What is Ensifetrine?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What is Ensifentrine?

Ensifentrine is a novel, first-in-class inhaled dual phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3 and 4 inhibitor approved for maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that provides both bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory effects through nebulized administration. 1, 2

Mechanism of Action

Ensifentrine works through selective dual inhibition of two distinct enzyme pathways 2:

  • PDE3 inhibition produces bronchodilation by relaxing airway smooth muscle, similar to how milrinone works in heart failure 3, 2
  • PDE4 inhibition reduces airway inflammation by decreasing inflammatory mediator release from immune cells 2
  • Combined effect on ciliary function improves mucociliary clearance in bronchial epithelia, helping patients clear secretions more effectively 2

This dual mechanism distinguishes ensifentrine from single-target bronchodilators like LABAs (which only target β2-receptors) or LAMAs (which only block muscarinic receptors). 2

Clinical Efficacy

Lung Function Improvements

The pivotal ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2 Phase III trials demonstrated consistent bronchodilation 4:

  • FEV1 improvement of 87-94 mL versus placebo at 12 hours post-dose (both trials P < 0.001) 4
  • Trough FEV1 increased by approximately 41 mL at week 12, indicating sustained bronchodilation between doses 5
  • These improvements occurred in patients with moderate to severe COPD (baseline FEV1 51-52% predicted) 4

Symptom and Quality of Life Benefits

Ensifentrine demonstrated early and progressive symptom relief 1, 4:

  • Breathlessness improved from Week 2 onwards across all doses tested (P < 0.05), with the greatest effect on the dyspnea component of symptoms 1
  • Transition Dyspnea Index scores increased by 0.96 points at 24 weeks, indicating meaningful improvement in breathlessness 5
  • E-RS:COPD total scores decreased by 0.81 points at 24 weeks, reflecting overall symptom reduction 5
  • The respiratory symptoms domain of quality of life showed the most pronounced improvement, though total SGRQ-C scores showed variable results between trials 1, 4

Exacerbation Reduction

A critical finding was ensifentrine's impact on disease stability 4, 6:

  • 43-48% reduction in moderate or severe exacerbation rates across both ENHANCE trials (rate ratios 0.57-0.64, P ≤ 0.050) 4
  • 38-42% reduction in time to first exacerbation (hazard ratios 0.58-0.62, P ≤ 0.038) 4
  • These benefits occurred even when added to existing LAMA or LABA+ICS therapy, suggesting complementary mechanisms 6

Administration and Dosing

Ensifentrine 3 mg is administered twice daily via standard jet nebulizer over approximately 5-7 minutes 4, 6:

  • The nebulized route ensures direct delivery to airways with minimal systemic exposure 2
  • Doses ranging from 0.75-6 mg were studied, with 3 mg selected for Phase III trials based on optimal efficacy-to-tolerability ratio 1, 2
  • Higher doses (6 mg) showed numerically greater effects but were not pursued in pivotal trials 1

Use with Existing COPD Therapies

Ensifentrine can be added to current maintenance treatments without dose adjustments 4, 6:

  • In ENHANCE trials, 69% of patients were on concomitant LAMAs and 55% on LABAs, demonstrating compatibility with standard care 4
  • Subgroup analysis showed consistent lung function improvements when added to LAMA (92 mL FEV1 increase) or LABA+ICS (74 mL increase) 6
  • Exacerbation reductions were similar whether added to LAMA (48% reduction) or LABA+ICS (51% reduction) 6

This represents a distinct advantage over oral PDE4 inhibitors like roflumilast, which have significant systemic side effects and are typically reserved for severe COPD with frequent exacerbations. 2

Safety Profile

Ensifentrine demonstrated a favorable safety profile comparable to placebo 4, 6:

  • Adverse event rates were similar between ensifentrine and placebo groups across all trials 4
  • Unlike oral PDE4 inhibitors, ensifentrine did not show the typical class effects of nausea, diarrhea, or weight loss that limit tolerability of systemic PDE4 inhibition 2, 4
  • The inhaled route minimizes systemic exposure while maximizing local airway effects 2

Important Safety Distinction

The FDA drug label information provided in the evidence 7 refers to isoniazid (INH), an antituberculosis medication, not ensifentrine. This appears to be a database error. Ensifentrine has no relation to tuberculosis treatment and does not carry the hepatotoxicity warnings or contraindications associated with isoniazid. 2, 4

Patient Population

Ensifentrine is indicated for patients with moderate to severe COPD who remain symptomatic 4, 5:

  • Appropriate for patients aged 40-80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV1 40-80% predicted 1, 4
  • Particularly beneficial for patients experiencing persistent dyspnea despite LAMA or LABA+ICS therapy 6
  • Can be considered for patients with recurrent exacerbations requiring additional preventive therapy 4

Clinical Positioning

Ensifentrine fills a therapeutic gap by providing a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory option with bronchodilator effects that can be added to existing inhaled therapies 6, 5:

  • Unlike inhaled corticosteroids, it provides anti-inflammatory effects without steroid-related risks (pneumonia, oral candidiasis, bone density loss) 6
  • Unlike oral PDE4 inhibitors, it avoids gastrointestinal side effects through targeted pulmonary delivery 2
  • The nebulized delivery may benefit patients with poor inhaler technique or those already using nebulizers for other medications 2

Evidence Quality

The evidence base for ensifentrine consists of two large, well-designed Phase III trials (ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2) with 1,549 patients, supported by earlier Phase II dose-ranging studies 1, 4. The consistency of results across both pivotal trials, particularly for lung function and exacerbation outcomes, provides high-quality evidence for its efficacy. 4, 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.