How to interpret a cervical spine X-ray (X-ray)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Interpret a Cervical Spine X-ray

For trauma evaluation, obtain a three-view cervical spine series (cross-table lateral, open-mouth odontoid, and anteroposterior views), but recognize that this approach has significant limitations with only 89.4% sensitivity for detecting injuries, and CT is now the gold standard for suspected cervical spine trauma. 1, 2, 3

Essential Views and Their Limitations

The Three-View Cervical Trauma Series

The standard radiographic evaluation consists of: 1

  • Cross-table lateral view - Must visualize from the craniocervical junction (occipito-atlantal articulation) to the cervicothoracic junction, including all seven cervical vertebrae and the C7-T1 interspace 1, 4
  • Open-mouth odontoid view - Evaluates the upper cervical spine, though frequently compromised by anterior artifacts from endotracheal tubes, gastric tubes, and cervical collars 1
  • Anteroposterior (AP) view - Adds minimal diagnostic value, as no injuries are detected on AP view that aren't visible on lateral or odontoid views 5

Critical Performance Limitations

The lateral view alone detects only 73.4-89.7% of cervical injuries, missing approximately 15% even when interpreted by experts. 1 In the landmark NEXUS study of 34,069 trauma patients, an adequate three-view series had only 89.4% sensitivity (95% CI: 86.9-91.4%), meaning 2.81% of all injuries may be missed. 1

The most common reason for missed cervical spine injuries is technically inadequate radiographs - up to 49% of cases fail to visualize the cervicothoracic junction where 60% of cervical injuries occur. 1, 4

Systematic Approach to Reading Cervical Spine X-rays

The "ABCs" Method 6

Evaluate sequentially:

  • Alignment - Check anterior vertebral line, posterior vertebral line, spinolaminar line, and posterior spinous process alignment 6
  • Bony integrity - Examine each vertebral body, pedicles, facets, and spinous processes for fractures 6
  • Cartilaginous structures - Assess disc spaces and facet joints 6
  • Soft tissues - Measure prevertebral soft tissue spaces 1

Soft Tissue Measurements

Prevertebral soft tissue thickening has high specificity but low sensitivity for cervical injury: 1

  • >6 mm at C3 - Only 59% sensitivity for actual cervical injury
  • >22 mm at C6 - Only 5% sensitivity for actual cervical injury

Critical pitfall: These measurements become unreliable after endotracheal intubation, gastric tube placement, or while wearing a cervical collar. 1

When X-rays Are Insufficient

Indications for CT Instead of X-rays

CT cervical spine without contrast is now the gold standard for trauma evaluation, with 88.6-100% sensitivity compared to X-ray's 36.4% sensitivity. 2, 3, 7 CT detects three times more fractures than plain radiographs. 3

Obtain CT instead of X-rays when: 2, 3

  • Altered level of consciousness or obtunded patients (X-ray sensitivity drops to only 51.7% for unstable injuries) 1
  • Age ≥65 years (NEXUS criteria have reduced sensitivity of 66-89% in older adults) 2
  • Focal neurologic deficits present 2
  • High-energy mechanism of injury 2
  • Intoxication 2
  • Painful distracting injury 2
  • Inability to actively rotate neck 45° bilaterally 2

Pediatric Considerations

In children, two or more radiographic views detect cervical spine injuries with 90% sensitivity (95% CI: 85-94%), but lateral view alone has only 73% sensitivity. 1 However, CT remains superior with 81-100% sensitivity in pediatric patients. 1

Important pediatric pitfalls: Normal variants in children <8 years (pseudosubluxation of C2-C3, absence of lordosis, C3 vertebral wedging, widened atlantodental interval) can mimic injury and adversely affect interpretation accuracy. 1

Role of MRI

MRI is superior for soft-tissue injuries (ligaments, cord contusion, epidural hematoma, disc herniation) with 88.5% sensitivity and 96.9% specificity. 3

Obtain MRI when: 1, 2, 3

  • Neurological deficits present despite negative CT
  • Suspected ligamentous injury
  • Persistent neck pain despite negative CT
  • Obtunded patients with negative CT (to evaluate for ligamentous injury)

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely on X-rays alone in obtunded patients - sensitivity drops to 51.7% for unstable injuries 1
  • Never accept inadequate visualization of C7-T1 - arm traction only reveals the cervicothoracic junction in 7.7% of cases when initially not visible 1
  • Never ignore persistent symptoms with normal X-rays - 10-20% of missed injuries result from misinterpretation of suboptimal radiographs 1
  • Never skip MRI in neurologically symptomatic patients - CT misses critical soft-tissue injuries requiring surgical intervention 3

Non-Trauma Cervical Spine Imaging

For acute neck pain without trauma or "red flag" symptoms, radiographs are often unnecessary and do not influence management or improve clinical outcomes. 1 MRI is not useful as first-line imaging in the absence of red flag symptoms due to high rates of abnormalities in asymptomatic patients. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

CT Indications for Cervical Spine After Motor Vehicle Collision

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Imaging for Cervical Spine Pathology

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Cervical spine radiographs in the trauma patient.

American family physician, 1999

Research

Essentiality of the lateral cervical spine radiograph.

Annals of emergency medicine, 1981

Research

X-ray vs. CT in identifying significant C-spine injuries in the pediatric population.

Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.