What about using plazomicin for multi-drug resistant Klebsiella infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Plazomicin for Multi-Drug Resistant Klebsiella Infections

Plazomicin is recommended primarily for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella at 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours, but should be reserved as an alternative option when newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are unavailable or inactive. 1, 2, 3

Primary Role: Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

  • Plazomicin is FDA-approved specifically for cUTI caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including Klebsiella pneumoniae, at a dose of 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours for 5-7 days. 1, 2, 3

  • In the phase III trial, plazomicin demonstrated noninferiority to meropenem with composite cure rates of 81.7% versus 70.1% at test-of-cure visit for cUTI. 3, 4

  • For simple cystitis due to CRE, single-dose aminoglycosides (including plazomicin) may be considered as an alternative regimen. 1

Positioning in Treatment Algorithm

For KPC-producing Klebsiella infections, newer β-lactam agents (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam) should be first-line, with plazomicin reserved as an alternative. 1

  • The 2022 Italian guidelines provide strong recommendations (moderate certainty) for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam as first-line agents for KPC-producing CRE infections, demonstrating 28-day mortality of 18.3% versus 40.8% for alternative therapies. 1

  • Plazomicin is listed alongside other alternatives (imipenem/relebactam, eravacycline) for which insufficient comparative evidence exists. 1

Antimicrobial Activity Profile

Plazomicin demonstrates excellent activity against KPC and OXA-48 producing Klebsiella but has variable activity against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers. 2, 3

  • The drug is stable against most aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) that compromise traditional aminoglycosides like gentamicin and amikacin. 3, 4

  • Critical limitation: Plazomicin is inactive against bacteria producing 16S rRNA methyltransferases, which often co-exist with MBL-producing strains. 3

  • In vitro studies show MIC ranges of 0.12-8 μg/mL against Klebsiella species, with the highest activity demonstrated in recent Greek hospital data (MIC50/MIC90: 0.5/1.5 μg/mL). 5, 6

Use in Bloodstream Infections

For Klebsiella bacteremia, plazomicin-based combination therapy may be considered when first-line agents are unavailable, though evidence is limited. 2, 7

  • In the CARE trial, plazomicin-based combinations showed numerically lower mortality compared to colistin-based regimens (24% versus 50%), though this was a small study. 2

  • A case report documented successful treatment of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella bacteremia using plazomicin combined with meropenem/vaborbactam in a patient with renal failure. 7

  • Important caveat: The ESCMID guidelines note insufficient evidence comparing plazomicin monotherapy versus combination therapy for serious CRE infections. 1, 2

Combination Therapy Considerations

Plazomicin demonstrates synergy with β-lactams (piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, meropenem) against MDR Klebsiella without antagonism. 3, 5

  • Checkerboard and time-kill assays confirm synergistic activity when combined with β-lactams against aminoglycoside-resistant and carbapenemase-producing strains. 5

  • No antagonism was observed when combined with colistin, tigecycline, fosfomycin, or other agents. 3

Safety Profile and Monitoring

Plazomicin carries the aminoglycoside class Black Box Warning for nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neuromuscular blockade, but demonstrated favorable safety in clinical trials. 3, 4, 8

  • Most common adverse effects include decreased renal function (3.7%), diarrhea (2.3%), hypertension (2.3%), and headache (1.3%). 4, 8

  • Critical monitoring requirement: Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential in patients with renal dysfunction, as drug levels can remain persistently elevated. 7

  • Dosage reductions are required for moderate-to-severe renal impairment, and the drug is not recommended in patients requiring renal replacement therapy per FDA labeling. 3, 4

  • However, successful use with therapeutic drug monitoring has been documented in a patient requiring hemodialysis, suggesting careful monitoring may allow use in this population. 7

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Identify carbapenemase type through rapid molecular testing (KPC, OXA-48, MBL). 1

  2. For KPC or OXA-48 producers:

    • First-line: Ceftazidime/avibactam or meropenem/vaborbactam 1
    • Alternative for cUTI: Plazomicin 15 mg/kg IV q12h 1, 2
  3. For MBL producers:

    • Avoid plazomicin if 16S rRNA methyltransferase co-exists 3
    • Consider ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam combination instead 1
  4. For serious infections (bacteremia, pneumonia):

    • Prioritize newer β-lactam combinations over plazomicin 1
    • Consider plazomicin-based combination therapy only when alternatives unavailable 2, 7

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use plazomicin for pneumonia: Insufficient evidence exists for this indication, and newer β-lactams have superior data. 1

  • Do not assume activity against all CRE: Test for 16S rRNA methyltransferases and MBL production, which confer resistance. 3

  • Do not use standard dosing in renal impairment without adjustment and monitoring: Persistently elevated levels increase toxicity risk. 3, 7, 4

  • Do not use as monotherapy for serious infections when combination therapy is feasible: Limited evidence supports monotherapy outside of cUTI. 1, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.