What diagnosis do I use for bacterial vaginosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis

Use the Amsel clinical criteria to diagnose bacterial vaginosis—you need at least 3 of the 4 findings: homogeneous white discharge coating the vaginal walls, vaginal pH >4.5, positive whiff test (fishy odor with KOH), and clue cells on saline wet mount microscopy. 1, 2

Clinical Diagnostic Approach

The CDC explicitly endorses clinical diagnosis without waiting for laboratory confirmation, allowing you to diagnose and treat based on bedside findings alone 1. This is the standard approach in clinical practice.

The Four Amsel Criteria (Need 3 of 4):

  1. Homogeneous white discharge that smoothly coats and adheres to the vaginal walls 3, 2
  2. Vaginal pH greater than 4.5 measured with narrow-range pH paper 3, 2
  3. Positive whiff test: fishy amine odor detected immediately before or after adding 10% KOH solution to vaginal discharge 3, 2
  4. Clue cells present on microscopic examination of saline wet mount—these are vaginal epithelial cells covered with adherent bacteria (mostly coccobacilli) 3, 4

Alternative Diagnostic Method

Gram stain can be used instead of Amsel criteria by determining the relative concentration of bacterial morphotypes characteristic of BV's altered flora 3, 5. This method is more objective and reproducible with 62-100% sensitivity and 76-100% positive predictive value 6. However, Gram stain is typically reserved for research settings or when microscopy expertise is limited 6.

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not culture for Gardnerella vaginalis—this is not recommended because G. vaginalis can be isolated from 50% of normal women, making it completely non-specific 3, 1, 2
  • Remember that 50% of women meeting diagnostic criteria are asymptomatic, so the absence of symptoms does not rule out BV 3, 2, 4
  • Laboratory testing fails to identify a cause in a substantial minority of women with vaginal symptoms, so negative findings don't always exclude pathology 3, 5

Practical Examination Technique

Perform the wet mount by diluting vaginal discharge in 1-2 drops of 0.9% normal saline on one slide and 10% KOH on a second slide 3. Apply the whiff test by smelling for amine odor immediately after adding KOH 3. Examine both slides under microscope at low- and high-dry power—clue cells are usually easily identified in the saline specimen 3.

When Molecular Testing May Be Considered

While Amsel criteria remain the standard, molecular techniques are gaining relevance when wet mount microscopy is unavailable, when the examiner is inexperienced at recognizing clue cells, or when differential diagnosis of polymicrobial vaginal infections is needed 7, 6. However, these are not required for routine diagnosis.

References

Guideline

Empiric Treatment for Bacterial Vaginosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Bacterial Vaginosis Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Bacterial vaginosis. Epidemiology and risk factors].

Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo, 2000

Guideline

Treatment of Indeterminate Bacterial Vaginosis Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnostic microbiology of bacterial vaginosis.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1993

Research

Molecular Testing for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis.

International journal of molecular sciences, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.