Iron Infusion for Restless Legs Syndrome
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine strongly recommends IV ferric carboxymaltose (1000 mg) as first-line iron therapy for RLS patients with ferritin ≤75 ng/mL or transferrin saturation <20%, with moderate certainty of evidence. 1, 2
Mandatory Pre-Treatment Assessment
Before any iron therapy, you must check serum ferritin and transferrin saturation in all patients with clinically significant RLS 1, 3:
- Draw blood in the morning after fasting 2, 3
- Patient must avoid iron-containing supplements and foods for at least 24 hours before testing 2, 3
- These RLS-specific thresholds differ from general population cutoffs 2, 3
Treatment Algorithm Based on Iron Status
Ferritin ≤75 ng/mL OR Transferrin Saturation <20%
First-line options (choose one):
IV ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg (strong recommendation, moderate certainty) 1, 2, 4
- Administered as single dose per course for patients ≥50 kg 5
- Can be given undiluted as slow IV push over 15 minutes OR diluted in ≤250 mL normal saline (concentration ≥2 mg iron/mL) infused over ≥15 minutes 5
- Superior to oral iron due to better CNS penetration via H-ferritin binding and macrophage iron uptake 2
Oral ferrous sulfate 65 mg elemental iron daily (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty) 1, 2, 3
Alternative IV formulations (conditional recommendations):
IV low molecular weight iron dextran (very low certainty) 1, 2
IV ferumoxytol (very low certainty, based on observational data) 1, 2
Ferritin 75-100 ng/mL
Use IV iron formulations ONLY 2, 3:
- Oral iron is poorly absorbed and ineffective in this range 2, 3
- IV ferric carboxymaltose remains the preferred option 2
Ferritin >100 ng/mL
Iron supplementation generally not indicated based on current evidence 2
Special Populations
End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
- IV iron sucrose if ferritin <200 ng/mL AND transferrin saturation <20% (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty) 1, 3
- Iron dextran 1000 mg showed significant symptom reduction at 2 weeks in ESRD patients (median improvement -3 points; P=0.01) 7
Pediatric Patients
- Iron supplementation recommended when ferritin <50 ng/mL 1, 3
- IV iron sucrose (average dose 3.6 mg/kg over 2 hours) showed improved sleep in 62.5% of children who failed oral iron 8
- Monitor for constipation with oral formulations 1
Why RLS Requires Higher Iron Thresholds
Brain iron deficiency plays a central role in RLS pathophysiology, even when serum iron appears normal by general population standards 2, 3. RLS patients require ferritin ≥50-75 ng/mL for optimal neurological function and CNS iron availability 2, 3. The slow-release, higher-dose IV formulations enable the H-ferritin binding necessary for CNS penetration, unlike fast-release formulations 2.
Monitoring and Repeat Treatment
- Continue iron therapy indefinitely with ongoing monitoring, as RLS symptoms may recur if iron stores decline 1
- Check serum phosphate levels in patients requiring repeat courses within 3 months 5
- Maintenance surveillance with iron studies every 6-12 months, even with symptom resolution 1
- For heart failure patients with iron deficiency, administer maintenance dose of 500 mg at 12,24, and 36 weeks if ferritin <100 ng/mL or ferritin 100-300 ng/mL with transferrin saturation <20% 5
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use general population ferritin cutoffs (<15-30 ng/mL) for RLS—this misses the majority of patients who would benefit 2, 3
- Do not assume all IV iron formulations are equivalent—iron sucrose lacks efficacy except in dialysis patients 2, 3
- Never test iron studies while patient is taking supplements—wait at least 24 hours after last iron-containing product 2, 3
- Avoid oral iron for ferritin 75-100 ng/mL—it will be ineffective due to poor absorption 2, 3
- Monitor for extravasation during IV administration—brown discoloration may be long-lasting 5
Safety Profile
Meta-analysis showed adverse events did not differ significantly between IV iron and placebo (OR 1.68,95% CI 0.92-3.07, P=0.093) 4. Iron therapy overall did not result in significantly more side effects than placebo (RR 1.39,95% CI 0.85-2.27) 9.