What are the treatments for Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP), Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC), and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Overview of TTP, ITP, DIC, and HUS with Treatment Approaches

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)

Immediate therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is the cornerstone of TTP treatment and must be initiated emergently, as untreated TTP is fatal. 1, 2

Pathophysiology and Clinical Features

  • TTP results from autoantibody-mediated deficiency of ADAMTS-13, the von Willebrand factor cleaving protease 3, 4
  • Classic pentad includes thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, fever (89%), neurological abnormalities (82.8%), and renal dysfunction (78.5%), though only thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia are mandatory for diagnosis 2
  • Median time to cardiovascular complications is 6 weeks but can range from 2-54 weeks 5

Primary Treatment

  • Daily TPE with 1-1.5 plasma volumes using fresh frozen plasma as replacement fluid should continue until platelet count >150×10⁹/L and LDH normalizes, then slowly taper 2
  • TPE achieves complete response in 85.3% of patients, with median 13-15 sessions required for responders 2
  • Plasma infusion alone is inferior to plasma exchange, with higher failure rates (RR 2.87) and mortality (RR 1.91) 1

Adjunctive and Refractory Treatment

  • Rituximab should be added for refractory TTP, with median response time of 10 days after first dose 6
  • Ten of twelve patients treated with rituximab for refractory TTP responded, with nine remaining relapse-free after median 57+ months follow-up 6
  • For patients with anaphylactic reactions to plasma, substitute with Octaplas (solvent/detergent-treated pooled plasma) or use albumin with slowly increasing plasma amounts 3
  • Corticosteroids combined with TPE reduce mortality compared to TPE alone (3% vs 14%, p<0.001) 2

Critical Distinction from aHUS

  • Distinguishing TTP from atypical HUS is now critical, as eculizumab (approved 2011) treats aHUS but not TTP 4
  • ADAMTS-13 activity testing helps differentiate: severe deficiency (<10%) indicates TTP 4

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

Corticosteroids remain first-line therapy for ITP, with high-dose dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days offering superior response rates (up to 90% initial, 50-80% sustained) compared to conventional prednisone. 7, 8

Treatment Indications and Goals

  • Treat when platelet count <30×10⁹/L with bleeding risk, not to normalize counts 8, 9
  • Target platelet count of 30-50×10⁹/L to reduce bleeding risk 8, 9
  • Treatment rarely needed if platelets >50×10⁹/L unless active bleeding, surgery planned, bleeding comorbidities, or anticoagulation required 7, 8

First-Line Treatment Options

Corticosteroid Regimens:

  • Prednisone 0.5-2 mg/kg/day produces initial response in 70-80% but sustained response in only 20-40% after discontinuation 7, 8, 9
  • High-dose dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days, repeated every 2-4 weeks for 1-4 cycles, achieves 90% initial response and 50-80% sustained response 7
  • Four cycles of dexamethasone every 14 days produced 86% response rate with 74% having responses lasting median 8 months 7
  • Strongly avoid prolonged corticosteroid courses exceeding 6-8 weeks due to substantial morbidity including osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension, avascular necrosis, and opportunistic infections 7

Alternative First-Line:

  • IVIg 1 g/kg single dose should be used with corticosteroids when rapid platelet increase required within 24 hours, or as monotherapy if corticosteroids contraindicated 8, 9
  • IVIg 2 g/kg administered in divided doses per package insert 5
  • IV anti-D 50-75 μg/kg for Rh(D) positive, non-splenectomized patients 5

Second-Line Treatment for Steroid-Refractory ITP

The choice between splenectomy, TPO-RAs, and rituximab depends on ITP duration and patient priorities:

For ITP <12 months duration:

  • Prefer TPO-RAs over rituximab due to greater durability of response with ongoing use 5
  • Delay splenectomy when possible due to potential for spontaneous remission in first year 5

For ITP >12 months duration:

  • For patients avoiding long-term therapy: prefer rituximab over splenectomy despite splenectomy's superior durable response rates, due to operative risks and irreversible nature with long-term infection and thrombosis risks 5
  • For patients preferring medical therapy: prefer TPO-RAs over rituximab due to greater durability of response 5
  • For patients prioritizing durable response: either TPO-RAs or splenectomy are acceptable, with choice based on cost, accessibility, desire to avoid surgery, and desire to avoid long-term medication 5

Specific Second-Line Agents:

  • Splenectomy offers 80% initial response and 66% sustained response for at least 5 years 8, 9
  • TPO-RAs achieve 88% platelet response in non-splenectomized and 79% in splenectomized patients, but monitor for bone marrow reticulin formation 8, 9
  • Rituximab produces sustained response >3-5 years in 15-20% of responders 5
  • Azathioprine 150 mg/day achieves complete response in 45% of patients, though continued therapy generally required 5
  • Cyclosporin A 2.5-3 mg/kg/day produces clinical improvement in >80% with 42% complete response, with mean 29-month durable remissions 5

Special Populations

  • Pregnant patients: use only corticosteroids or IVIg 8, 9
  • HIV-associated ITP: treat HIV with antivirals before other ITP treatments unless clinically significant bleeding 8, 9
  • H. pylori-positive ITP: administer eradication therapy based on urea breath test, stool antigen, or endoscopic biopsy 8, 9
  • Patients on antiplatelet therapy: target platelets >50×10⁹/L to compensate for increased bleeding risk 8, 9

Critical Pitfalls

  • Plasmapheresis has no role in ITP—no chronic ITP patients showed response in studies 5
  • Performing plasmapheresis immediately after IVIG removes immunoglobulin 5
  • Must evaluate for TTP, DIC, and myelodysplastic syndrome when assessing thrombocytopenia 5

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

DIC treatment focuses on addressing the underlying cause while providing supportive care, as no specific therapy reverses the coagulopathy without treating the precipitating condition.

Pathophysiology and Recognition

  • DIC represents consumptive coagulopathy with simultaneous thrombosis and bleeding 5
  • Must be distinguished from ITP and TTP when evaluating thrombocytopenia 5
  • Presents with bleeding manifestations including nose/mouth bleeding, petechiae, and evidence of microvascular thrombosis 5

Treatment Approach

  • Identify and aggressively treat underlying cause (sepsis, malignancy, obstetric complications, trauma)—this is the definitive treatment
  • Transfusion support with platelets, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate based on bleeding severity and laboratory parameters
  • Maintain hemoglobin at minimum 10 g/dL to improve hemostasis 5
  • Desmopressin may improve hemostasis independent of platelet count through direct vascular effects 5

Monitoring

  • Serial coagulation studies including PT/PTT, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and platelet counts
  • Assess for end-organ damage from microvascular thrombosis

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS)

For typical post-diarrheal HUS in children, supportive care alone is the standard treatment, as no intervention has proven superior to supportive therapy. 1

Classification and Clinical Features

  • Typical (post-diarrheal) HUS: follows Shiga toxin-producing bacterial infection, primarily affects children 1
  • Atypical HUS (aHUS): complement-mediated, distinct from TTP, now treated with eculizumab 4
  • Classic triad: microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury 1

Treatment by Type

Post-Diarrheal HUS:

  • Supportive care only: fluid management, electrolyte correction, blood pressure control, and renal replacement therapy if needed 1
  • Seven RCTs in 476 children with post-diarrheal HUS showed no benefit from fresh frozen plasma transfusion, heparin with/without urokinase or dipyridamole, Shiga toxin-binding protein, or steroids over supportive therapy alone 1
  • Monitor for chronic reduced kidney function, persistent proteinuria, and hypertension at follow-up 1

Atypical HUS:

  • Eculizumab (approved 2011) is the specific treatment for aHUS 4
  • Critical to distinguish from TTP, as treatment differs fundamentally 4
  • ADAMTS-13 activity normal in aHUS (vs severely deficient in TTP) 4

Critical Distinction from TTP

  • Both present with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia 1, 4
  • TTP requires immediate plasma exchange; aHUS requires eculizumab 4
  • ADAMTS-13 testing is essential for differentiation 4
  • Plasma exchange showed no benefit in post-diarrheal HUS 1

Outcomes

  • Post-diarrheal HUS outcomes measured by all-cause mortality, chronic reduced kidney function, and persistent proteinuria/hypertension 1
  • Most children with typical HUS recover with supportive care alone 1

References

Research

Interventions for hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2009

Research

Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a retrospective multicenter study.

Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2013

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pulse Therapy Regimens for Severe Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.