Management of Hypoplastic Vertebral Artery Terminating in PICA
A hypoplastic vertebral artery terminating in PICA is a clinically significant anatomic variant that requires conservative medical management with antiplatelet therapy as first-line treatment, with revascularization reserved only for cases where medical therapy fails to control recurrent posterior circulation ischemic symptoms.
Clinical Significance and Risk Assessment
This anatomic variant is more common than previously recognized and carries important hemodynamic implications:
PICA-terminating vertebral arteries occur in approximately 18.7% of patients with posterior circulation cerebrovascular events compared to only 6.3% in healthy controls, indicating this is not merely a benign variant 1
The affected vertebral artery demonstrates compromised hemodynamics with smaller diameter (3.0 ± 0.5 mm vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 mm), lower mean velocity (164 ± 88 mm/sec vs. 241 ± 100 mm/sec), and higher pulsatility index (1.9 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5) compared to normal vertebral arteries 1
Importantly, 73.3% of PICA-terminating vertebral arteries do not meet criteria for hypoplasia (diameter ≤2 mm), meaning this variant has independent clinical significance beyond simple hypoplasia 1
Patients with this variant also demonstrate smaller basilar artery (2.5 ± 0.9 mm vs. 3.2 ± 0.5 mm) and posterior cerebral artery diameters (1.6 ± 0.1 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.1 mm), reflecting compromised posterior circulation hemodynamics 1
Up to 42.4% of patients with vertebral artery hypoplasia show ipsilateral PICA territory hypoperfusion on CT perfusion imaging, even without manifest posterior circulation infarction 2
Primary Medical Management
Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and should be initiated immediately:
Aspirin 75-325 mg daily is first-line therapy for all patients with this anatomic variant, regardless of symptom status 3, 4, 5
For patients with aspirin contraindications or intolerance, clopidogrel 75 mg daily or ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily are reasonable alternatives 5
The combination of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole (200 mg twice daily) provides superior protection, reducing vertebrobasilar territory stroke/TIA from 10.8% to 5.7% compared to placebo 3, 4, 5
Avoid routine dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel) as hemorrhage risk outweighs benefit in this population 4
Acute Ischemic Syndrome Management
If the patient presents with acute posterior circulation stroke:
For patients with angiographic evidence of thrombus in the extracranial vertebral artery, initiate anticoagulation with heparin followed by warfarin for at least 3 months, regardless of whether thrombolytic therapy is used 3, 4, 5
Mechanical thrombectomy should be performed within 12 hours if NIHSS ≥6, PC-ASPECTS ≥6, and age 18-89 years 4
Thrombectomy remains reasonable between 12-24 hours from last known well using the same criteria 4
Novel technique consideration: In cases of basilar artery occlusion with hypoplastic contralateral vertebral artery, proximal balloon occlusion and aspiration of the dominant vertebral artery can achieve recanalization without stent-retrieval 6
Diagnostic Evaluation
Proper imaging is critical to define anatomy and guide management:
MRA or CTA is mandatory over ultrasound for initial evaluation, with 94% sensitivity versus 70% for ultrasound 3, 4, 5
Catheter-based contrast angiography is required before any revascularization procedure, as neither MRA nor CTA reliably delineates vertebral artery origins 3, 4, 5
Evaluate specifically for: vertigo, diplopia, ataxia, bilateral sensory deficits, syncope, perioral numbness, blurred vision, and tinnitus as indicators of posterior circulation ischemia 7, 5
CT perfusion imaging can detect subclinical PICA territory hypoperfusion, with time-to-drain maps showing highest sensitivity (42.4%) followed by mean transit time (39.0%) and cerebral blood flow (25.4%) 2
Revascularization: When and How
Revascularization should only be pursued after medical therapy fails:
Indications: Persistent or recurrent posterior circulation ischemic symptoms despite optimal medical management for at least 3 months 3, 4, 5
Endovascular treatment risks include death (0.3%), periprocedural neurological complications (5.5%), posterior stroke (0.7%), and restenosis in 26% at 12-month follow-up 3, 4, 5
Surgical options include trans-subclavian vertebral endarterectomy, transposition of the vertebral artery to the ipsilateral common carotid artery, and reimplantation with vein graft extension to the subclavian artery 3, 4, 5
For proximal vertebral artery reconstruction, early complication rates range from 2.5% to 25% with perioperative mortality of 0% to 4% 3, 5
Special Surgical Considerations
When this variant is discovered during planned thoracic aortic surgery:
PICA-terminating vertebral arteries must be preserved during aortic arch replacement or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) 8, 9
During TEVAR with Zone-2 proximal landing, debranching bypass should be employed to preserve subclavian perfusion when PICA termination is present 9
In aortic arch replacement, reconstruct the subclavian artery together with the PICA-terminating vertebral artery while maintaining hypothermia 8, 9
Critical pitfall: Simple occlusion of the left subclavian artery may result in brain infarction when the vertebral artery terminates in PICA 9
Approximately 30% of thoracic aortic patients have PICA termination or right-sided hypoplasia/occlusive lesions where left subclavian perfusion is critical for brain protection 9
Long-Term Monitoring
Ongoing surveillance is essential:
Continue indefinite antiplatelet therapy with aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modification 4
Serial noninvasive imaging (MRA or CTA) at intervals similar to carotid revascularization protocols to assess disease progression and exclude new lesions 4, 5
Monitor continuously for recurrent symptoms, as atheroembolism from vertebral artery origin lesions may cause brainstem or cerebellar infarction even when the contralateral vertebral artery is patent 4
Critical Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Never assume this is a benign variant requiring no treatment - the 18.7% prevalence in symptomatic patients versus 6.3% in controls proves clinical significance 1
Do not rely on ultrasound alone for diagnosis - sensitivity is only 70% compared to 94% for MRA/CTA 3, 4, 5
Do not pursue revascularization as first-line therapy - insufficient evidence of benefit over medical management exists 3, 4
Never occlude the ipsilateral subclavian artery during thoracic aortic procedures without reconstruction - this can cause devastating posterior circulation stroke 8, 9