What should the ratio of High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) to Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) be?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HDL to LDL Ratio: Not a Treatment Target

The HDL/LDL ratio should be used only for cardiovascular risk assessment, not as a treatment target—LDL cholesterol remains the primary therapeutic goal with specific absolute targets based on risk category. 1, 2

Primary Treatment Target: LDL Cholesterol Alone

  • LDL cholesterol is the primary target for treatment because nearly all lipid-lowering trials have used LDL-C as the indicator of treatment response, with robust evidence that LDL reduction improves cardiovascular outcomes. 1, 2

  • Every 1.0 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) reduction in LDL-C produces dose-dependent reductions in cardiovascular disease, as confirmed by meta-analysis involving over 170,000 patients. 2

  • The European Society of Cardiology explicitly states that "TC and LDL-C remain the primary targets recommended in these guidelines" because most risk estimation systems and virtually all drug trials are based on these traditional measures. 2

LDL Treatment Goals by Risk Category

Very High-Risk Patients:

  • Target LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), or at least 50% reduction if baseline LDL-C is between 1.8-3.5 mmol/L (70-135 mg/dL). 1
  • Very high-risk includes documented CVD, diabetes with target organ damage, severe CKD, or calculated very high SCORE risk. 1

High-Risk Patients:

  • Target LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), or at least 50% reduction if baseline LDL-C is between 2.6-5.1 mmol/L (100-200 mg/dL). 1

Moderately High-Risk Patients (≥1 risk factor, 10-20% 10-year risk):

  • Target LDL-C <3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dL), with consideration of <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) as a therapeutic option based on recent trial evidence. 1

Role of HDL/LDL Ratio in Risk Assessment Only

  • The LDL/HDL ratio provides additional risk stratification beyond LDL alone, particularly for identifying patients who may be at higher risk despite seemingly acceptable LDL levels. 2

  • The ratio makes intuitive sense by combining an atherogenic lipoprotein (LDL) with a protective one (HDL), and has been well-supported by observational epidemiology. 2, 3

  • Critical limitation: The LDL/HDL ratio should be used as a marker of increased risk rather than as an index of treatment success or a therapeutic goal. 2

  • European guidelines acknowledge that ratios are "useful for risk estimation, but for diagnosis and as treatment targets the components of the ratio have to be considered separately." 2

Practical Clinical Algorithm

For Initial Risk Assessment:

  1. Measure total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides (fasting). 1, 2
  2. Calculate LDL cholesterol using validated equations (Friedewald if TG <4.5 mmol/L, or Sampson-NIH2 equation if TG up to 9 mmol/L). 4
  3. Calculate total cholesterol/HDL ratio or LDL/HDL ratio for additional risk stratification. 1, 2
  4. Perform Framingham risk scoring or SCORE risk estimation to determine 10-year cardiovascular risk. 1

For Treatment Decisions:

  1. Categorize patient into risk category (very high, high, moderate, or low risk). 1
  2. Set absolute LDL-C target based on risk category—ignore the HDL/LDL ratio for treatment goals. 1, 2
  3. Initiate statin therapy at appropriate intensity to achieve LDL-C goal. 1
  4. Titrate statin to highest tolerable dose to reach target, adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitor if needed. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use the HDL/LDL ratio as a treatment endpoint—this lacks evidence from randomized controlled trials and is explicitly discouraged by European guidelines. 2

  • Even with a favorable HDL/LDL ratio, elevated absolute LDL cholesterol levels still warrant aggressive management according to risk category. 2

  • The ratio must be interpreted as part of a complete lipid profile and overall cardiovascular risk assessment, not in isolation. 2

  • While low HDL cholesterol may rival high LDL cholesterol as a risk factor, there is insufficient evidence to use HDL as a therapeutic target. 2

Additional Considerations for High Triglycerides

  • If triglycerides are ≥150 mg/dL (1.70 mmol/L) or HDL-C is <40 mg/dL (1.05 mmol/L), emphasize weight management, physical activity, and smoking cessation. 1

  • If triglycerides are 200-499 mg/dL (2.26-5.64 mmol/L), target non-HDL cholesterol <130 mg/dL, with consideration of <100 mg/dL. 1

  • Consider adding fibrate or niacin therapy after optimizing LDL-lowering therapy in patients with persistently elevated triglycerides and low HDL. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

LDL/HDL Ratio in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Best practice for LDL-cholesterol: when and how to calculate.

Journal of clinical pathology, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.