Diabetes Interventions That Reduce All-Cause Mortality
Metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists all reduce all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, with metformin showing the strongest long-term survival benefit, followed by SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, while DPP-4 inhibitors, insulin, and sulfonylureas do not reduce mortality. 1, 2
First-Line Therapy: Metformin
Metformin is the mandatory first-line pharmacologic therapy for all patients with type 2 diabetes unless contraindicated. 2, 3
In the UKPDS 34 trial, metformin reduced all-cause mortality by 36% (relative risk reduction, 9% to 55%, P = 0.011), translating to approximately 7 fewer deaths per 1000 patient-years compared to conventional therapy. 1
On extended 17-year follow-up, metformin maintained a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality (7.2 deaths per 1000 patient-years, P = 0.002). 1
A 2024 meta-analysis comparing metformin directly to SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular disease found metformin offered 23.26 months of survival free from all-cause mortality versus 23.04 months with SGLT-2 inhibitors, with SGLT-2 inhibitors showing higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.308,95% CI 1.103-1.550) compared to metformin. 4
Metformin reduces all-cause mortality compared to sulfonylureas, with observational data showing patients on metformin had longer survival than matched non-diabetic controls, while those on sulfonylureas had markedly reduced survival. 1, 5
Second-Line Therapy: SGLT-2 Inhibitors
When glycemic control remains inadequate on metformin, add an SGLT-2 inhibitor as the preferred second-line agent. 2, 3
SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care (high certainty of evidence). 1
SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce all-cause mortality compared to insulin (low to moderate certainty of evidence). 1
Prioritize SGLT-2 inhibitors specifically in patients with congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or when cardiovascular mortality reduction is the primary goal. 2, 3
SGLT-2 inhibitors also reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (moderate to high certainty), progression of chronic kidney disease (high certainty), and heart failure hospitalizations (high certainty). 1, 2
SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce severe hypoglycemia compared to sulfonylureas and insulin (low to high certainty). 1
Alternative Second-Line Therapy: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
GLP-1 receptor agonists are an alternative second-line option when SGLT-2 inhibitors are not preferred. 2, 3
GLP-1 agonists reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care (high certainty of evidence). 1
GLP-1 agonists reduce all-cause mortality compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (moderate certainty of evidence). 1
Prioritize GLP-1 agonists specifically in patients with increased stroke risk or when weight loss is an important treatment goal. 2, 3
GLP-1 agonists also reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (moderate to high certainty) and stroke (high certainty). 1, 2
GLP-1 agonists reduce severe hypoglycemia compared to sulfonylureas and insulin (low to high certainty). 1
Therapies That Do NOT Reduce All-Cause Mortality
The following interventions do not reduce all-cause mortality and should not be selected for this outcome:
DPP-4 inhibitors do not reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care (low to high certainty of evidence). 1
Insulin does not reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care (low to high certainty of evidence). 1
Tirzepatide does not reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care (low to high certainty of evidence). 1
Intensive glycemic control with sulfonylureas or insulin showed no reduction in all-cause mortality in the VADT trial (HR 1.05,95% CI 0.89-1.25). 1
The UKPDS 33 trial of intensive therapy with sulfonylureas or insulin versus conventional therapy showed only a 6% relative reduction in all-cause mortality that was not statistically significant (P = 0.44). 1
Critical Safety Consideration
When SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists achieve adequate glycemic control, reduce or discontinue sulfonylureas or long-acting insulins to minimize severe hypoglycemia risk. 2, 3
Hypoglycemic events were much more common with intensive therapy using sulfonylureas or insulin (approximately 30% vs. 1% annually in UKPDS trials). 1
The VADT trial showed a 3-fold higher rate of hypoglycemic episodes with impaired consciousness in the intensive therapy group (9 vs. 3 episodes per 100 patient-years). 1
Early addition of metformin to sulfonylureas resulted in an increased risk for diabetes-related death (P = 0.039) compared with continued treatment with sulfonylureas alone. 1
Practical Implementation Algorithm
Start all patients on metformin (unless contraindicated) plus lifestyle modifications. 2, 3
If glycemic control remains inadequate after 3 months, add either an SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist based on:
When adding SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist, reduce or discontinue sulfonylureas or insulin to prevent hypoglycemia. 2, 3
Never add DPP-4 inhibitors for mortality reduction—they provide no benefit. 1, 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely on intensive glycemic control alone (targeting very low HbA1c) to reduce mortality—the VADT and UKPDS 33 trials showed this approach does not reduce all-cause mortality and increases hypoglycemia risk. 1
Do not combine metformin with sulfonylureas early as this increases diabetes-related death. 1
Do not use sulfonylureas or insulin as second-line agents when mortality reduction is the goal—they are inferior to SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists. 2, 3
Monitor for vitamin B12 deficiency with long-term metformin use, especially in patients with anemia or peripheral neuropathy. 2