What is the control rate of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung metastasis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SBRT for Lung Metastasis: Control Rates

SBRT achieves excellent local control rates of approximately 85-100% at 1 year and 88-96% at 2 years for lung metastases in oligometastatic patients, with optimal outcomes requiring a biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) of at least 100 Gy. 1, 2, 3

Local Control Rates by Time Point

1-Year Local Control:

  • Non-spinal bone metastases treated with SBRT achieve 94.6% local control at 1 year 4
  • Lung metastases demonstrate 86.7-100% local control at 1 year, with the highest rates observed in multi-institutional prospective trials 1, 2
  • Early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT shows 97% local control at 1 year 4

2-Year Local Control:

  • Non-spinal bone SBRT achieves 88% local control at 2 years 4
  • Lung metastases maintain 86.7-96% local control at 2 years, with variation based on dose delivered 1, 2
  • Early-stage NSCLC demonstrates 88% local control at 2 years 4

Critical Dose-Response Relationship

BED Requirements for Optimal Control:

  • All local failures in one series occurred in patients receiving BED₁₀ <105 Gy, with 75% of local recurrences associated with inadequate dosing 1
  • BED₁₀ >100 Gy is required to achieve >85% local control rates regardless of tumor size 5
  • The therapeutic window of BED₁₀ 105-146 Gy produces the best overall survival and cancer-specific survival at 1-3 years 6
  • BED₁₀ <83.2 Gy or >146 Gy show significantly worse outcomes and should be avoided 6

Common Dose Regimens:

  • 50 Gy in 5 fractions (BED₁₀ = 100 Gy) is recommended for central lung tumors 6, 7
  • 60 Gy in 3 fractions was used in the multi-institutional phase I/II trial achieving 100% 1-year and 96% 2-year local control 2
  • Single-fraction regimens of 16-24 Gy achieve >90% local control rates for appropriately selected lesions 3

Tumor Size Impact on Control Rates

Size-Dependent Outcomes:

  • Tumors <3 cm show 96.2% 2-year local recurrence-free survival with no significant dose-response relationship across BED ranges 5
  • Tumors ≥3 cm demonstrate only 50.0% 2-year local recurrence-free survival and require BED escalation to high levels (>150 Gy) for optimal control 5
  • For stage I NSCLC, local recurrence was 2% for T1 tumors versus 6% for T2 tumors, though this difference was not statistically significant 4

Survival Outcomes

Cancer-Specific Survival:

  • 95.3% at 1 year and 75.2% at 2 years for oligometastatic lung metastases treated with SBRT 1
  • Early-stage NSCLC achieves 93.5% 1-year and 80.7% 2-year cancer-specific survival 4

Overall Survival:

  • 86.7% at 1 year and 60.4% at 2 years for oligometastatic patients with lung metastases 1
  • Median survival of 19 months in multi-institutional phase I/II trial 2

Failure Patterns and Clinical Implications

Primary Failure Mode:

  • Distant progression is the main failure pattern, occurring in 25% of patients after SBRT for lung metastases 1
  • Local progression remains rare when adequate BED is delivered, with only one local failure observed at 13 months in a series achieving 100% 1-year local control 2

Patient Selection Importance:

  • Selection of patients with high probability of remaining oligometastatic is crucial for SBRT efficiency, as 75% of patients had received at least one prior systemic regimen 1, 2
  • Patients with controlled primary tumors, hormone receptor-positive disease, and non-visceral metastases show better outcomes 8

Safety Profile

Toxicity Rates:

  • Grade 3 toxicity occurs in 0-17% of patients, with most toxicities being grade 1-2 2, 3
  • Symptomatic pneumonitis occurs in approximately 2.6% of patients 2
  • No grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related deaths were reported in major prospective trials 2, 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Inadequate Dosing:

  • Never use BED₁₀ <100 Gy for curative intent SBRT, as this is associated with poor local control outcomes 6, 5
  • Avoid conventional low-dose palliative radiation (8 Gy in 1 fraction) for oligometastatic patients with adequate life expectancy, as this achieves <50% 1-year local control 7

Technical Considerations:

  • Avoid SBRT for ultracentral lung tumors where planning target volume overlaps trachea or main bronchi due to prohibitive toxicity risk 6, 7
  • Ensure daily image guidance and advanced dose calculation algorithms are employed for safe dose escalation 6
  • Apply planning organ at risk volume margins for critical serial organs in centrally located tumors 6

References

Research

Lung metastases in oligometastatic patients: outcome with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2015

Research

Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung metastases.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Optimal Biologically Effective Dose for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

SBRT Dose Recommendations by Cancer Type

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

SBRT in Oligometastatic Breast Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.