Is the subcutaneous (SQ) route effective for biotin administration?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Subcutaneous Route for Biotin Administration

The subcutaneous (SQ) route is not recommended for biotin administration in clinical practice; oral or intravenous routes should be used instead based on intestinal function and clinical context. 1

Recommended Routes of Administration

Oral Route (First-Line)

  • Oral administration is the preferred route for biotin supplementation in patients with normal gastrointestinal function 1
  • Standard oral dosing of 30 mcg/day in enteral nutrition (per 1500 kcal) is recommended 1
  • For rapid replenishment in deficiency states, oral doses up to 10 mg/day may be used, even in malabsorption or short bowel syndrome 1
  • Oral biotin has excellent safety profile with no established upper limit for toxicity 1

Intravenous Route (Alternative)

  • IV administration should be used when intestinal function is compromised 1
  • In parenteral nutrition, 60 mcg biotin per day should be provided 1
  • For deficient PN-dependent patients, IV doses up to 200 mcg/day for 2-3 weeks may be required 1
  • No adverse effects have been documented with IV administration of pharmacological doses up to 5 mg/day for prolonged periods 1

Why Subcutaneous Route Is Not Recommended

Lack of Clinical Evidence

  • There is no guideline support or established clinical practice for subcutaneous biotin administration 1
  • The ESPEN micronutrient guideline specifically states biotin can be administered "either orally, enterally or IV depending on the intestinal function" with no mention of subcutaneous route 1

Safety Concerns from Research

  • One toxicology study found evidence of increased resorptions in rats receiving biotin by subcutaneous injection, with concomitant decreases in fetal, uterine, and placental weights 2
  • While another mouse study found no differences with subcutaneous injection, the conflicting animal data and lack of human studies make this route inadvisable 2
  • Intradermal injection (0.1 ml) in guinea pigs did not produce skin irritation, but this does not establish safety or efficacy for therapeutic subcutaneous dosing 2

Clinical Decision Algorithm

For biotin supplementation, choose route based on:

  1. Normal GI function → Use oral route (30-60 mcg/day maintenance; up to 10 mg/day for deficiency) 1

  2. Impaired GI function or malabsorption → Use IV route (60 mcg/day in PN; up to 200 mcg/day for severe deficiency) 1

  3. Never use subcutaneous route → No clinical evidence, potential safety concerns, and established alternatives available 1, 2

Important Caveats

  • Biotin interferes with laboratory assays including thyroid function, troponin, and other critical biomarkers—patients should discontinue biotin before laboratory testing 3
  • Despite widespread use, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence supporting biotin for hair, skin, or nail conditions 4, 5, 3
  • The subcutaneous route is well-established for other medications (opioids, myeloid growth factors, treprostinil) but has not been validated for biotin 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Final report on the safety assessment of biotin.

International journal of toxicology, 2001

Research

A survey-based study of physician practices regarding biotin supplementation.

The Journal of dermatological treatment, 2022

Research

Consumer Perception of Biotin Supplementation.

Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.