale for Anabolic Therapy Selection

This patient meets criteria for very high fracture risk based on: age >74 years, multiple prior osteoporotic fractures (two pelvic, one proximal humerus), and the clinical presentation of severe osteoporosis. 2 These characteristics warrant first-line anabolic therapy rather than antiresorptive agents. 2

Why Teriparatide Over Romosozumab

Teriparatide is the preferred anabolic agent for the following reasons:

  • Superior non-vertebral fracture reduction: Teriparatide reduces vertebral fractures by 65-69% and non-vertebral fragility fractures by 45-53%, which directly addresses this patient's pattern of pelvic and proximal humerus fractures. 3, 4, 5

  • Romosozumab limitations: While romosozumab is FDA-approved for high-risk postmenopausal osteoporosis 6, it has only conditional recommendation status with low-certainty evidence 2, and cardiovascular safety concerns may be relevant in an 80-year-old patient. 7

  • Established efficacy in elderly patients: Teriparatide has robust evidence in postmenopausal women with multiple fractures and does not require dose adjustment for age. 3, 8

Treatment Protocol

Initial Phase: Teriparatide

  • Dosing: 20 mcg subcutaneous injection daily for 18-24 months (maximum 2 years lifetime exposure). 1, 3, 8
  • Mechanism: Stimulates new bone formation and restores bone architecture, with rapid increases in bone formation markers. 3, 4
  • Expected outcomes: 10% increase in spine BMD, 3% increase in hip BMD, and significant fracture risk reduction. 3

Mandatory Transition Phase

Critical: After completing teriparatide therapy, the patient must transition to an antiresorptive agent (bisphosphonate or denosumab) to maintain bone gains and prevent rebound fractures. 1, 2, 4 The anabolic effect wanes after 12 months, and failure to transition risks losing all benefits. 6, 4

Essential Adjunctive Measures

All patients require:

  • Calcium: 1,000-1,200 mg daily 1, 2
  • Vitamin D: 800-1,000 IU daily 1, 2
  • Fall prevention counseling: Critical given chronic severe back pain 2
  • Weight-bearing and resistance exercises 2

Contraindications to Verify

Before prescribing teriparatide, confirm absence of:

  • Paget's disease of bone (increased osteosarcoma risk) 9
  • Prior skeletal radiation therapy 9
  • Bone metastases or history of skeletal malignancies 9
  • Active malignancies prone to bone metastases (breast, prostate, lung, kidney, thyroid) 9

Monitoring and Safety

  • Hypercalcemia monitoring: Check calcium 4-6 hours post-injection initially, as mild transient hypercalcemia can occur. 5
  • Urinary calcium: May increase by approximately 30 mg/day. 5
  • Treatment compliance: Daily subcutaneous injections require patient education and adherence support. 8
  • Well-tolerated profile: No serious adverse effects in clinical trials, with favorable compliance rates. 3, 8

Why Not Bisphosphonates First?

While bisphosphonates are first-line for most osteoporosis patients 10, this patient's very high fracture risk with multiple non-vertebral fractures places her in the category where anabolic agents should be initiated first, followed by antiresorptive therapy. 2 Bisphosphonates reduce vertebral fractures by 50-70% and non-vertebral by 20-30% 7, but teriparatide's 45-53% non-vertebral fracture reduction 4 and bone-building mechanism make it superior for this severe presentation.

Cost Considerations

Important caveat: Teriparatide is significantly more expensive than generic bisphosphonates. 1, 8 However, given the severity of this patient's presentation with multiple fractures and very high ongoing fracture risk, the superior efficacy justifies the cost. 8 After completing teriparatide, transition to generic bisphosphonates for cost-effective maintenance. 10, 1

References

Guideline

Teriparatide Treatment for Osteoporosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Severe Osteoporosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Teriparatide: A bone formation treatment for osteoporosis.

Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998), 2004

Research

Anabolic treatment for osteoporosis: teriparatide.

Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases, 2017

Research

Teriparatide: a review.

Clinical therapeutics, 2004

Research

Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults.

Lancet (London, England), 2022

Guideline

Contraindications and Precautions for Teriparatide Use

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.