Are the odds of developing acute kidney injury low with a Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) level of 213 at 9 hours post-injury?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury with CPK 213 at 9 Hours Post-Injury

With a CPK of 213 U/L at 9 hours post-injury, the odds of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) are very low, as this level is well below the diagnostic threshold for rhabdomyolysis and falls within the range where AKI risk is minimal.

Understanding CPK Kinetics and Timing

The 9-hour timepoint is critical to interpret correctly:

  • CPK levels do not peak within the first few hours but rather between 24-120 hours after the injury or exercise event 1
  • At 9 hours post-injury, CPK levels are typically still rising and have not reached their maximum 1
  • The optimal time to assess peak CPK levels is 24-120 hours after the event, not at 9 hours 1

Risk Stratification Based on CPK Levels

Your current CPK of 213 U/L indicates minimal risk:

  • Rhabdomyolysis is diagnosed when CPK exceeds 1,000 U/L (five times the upper limit of normal) 2
  • CPK levels above 5,000 U/L are associated with increased risk of requiring renal replacement therapy or mortality 3
  • In crush syndrome specifically, CPK levels above 75,000 U/L correlate with >80% incidence of AKI 2
  • Exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis can produce CPK levels >3,000 U/L, with levels of 3,000-5,000 U/L considered pathological and associated with increased AKI risk 1

Clinical Context Matters

The rate of CPK rise is an important predictor:

  • A CK elevation rate >1,000 U/L/hour is independently associated with AKI in trauma patients 4
  • At your current level of 213 U/L at 9 hours, even if CPK continues rising, you would need an extremely rapid rate of increase to reach concerning thresholds 4
  • The mean injury severity score in trauma patients who develop AKI is typically 19.5 or higher, with ISS ≥25 being an independent risk factor 4

Monitoring Strategy

Despite the low current risk, serial monitoring is warranted:

  • Repeat CPK measurement at 24 hours post-injury is essential, as this represents a more reliable timepoint for peak levels 1
  • Monitor serum creatinine, electrolytes (particularly potassium), and urine output 1
  • Maintain adequate hydration, as young age and adequate fluid intake are protective factors against AKI even with elevated CPK 5

Important Caveats

Several factors can influence interpretation:

  • Individual variability exists, with some "high responders" reaching remarkably high CPK levels more quickly than others 1
  • Confounding factors including ethnicity, body composition, and exercise intensity lead to highly variable kinetics 1
  • Impact trauma from a fall can drastically increase CK levels without reflecting true muscle breakdown, and CK elevation from simple contusion may not carry the same AKI risk as true rhabdomyolysis 1

Protective Factors Present

Your case has several favorable characteristics:

  • CPK of 213 U/L is far below the 1,000 U/L diagnostic threshold for rhabdomyolysis 2
  • Young age, absence of concurrent cocaine use, and adequate oral fluid hydration are protective against AKI in rhabdomyolysis 5
  • Preserved kidney function is possible even with extremely high CK activity if protective factors are present 5

References

Guideline

Rhabdomyolysis Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Serum Myoglobin Levels and Rhabdomyolysis Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.