What is the treatment for an esophageal foreign body, specifically a fish fork, lodged in the esophagus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Fish Fork Lodged in Esophagus

A fish fork lodged in the esophagus requires emergent flexible endoscopy within 2-6 hours for removal, as sharp foreign bodies carry high risk of perforation, mediastinitis, and mortality up to 22%. 1, 2, 3

Immediate Management Algorithm

Initial Assessment and Imaging

  • Obtain baseline labs including complete blood count, C-reactive protein, blood gas analysis, and lactate to assess for systemic complications 1

  • Perform CT scan of chest and neck if perforation is suspected or if the clinical presentation suggests complications, as CT has 90-100% sensitivity compared to only 32% for plain X-rays 1

  • Avoid contrast swallow studies as they increase aspiration risk and impair subsequent endoscopic visualization 1

  • Look specifically for pneumomediastinum, mediastinal air, subcutaneous emphysema, or paraesophageal fluid collections on imaging, which indicate perforation 2, 3, 4

Endoscopic Removal Strategy

Emergent flexible endoscopy (within 2-6 hours) is the first-line treatment for sharp foreign bodies like a fish fork, as delays increase perforation risk and complications 1, 3, 5

  • Use low-flow CO2 insufflation rather than air to minimize mediastinal contamination if perforation occurs 6

  • Remove the fork using appropriate grasping instruments (rat-tooth forceps, snares, or baskets) with careful technique to avoid causing additional mucosal injury 2, 5

  • Carefully inspect the esophageal wall after removal for evidence of perforation, as sharp objects frequently cause mucosal injury 2, 3

  • If rigid endoscopy is needed (if flexible endoscopy fails), consider this as second-line approach, particularly for upper esophageal foreign bodies 1

Management Based on Perforation Status

If No Perforation Detected

  • Keep patient NPO initially and advance diet cautiously after confirming no delayed perforation 1

  • Obtain diagnostic biopsies during the index endoscopy to evaluate for underlying esophageal pathology (stricture, eosinophilic esophagitis, malignancy) 1

  • Arrange outpatient follow-up to confirm healing and address any underlying esophageal disorder 1

If Perforation is Identified

The management pathway depends on perforation characteristics and patient stability:

For Contained Perforation Without Instability

  • Consider endoscopic band ligation as an immediate endoscopic closure technique for acute perforations, which has been successfully reported 2

  • Initiate non-operative management if patient meets criteria: hemodynamically stable, no free extravasation of contrast, no systemic sepsis 6

  • Non-operative management requires:

    • ICU-level monitoring with surgical expertise available 24/7 6
    • NPO status with broad-spectrum antibiotics 6
    • Nasogastric tube placement for esophageal decompression 6
    • Early nutritional support via enteral feeding or TPN 6
    • Percutaneous drainage of any peri-esophageal collections 6

For Free Perforation or Unstable Patient

Immediate surgical intervention is mandatory if the patient has hemodynamic instability, obvious non-contained contrast extravasation, or systemic signs of severe sepsis 6

  • For cervical esophageal perforation: Direct repair should be attempted whenever feasible; if not feasible, perform esophagostomy with cervical drainage 6, 7

  • For thoracic esophageal perforation: Operative repair is the treatment of choice; if primary repair not feasible, perform diversion, exclusion, or resection 6

  • Buttress repairs with vascularized tissue (muscle flap) to decrease leakage risk 7

  • Surgery must be performed within 24 hours as delayed surgical management (>24 hours) increases morbidity and reduces odds of successful primary repair 6

Critical Complications to Monitor

Sharp foreign bodies like fish forks are particularly prone to causing:

  • Mediastinitis (most life-threatening complication) 2, 3, 4
  • Paraesophageal or retropharyngeal abscess 2, 3
  • Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax 2, 3
  • Tracheoesophageal fistula 3
  • Aortoesophageal fistula (rare but catastrophic) 3

Mortality without appropriate management ranges from 3.92-50%, making timely intervention critical 7, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay endoscopy waiting for "spontaneous passage" with sharp objects—they require active removal 3, 5

  • Do not perform blind extraction attempts without endoscopic or surgical visualization 5

  • Do not discharge patients immediately after removal without confirming absence of delayed perforation, as some perforations manifest hours later 2, 4

  • Do not miss underlying esophageal pathology that predisposed to impaction—obtain biopsies during index endoscopy 1

References

Guideline

Management of Esophageal Food Impaction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Successful endoscopic band ligation of esophageal perforation by fish bone ingestion.

Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2013

Research

[Esophageal Foreign Body: Treatment and Complications].

The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2018

Research

[Foreign Body in Esophagus].

Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery, 2015

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Esophageal Perforation Following Traumatic Cervical Spine Injury

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.