What are the outcomes of thrombectomy (thrombus removal) in patients 6-24 hours after stroke onset?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Thrombectomy Outcomes 6-24 Hours After Stroke Onset

Thrombectomy performed 6-24 hours after stroke onset produces excellent functional outcomes when patients are selected using perfusion imaging to demonstrate salvageable tissue, with approximately 43-53% achieving functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days.

Anterior Circulation Strokes

Patient Selection Requirements

  • Perfusion imaging is mandatory in the 6-24 hour window to demonstrate salvageable tissue using either CT perfusion or diffusion-weighted MRI with perfusion imaging 1
  • The landmark DAWN trial showed patients treated at a median of 12.5 hours achieved a 35.5% increase in functional independence—the largest effect ever described in acute stroke treatment 2
  • DEFUSE 3 demonstrated patients treated at a median of 11 hours had a 28% increase in functional independence and 20% absolute reduction in death or severe disability 2

Functional Outcomes

  • Good outcomes (mRS 0-2) occur in 42-53% of patients selected with perfusion imaging in the 6-24 hour window 3
  • Excellent outcomes (mRS 0-1) occur in 26-32% of patients 3
  • These outcomes are comparable to those achieved in the 0-6 hour window when proper imaging selection is used 3

Safety Profile

  • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates remain low at 4.6-6.5%, similar to early window treatment 3
  • Mortality rates are 3.2-5.7% in properly selected patients 3
  • The technical goal should be modified TICI 2b/3 reperfusion to maximize functional outcomes 1

Posterior Circulation (Basilar Artery Occlusion)

Evidence-Based Time Windows

  • Thrombectomy is indicated (Class I, Level B-R) for basilar artery occlusion from 0-12 hours based on the ATTENTION trial 4
  • Thrombectomy is reasonable (Class IIa, Level B-R) from 12-24 hours based on the BAOCHE trial 4
  • The BAOCHE trial specifically enrolled patients 6-24 hours after onset and demonstrated 46% achieved favorable outcomes (mRS 0-3) versus 24% with medical therapy alone 4

Basilar Artery Outcomes

  • ATTENTION trial showed 46% achieved good functional outcome (mRS 0-3) versus 23% with medical therapy (absolute risk reduction 2.06) 4
  • Mortality at 90 days was significantly lower with thrombectomy: 31-37% versus 42-55% with medical therapy 4
  • Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage remained low at 5-6%, not significantly different from medical therapy 4

Critical Factors Affecting Late Window Outcomes

Infarct Growth Velocity

  • Late-presenting patients have slower infarct growth velocity (median 0.6 mL/h) compared to early presenters (5.1 mL/h) 3
  • Patients with infarct core growth rate <4.1 mL/hr and initial core volumes <19.9 mL have >89% accuracy for maintaining core <50 mL at 24 hours, predicting favorable thrombectomy outcomes 5
  • Up to half of all large vessel occlusion patients have this favorable slow-growth physiology 5

Imaging Characteristics

  • Late-presenting patients typically have smaller hypoperfusion volumes (median 77 mL versus 133 mL in early presenters) 3
  • Patients must have PC-ASPECTS ≥6 for posterior circulation strokes 4
  • The concept of "tissue window" rather than "time window" is the paradigm shift that enables extended treatment 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Critical Errors

  • Never attempt thrombectomy in the 6-24 hour window without perfusion imaging—tissue selection is mandatory for benefit 1
  • Do not delay thrombectomy for unnecessary testing; only blood glucose measurement is required before treatment 1
  • Do not wait to assess IV thrombolysis response before proceeding to angiography if thrombectomy is being considered 1

Technical Considerations

  • Fewer thrombectomy attempts are associated with better outcomes in late window patients 6
  • Successful recanalization (TICI 2b-3) rates of 81-84% are achievable in the extended window 7

Beyond 24 Hours

Limited Evidence

  • Thrombectomy beyond 24 hours may be reasonable on a case-by-case basis (Class IIb, Level C-EO) for basilar artery occlusion 4
  • For anterior circulation, patients treated beyond 24 hours who otherwise meet DAWN criteria show comparable safety (5% symptomatic hemorrhage) and functional independence (43%) to those treated within 24 hours 7
  • However, outcomes are generally worse beyond 24 hours (18.8% functional independence) compared to 6-24 hour window (34.9%), with higher mortality (OR 2.34) 6
  • Functional outcomes beyond 24 hours remain poor when recanalization is achieved >9 hours after onset in patients with low NIHSS scores (≤6) 4

References

Guideline

Thrombectomy Outcomes in the 6-24 Hour Window

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2020

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion strokes beyond 24 hours.

Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023

Research

Thrombectomy 24 hours after stroke: beyond DAWN.

Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.