Treatment of Sarocladium kiliense Pulmonary Infection
For Sarocladium kiliense isolated from lung fungal culture, voriconazole is the recommended first-line antifungal therapy, with amphotericin B and posaconazole as alternative options, and surgical resection should be strongly considered for localized progressive lesions. 1
Primary Antifungal Therapy
Voriconazole is the preferred agent based on ESCMID/ECMM joint guidelines that specifically address Sarocladium kiliense (formerly Acremonium kiliense) infections 1. This recommendation is supported by:
- Clinical case evidence demonstrating voriconazole efficacy: A documented case of S. kiliense fungemia with proven lung involvement in a stem cell transplant patient showed complete resolution after 10 days of voriconazole therapy, with the patient remaining symptom-free at one year 2
- In vitro susceptibility data: While S. kiliense shows high MICs to amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole, it demonstrates sensitivity to voriconazole 2, 3
Dosing for Voriconazole
- Loading dose: 400 mg (6 mg/kg) IV every 12 hours for two doses on day 1 1
- Maintenance dose: 200 mg (4 mg/kg) every 12 hours, with therapeutic drug monitoring recommended 1
Alternative Antifungal Options
When voriconazole cannot be used due to intolerance, drug interactions, or treatment failure:
- Amphotericin B formulations (preferably liposomal amphotericin B 3-5 mg/kg IV daily) are recommended as second-line therapy 1
- Posaconazole is an additional alternative azole option 1
Surgical Intervention
Surgical resection is critical for optimal outcomes and should be considered in the following scenarios 1:
- Hemoptysis from a single cavitary lung lesion (always perform CT chest to exclude additional lesions) 1
- Progressive cavitary lung lesions despite antifungal therapy 1
- Infiltration into pericardium, great vessels, bone, or thoracic soft tissue 1
- Before initiating immunosuppressive therapy to prevent dissemination 1
Treatment Duration and Monitoring
- Minimum treatment duration: 6-12 weeks, varying by extent of disease, clinical improvement, and degree of immunosuppression 1
- Therapeutic drug monitoring for voriconazole is strongly recommended to ensure adequate levels and minimize toxicity 1
- Serial imaging with CT chest to assess treatment response 1
Special Considerations for Immunocompromised Patients
For patients with underlying immunosuppression:
- Reduction of immunosuppression should be attempted if feasible without risking graft rejection or graft-versus-host disease 1
- Secondary prophylaxis with azole therapy should be continued if subsequent immunosuppression is required 1
- Recovery of immune function is a major determinant of successful outcome 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay antifungal therapy while awaiting susceptibility testing; initiate voriconazole empirically once Sarocladium is identified 1
- Do not use fluconazole or standard itraconazole as these agents show poor activity against Sarocladium species 2, 3
- Do not overlook surgical evaluation for localized pulmonary lesions, as medical therapy alone often fails without source control 1
- Ensure proper identification to species level and save the isolate for antifungal susceptibility testing, as Sarocladium species can be misidentified as other hyalohyphomycetes 1
Treatment Failure Management
If the patient fails to respond to initial voriconazole therapy 1:
- Review antifungal susceptibility testing results 1
- Check for drug interactions that may reduce voriconazole levels 1
- Perform therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure adequate voriconazole concentrations 1
- Consider switching to amphotericin B or combination therapy 1
- Re-evaluate for surgical debridement of infected tissue 1