What are the criteria for diagnosing Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

The diagnosis of DIC requires an underlying causative condition plus a score of ≥5 points on the ISTH overt DIC scoring system, which incorporates platelet count, fibrin-related markers (D-dimer/FDP), prothrombin time, and fibrinogen level. 1, 2

Essential Prerequisite: Identify the Underlying Trigger

DIC is never a primary disease but always secondary to an underlying condition. 3 The most common triggers include:

  • Sepsis (most common cause) 3
  • Malignancy (particularly acute promyelocytic leukemia, pancreatic cancer, and adenocarcinomas) 2, 3
  • Trauma and major surgery 3
  • Obstetric complications 3, 4

Without an underlying causative condition, DIC cannot be diagnosed regardless of laboratory abnormalities. 3

ISTH Overt DIC Scoring System (≥5 Points = DIC)

This is the validated diagnostic standard recommended by international guidelines. 1, 2

Platelet Count:

  • 2 points: <50 × 10⁹/L 1, 2
  • 1 point: ≥50 to <100 × 10⁹/L 1, 2

Fibrin-Related Markers (D-dimer or FDP):

  • 3 points: Strong increase 1, 2
  • 2 points: Moderate increase 1, 2

Prothrombin Time (PT):

  • 2 points: ≥6 seconds prolongation OR PT ratio >1.4 1, 2
  • 1 point: ≥3 to <6 seconds prolongation OR PT ratio >1.2 to ≤1.4 1, 2

Fibrinogen:

  • 1 point: <100 mg/dL (or <1.0 g/L) 1, 2

Total score ≥5 points confirms overt DIC. 1, 2

Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC) Scoring System (≥4 Points = SIC)

For septic patients specifically, the SIC criteria enable earlier detection before progression to overt DIC. 1, 2 This is clinically important because patients with advanced overt DIC may have illness progression no longer amenable to anticoagulant therapy. 1

Platelet Count:

  • 2 points: <100 × 10⁹/L 2
  • 1 point: ≥100 to <150 × 10⁹/L 2

PT Ratio:

  • 2 points: >1.4 2
  • 1 point: >1.2 to ≤1.4 2

SOFA Score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment):

  • 2 points: ≥2 1, 2
  • 1 point: 1 2

Total score ≥4 points confirms sepsis-induced coagulopathy. 1, 2

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls to Avoid

Normal Coagulation Screens Do NOT Rule Out DIC:

  • PT and aPTT may remain normal in approximately 50% of septic DIC cases and in cancer-associated DIC. 5, 3
  • A 30% or greater drop in platelet count is diagnostic of subclinical DIC even when absolute platelet values remain in the normal range. 5, 3

Trend Monitoring is More Important Than Static Values:

  • Declining trends in platelet count, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors are more diagnostically important than single measurements. 5
  • Repeat laboratory testing is essential to assess the dynamically changing scenario. 2, 6

D-dimer Has the Highest Sensitivity:

  • A normal D-dimer level effectively rules out DIC (sensitivity 91-100%), making it the single most useful screening test to exclude the diagnosis. 5

Confirmatory Tests for Difficult Cases

When the diagnosis is uncertain despite scoring systems:

  • Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor: Low or declining levels confirm consumptive coagulopathy in DIC, whereas these are normal or elevated in chronic liver disease. 5, 3
  • Antithrombin levels: Low or declining levels support DIC diagnosis. 5

Monitoring Frequency Based on Clinical Stability

The frequency of repeat testing depends on patient stability: 3

  • Daily monitoring: Acute DIC, active bleeding, or rapid deterioration 3
  • More frequent monitoring: When initiating treatment 3
  • Monthly monitoring: Stable patients with chronic conditions 3

Screening for overt DIC on ICU admission and repeating 2 days later is associated with lower mortality, suggesting that DIC screening itself may lead to improved outcomes. 1

Alternative Diagnostic Criteria

While the ISTH overt DIC criteria are the international standard, other scoring systems exist:

  • Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) criteria: Display high sensitivity for DIC 7
  • Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) criteria: Still used in Japan 7

All three diagnostic criteria (ISTH, JAAM, JMHW) correlate with poor patient outcomes, with odds ratios for death ranging from 1.88 to 2.55. 7 The ISTH overt-DIC criteria display the highest specificity for DIC. 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Ruling Out Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.