What are the A ring and B ring in the esophagus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Esophageal A Ring and B Ring: Anatomic Definitions

The B ring (Schatzki ring) is a clinically significant annular constriction at the gastroesophageal mucosal junction covered proximally by squamous epithelium and distally by gastric mucosa, while the A ring is a less common muscular ring located at the junction of the tubular esophagus and esophageal vestibule, approximately 2 cm above the B ring. 1, 2

Anatomic Location and Structure

B Ring (Schatzki Ring)

  • Located precisely at the gastroesophageal mucosal junction (squamocolumnar junction) where squamous esophageal epithelium transitions to gastric columnar mucosa 1
  • Represents the most clinically relevant esophageal ring, occurring in 6-14% of barium swallow examinations 1
  • Found only in patients with cephalad displacement of the esophagogastric junction (hiatal hernia) and appears as a sharply circumferentially marginated transition 3

A Ring (Muscular Ring)

  • Positioned at the junction between the tubular esophagus and the esophageal vestibule, approximately 2 cm proximal to the B ring 2
  • Identified in only about 5% of videofluoroscopic esophagrams, making it a relatively uncommon finding 2
  • Represents a muscular contraction rather than a fixed mucosal structure 2

Clinical Significance

B Ring Pathophysiology

  • Dysphagia follows "Schatzki's rule": symptoms are usual with ring diameters ≤13 mm, rarely occur if diameter exceeds 20 mm, with a "grey area" between 13-20 mm 1
  • Most common cause of intermittent dysphagia for solids and food bolus obstruction 1
  • Associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis 1
  • Postulated to develop from mucosal infolding at the esophagogastric junction during esophageal shortening, with subsequent fibrosis creating a fixed organic diaphragm 3

A Ring Pathophysiology

  • Associated with more severe gastroesophageal reflux, with mean DeMeester pH scores of 48.9 in patients with A rings versus 15.4 in controls 2
  • Patients with A rings demonstrate significantly higher total percentage of time with pH < 4 (26.4% versus 7.7%) 2
  • 70% of patients with A rings have erosive esophagitis compared to only 10% without A rings 2
  • May represent either a compensatory mechanism to protect against reflux or an inflammatory consequence of peptic esophagitis 2

Diagnostic Detection

Optimal Imaging Techniques

  • Biphasic esophagram is superior to endoscopy for detecting lower esophageal rings, with 95% detection rate compared to 76% for endoscopy 4
  • Prone single-contrast views with continuous drinking of low-density barium are 2-3 times more likely to detect lower esophageal rings than upright double-contrast views due to better distal esophageal distention 4
  • B rings may not be visible during endoscopy unless the gastroesophageal junction is adequately distended by air insufflation 1

Critical Diagnostic Pitfall

  • Always exclude eosinophilic esophagitis by obtaining distal, mid, and proximal esophageal biopsies in symptomatic patients, as circular rings in eosinophilic esophagitis can mimic Schatzki rings 1, 5
  • Look for additional endoscopic features including longitudinal furrowing, whitish exudates, edema, narrow-caliber esophagus, and "crêpe paper" mucosa 5
  • 30% of eosinophilic esophagitis cases have normal-appearing mucosa endoscopically, making biopsies essential 5

References

Guideline

Diagnosis and Treatment of Schatzki Rings

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Biphasic Esophagram Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Considerations in Histamine Intolerance

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.