Efficacy of Flu Antivirals
Flu antivirals are moderately effective medications that reduce illness duration by approximately 1-1.5 days when started within 48 hours of symptom onset, but their most important benefit is a 50% reduction in serious complications like pneumonia and significant mortality reduction in hospitalized patients, making them most valuable for high-risk and severely ill individuals rather than routine use in otherwise healthy people. 1, 2
Treatment Efficacy: Symptom Reduction
When initiated within 48 hours of symptom onset, both oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza) demonstrate the following benefits:
- Reduce illness duration by 0.7-1.5 days in otherwise healthy adults 3, 2, 4
- Shorten symptoms by 17.6 hours in children (29.9 hours when excluding children with asthma) 1
- Reduce illness severity by up to 38% compared to placebo when started early 2, 5
- Greatest benefit occurs when treatment begins within 30-36 hours of symptom onset, with diminishing returns after 48 hours 3, 5
The modest symptom reduction in otherwise healthy individuals is why general use for uncomplicated influenza is not strongly recommended. 3, 6
Most Important Benefit: Reduction in Serious Complications
The critical value of antivirals lies in preventing severe outcomes, not just shortening symptoms:
- 50% reduction in pneumonia risk in patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza 3, 1, 2
- 34% reduction in otitis media in children 1, 2
- Significant mortality benefit in hospitalized patients (odds ratio 0.21 for death within 15 days), even when treatment starts beyond 48 hours 1, 2
- Reduced hospital length of stay: 4 days when treated within 48 hours versus 6 days when treated after 48 hours 3
Prophylaxis Efficacy
When used preventively, antivirals demonstrate strong protective effects:
- 70-90% protective efficacy for seasonal prophylaxis in unvaccinated healthy adults (oseltamivir 75 mg once daily for 6 weeks) 3, 2, 5
- 68-89% efficacy for post-exposure household prophylaxis when started within 48 hours of exposure 3, 1, 2
- 92% reduction in influenza illness in nursing home residents during a 6-week prophylaxis study 3
- Zanamivir shows similar efficacy: 84% for seasonal prophylaxis and 72-82% for household prophylaxis 3, 7
Important Distinction: Influenza A vs. B
Oseltamivir appears less effective against influenza B compared to influenza A:
- Japanese observational studies showed children with influenza A resolved fever and stopped viral shedding more quickly than those with influenza B when treated with oseltamivir 3, 2
- Zanamivir demonstrates equal effectiveness against both influenza A and B 2, 8
- Consider zanamivir preferentially during confirmed influenza B outbreaks 8
Who Benefits Most from Treatment
High-risk and severely ill patients derive the greatest benefit, even when treatment starts beyond 48 hours:
- Hospitalized patients with severe influenza 3, 1
- Immunocompromised individuals (including those on long-term corticosteroids) 1
- Elderly patients (≥65 years) 1
- Pregnant women 1
- Children under 2 years of age 1
- Patients with chronic cardiac, pulmonary, or other chronic diseases 3, 1
For these populations, treatment should be initiated immediately based on clinical suspicion during flu season without waiting for laboratory confirmation, as delays reduce effectiveness. 1, 2
Adverse Effects
Common side effects are generally mild and transient:
- Oseltamivir: Nausea (3.66% increased risk) and vomiting (4.56% increased risk), reduced when taken with food 1, 2, 5
- Zanamivir: Upper respiratory symptoms, risk of bronchospasm in patients with underlying airways disease (asthma, COPD) 7, 9
- Vomiting in children occurs in approximately 15% versus 9% on placebo, but rarely leads to discontinuation 1
- No established link between oseltamivir and neuropsychiatric events 1
Critical Limitations and Caveats
Zanamivir is contraindicated in patients with underlying airways disease (asthma, COPD) due to risk of serious bronchospasm and lack of proven efficacy in this population. 7
Antivirals are not a substitute for annual influenza vaccination, which remains the primary prevention strategy. 3, 2, 7
Resistance considerations: Oseltamivir resistance remains low (<5% in the United States for current strains), but resistance can develop during treatment, particularly with influenza A (H1N1) at 27% versus 3% for H3N2 and 0% for influenza B. 2
Rapid influenza tests have poor sensitivity—negative results should not exclude treatment in high-risk patients during influenza season. 1, 2
Practical Dosing
Treatment dosing:
- Adults/adolescents ≥13 years: 75 mg twice daily for 5 days 1, 2
- Children (weight-based): ≤15 kg: 30 mg; >15-23 kg: 45 mg; >23-40 kg: 60 mg; >40 kg: 75 mg, all twice daily for 5 days 1, 2
- Zanamivir: 10 mg (two 5-mg inhalations) twice daily for 5 days 7
Prophylaxis dosing:
- Same doses as treatment but once daily instead of twice daily 1, 2
- Duration: 10 days for household prophylaxis, up to 28 days for seasonal prophylaxis 3, 7
Bottom Line for Clinical Practice
For otherwise healthy individuals with uncomplicated influenza, the benefit is modest (approximately 1 day symptom reduction) and general use is not strongly recommended. 3, 6
For high-risk, severely ill, or hospitalized patients, antivirals provide substantial benefit through reduced complications and mortality, and should be initiated immediately regardless of time since symptom onset. 1, 2 This mortality benefit persists even when treatment begins 48-96 hours after illness onset. 1
For prophylaxis, antivirals are highly effective (70-90% protection) but should be used as adjuncts to vaccination, not replacements, particularly for post-exposure household contacts of high-risk individuals and during institutional outbreaks. 3, 2, 5