What is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer incidence and diagnosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Incidence

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a substantial decline in cancer diagnoses during 2020, with screening-detected cancers dropping by 75-85% at the pandemic's peak, but incidence rates largely returned to near pre-pandemic levels by 2021 without a compensatory rebound to capture the missed 2020 diagnoses—except for metastatic breast cancer, which showed significantly elevated rates, suggesting delayed diagnoses progressed to more advanced stages. 1

Magnitude of Cancer Diagnosis Decline

The pandemic created an unprecedented disruption in cancer detection:

  • Peak screening reductions in April 2020: Breast cancer screening dropped 85%, colorectal cancer 75%, prostate cancer 74%, and lung cancer 56% compared to 2019 baseline 2
  • Overall cancer case decline: A cumulative 7.3% year-over-year reduction in total cancer diagnoses following pandemic onset 3
  • Screen-detected cancers most affected: Nonmelanoma skin cancer declined 20.2%, breast cancer 14.3%, and prostate cancer 12.8% 3

Timeline of Recovery Pattern

The recovery followed a distinct three-phase pattern:

  • Acute decline phase (4 weeks): Precipitous drop of 110 cases per week starting March 4,2020 3
  • Moderate recovery phase (10 weeks): Partial rebound of 23.7 cases per week 3
  • Gradual normalization: Cancer diagnoses trended slowly back toward pre-pandemic baseline over approximately 12 months 3

Critical Finding: Incomplete Recovery

By 2021, cancer incidence rates returned close to expected pre-pandemic trends but did NOT show a rebound that incorporated the delayed diagnoses from 2020 1. This represents a critical gap—the "missing" cancers from 2020 were not subsequently diagnosed in 2021 at higher-than-expected rates.

Exception: Metastatic Breast Cancer

Metastatic breast cancer showed significantly higher observed rates than expected in 2021 (rate ratio = 1.09,95% CI = 1.04-1.13) 1. This suggests that diagnostic delays allowed earlier-stage cancers to progress to metastatic disease, directly impacting mortality and quality of life.

Clinical Service Disruptions

Beyond screening, the entire cancer care continuum was affected:

  • Outpatient visits: Hospital outpatient evaluation and management visits declined 74% in April 2020 2
  • New patient encounters: New patient visits dropped 70% 2
  • Cancer treatment: Physician-administered oncology products decreased 26% in April and 31% in July 2020 2
  • Surgical procedures: Mastectomies reduced consistently April-July, colectomies in April-May, prostatectomies in April and July 2

Long-Term Implications for Mortality and Morbidity

Diagnostic delays longer than 3 months potentially compromise cancer-specific outcomes 4. The Italian College of Breast Radiologists emphasized that while short delays of 6-12 weeks should not affect overall outcomes, delays exceeding 3 months carry risk 4.

The failure to see a compensatory rebound in 2021 diagnoses means:

  • Cancers remain undiagnosed in the population
  • Stage migration toward more advanced disease at diagnosis (as evidenced by metastatic breast cancer increases)
  • Increased future cancer mortality and decreased quality of life

Populations Most Affected

Variations in case volume reductions occurred across:

  • Geographic regions
  • Age groups
  • Gender
  • Race
  • Insurance coverage status 3

Among cancer patients tested for COVID-19,5.3% had positive results 3, highlighting the dual burden faced by this vulnerable population.

Current State and Ongoing Monitoring Needs

Ongoing monitoring and targeted interventions are needed to address the long-term consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care and outcomes 1. The pandemic created an opportunity to reassess early detection programs with explicit prioritization of populations historically experiencing cancer disparities 5.

Priority Populations for Screening Recovery

Target guideline-eligible people who have never been screened or are significantly out of date with screening to maximize benefits 5. This approach focuses resources on populations with the most to gain from screening interventions.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Assuming natural recovery: Do not assume missed diagnoses will automatically present later—the 2021 data shows they did not 1
  • Ignoring stage migration: The metastatic breast cancer increase demonstrates real harm from delays 1
  • Uniform approach: Screen-detected cancers (breast, colorectal, prostate) were disproportionately affected compared to symptom-detected cancers 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.