What is the most appropriate next step for a patient with a headache and mild occipital tenderness after a fall, with no loss of consciousness or other symptoms?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Pediatric Minor Head Injury

For this child with mild occipital tenderness after a low-height fall, no loss of consciousness, and no other concerning features, reassurance and observation are appropriate without neuroimaging.

Clinical Decision-Making Framework

Risk Stratification Using Validated Criteria

The three major validated clinical decision rules for mild traumatic brain injury consistently identify low-risk patients who can safely avoid CT imaging 1:

  • New Orleans Criteria (GCS 15 only): This child lacks all high-risk features including GCS <15 at 2 hours, headache awakening from sleep, vomiting, drug/alcohol intoxication, deficits in short-term memory, physical evidence of trauma above clavicles, and seizure 1

  • Canadian CT Head Rule (GCS 13-15): No dangerous mechanism (fall from 2 feet does not qualify as dangerous mechanism, which typically requires >3 feet or 5 stairs in children), no vomiting episodes, age not >60 years, and no amnesia for >30 minutes 1

  • NICE Criteria: Age <65 years, no amnesia for 30 minutes, no posttraumatic seizure 1

When all high-risk criteria are absent, these rules demonstrate 97-100% sensitivity for excluding clinically significant intracranial injury, making CT safely avoidable 1.

Why Imaging is Not Indicated

  • CT head has a high negative predictive value for neurosurgical intervention in mild TBI, but neuroimaging should be avoided when it will not lead to a change in management 1

  • Patients are not significantly more likely than the general population to have a significant abnormality when they lack high-risk clinical features 1

  • The absence of loss of consciousness, combined with only mild tenderness and no scalp hematoma, places this patient in the lowest risk category 1

  • Skull x-rays have no role in modern head injury evaluation and do not predict intracranial pathology 1

  • MRI is not indicated for acute mild TBI evaluation and should be reserved for persistent neurologic, cognitive, or behavioral symptoms that develop later 1

Appropriate Management Plan

Immediate Actions

  • Provide reassurance to the family that serious injury is extremely unlikely given the clinical presentation 1

  • Educate about postconcussive symptoms that may develop (headache, dizziness, concentration problems, memory issues, irritability) which occur in approximately 28-58% of mild TBI patients but typically resolve within 3-12 months 1

Observation Instructions

  • Advise parents to monitor for red flag symptoms requiring urgent return: persistent vomiting, severe or worsening headache, confusion, unusual drowsiness, seizures, weakness, numbness, or behavioral changes 1

  • Contact family the following day to exclude concerning features if not admitted 1

  • Provide written discharge instructions about warning signs 1

Follow-Up Considerations

  • Routine follow-up CT is not supported for mild TBI with negative initial clinical assessment 1

  • Repeat imaging is only indicated if neurologic deterioration occurs 1

  • If headache persists or worsens beyond expected timeframe, consider alternative diagnoses, but isolated occipital tenderness after minor trauma in a neurologically normal child does not warrant immediate imaging 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not order imaging based solely on parental anxiety without clinical indications, though excessive worry may occasionally justify testing on a case-by-case basis 1

  • Do not dismiss persistent symptoms that develop later—these may warrant delayed MRI if they represent new-onset, progressive, or worsening neurologic, cognitive, or behavioral problems 1

  • Do not confuse mild occipital tenderness with true occipital neuralgia, which presents with paroxysmal lancinating pain and would be extremely unusual in this acute traumatic context 3, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Periorbital and Occipital Headache

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Occipital neuralgia: anatomic considerations.

Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2015

Research

Occipital neuralgia.

Current pain and headache reports, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.