Diagnostic Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)
The diagnosis of DIC requires an underlying causative condition plus a score of ≥5 points on the ISTH overt DIC scoring system, which incorporates platelet count, fibrin-related markers (D-dimer/FDP), prothrombin time, and fibrinogen level. 1, 2
Essential Prerequisite: Identify the Underlying Trigger
DIC is never a primary disease but always secondary to an underlying condition. 3 The most common triggers include:
- Sepsis (most common cause) 3
- Malignancy (particularly acute promyelocytic leukemia, pancreatic cancer, and adenocarcinomas) 2, 3
- Trauma and major surgery 3
- Obstetric complications 3, 4
Without an underlying causative condition, DIC cannot be diagnosed regardless of laboratory abnormalities. 3
ISTH Overt DIC Scoring System (≥5 Points = DIC)
This is the validated diagnostic standard recommended by international guidelines. 1, 2
Platelet Count:
Fibrin-Related Markers (D-dimer or FDP):
Prothrombin Time (PT):
- 2 points: ≥6 seconds prolongation OR PT ratio >1.4 1, 2
- 1 point: ≥3 to <6 seconds prolongation OR PT ratio >1.2 to ≤1.4 1, 2
Fibrinogen:
Total score ≥5 points confirms overt DIC. 1, 2
Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC) Scoring System (≥4 Points = SIC)
For septic patients specifically, the SIC criteria enable earlier detection before progression to overt DIC. 1, 2 This is clinically important because patients with advanced overt DIC may have illness progression no longer amenable to anticoagulant therapy. 1
Platelet Count:
PT Ratio:
SOFA Score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment):
Total score ≥4 points confirms sepsis-induced coagulopathy. 1, 2
Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid
Normal Coagulation Screens Do NOT Rule Out DIC:
- PT and aPTT may remain normal in approximately 50% of septic DIC cases and in cancer-associated DIC. 5, 3
- A 30% or greater drop in platelet count is diagnostic of subclinical DIC even when absolute platelet values remain in the normal range. 5, 3
Trend Monitoring is More Important Than Static Values:
- Declining trends in platelet count, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors are more diagnostically important than single measurements. 5
- Repeat laboratory testing is essential to assess the dynamically changing scenario. 2, 6
D-dimer Has the Highest Sensitivity:
- A normal D-dimer level effectively rules out DIC (sensitivity 91-100%), making it the single most useful screening test to exclude the diagnosis. 5
Confirmatory Tests for Difficult Cases
When the diagnosis is uncertain despite scoring systems:
- Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor: Low or declining levels confirm consumptive coagulopathy in DIC, whereas these are normal or elevated in chronic liver disease. 5, 3
- Antithrombin levels: Low or declining levels support DIC diagnosis. 5
Monitoring Frequency Based on Clinical Stability
The frequency of repeat testing depends on patient stability: 3
- Daily monitoring: Acute DIC, active bleeding, or rapid deterioration 3
- More frequent monitoring: When initiating treatment 3
- Monthly monitoring: Stable patients with chronic conditions 3
Screening for overt DIC on ICU admission and repeating 2 days later is associated with lower mortality, suggesting that DIC screening itself may lead to improved outcomes. 1
Alternative Diagnostic Criteria
While the ISTH overt DIC criteria are the international standard, other scoring systems exist:
- Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) criteria: Display high sensitivity for DIC 7
- Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) criteria: Still used in Japan 7
All three diagnostic criteria (ISTH, JAAM, JMHW) correlate with poor patient outcomes, with odds ratios for death ranging from 1.88 to 2.55. 7 The ISTH overt-DIC criteria display the highest specificity for DIC. 7