What is the role of plasmapheresis in the management of acute liver failure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Plasmapheresis in Acute Liver Failure

Plasmapheresis is recommended as a bridging therapy to liver transplantation in acute liver failure, particularly for Wilson disease-related cases, where it can acutely lower serum copper and limit hemolysis while awaiting definitive transplantation. 1

Primary Indication: Wilson Disease-Related ALF

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases specifically recommends plasmapheresis (or plasma exchange) as part of the treatment strategy for Wilson disease-related acute liver failure, where it serves to acutely lower serum copper and limit further hemolysis. 2, 1 This is critical because Wilson disease-related ALF is considered uniformly fatal without transplantation, and plasmapheresis can protect the kidneys from copper-mediated tubular damage while awaiting transplant. 1

Alternative liver support systems including albumin dialysis and continuous hemofiltration are equally acceptable options for copper reduction in Wilson disease. 2, 1

Role as Bridging Therapy

Plasmapheresis functions primarily as a temporizing measure rather than definitive treatment:

  • It can stabilize patients and delay (though not eliminate) the need for transplantation. 1
  • High-volume plasmapheresis (HVP), defined as exchange of 8-12 L or 15% of ideal body weight with fresh-frozen plasma, increases the time window to obtain a donor liver and optimizes conditions for the surgical procedure. 3
  • In patients awaiting emergency liver transplantation, daily plasmapheresis prevented irreversible neurological complications for 48-144 hours until transplantation could be performed. 3

Evidence for Broader ALF Applications

While guidelines specifically endorse plasmapheresis for Wilson disease, emerging research suggests potential benefits in other ALF contexts:

  • High-volume plasmapheresis improves biochemical parameters, volume status, and hemodynamics in ALF patients. 4, 5
  • The procedure clears inflammatory cytokines, damage-associated molecular patterns, and endotoxin. 6
  • Early initiation of HVP may provide benefit in ALF patients who do not qualify for liver transplant. 4
  • In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), plasma exchange improved systemic inflammation, reduced multiorgan failure development, and provided survival benefit over other modalities. 6

Practical Implementation

When using plasmapheresis in ALF:

  • Perform high-volume exchanges (8-12 L) with fresh-frozen plasma replacement. 3
  • Continue daily treatments until transplantation or clinical improvement. 3
  • The procedure is readily available in most hospitals, making it accessible when specialized liver support systems are unavailable. 4, 5
  • Monitor for improvement in hepatic encephalopathy grade, coagulation parameters (Factor VII, prothrombin), and bilirubin levels. 7

Critical Caveats

Plasmapheresis should be used very cautiously in patients with severe HCV liver disease, and HCV/HBV infection evolution should be carefully monitored, particularly when combined with immunosuppressants. 2 This warning comes from cryoglobulinemia management guidelines but applies to any apheresis use in viral hepatitis contexts.

The procedure does not replace liver transplantation as definitive therapy—it only extends the window for obtaining a donor organ. 3 All patients receiving plasmapheresis for ALF should be simultaneously listed for transplantation unless contraindications exist. 1

Comparison to Other Liver Support Systems

The Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) and other sorbent-based systems have been tested but show only transient improvement in hepatic encephalopathy without clear long-term benefit. 2 Plasmapheresis appears superior to Fractional Plasma Separation and Adsorption (FPSA) with fewer adverse effects and better survival outcomes in ACLF. 6

References

Guideline

Acute Liver Failure Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Therapeutic plasma-exchange improves systemic inflammation and survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure: A propensity-score matched study from AARC.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2021

Research

[Treatment of acute liver failure by plasmapheresis].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1983

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.