How to order an X-ray for the heel

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Order an X-ray for the Heel

Order a standard three-view foot radiograph series consisting of anteroposterior (AP), medial oblique, and lateral projections, with weight-bearing films if the patient can tolerate standing, and add an axial Harris-Beath view specifically for calcaneal evaluation. 1, 2, 3

Standard Ordering Protocol

Essential Views for Heel Imaging

  • Request three standard views: anteroposterior (AP), medial oblique, and lateral projections as your baseline imaging series 1, 3
  • Add the axial Harris-Beath view specifically when evaluating the calcaneus (heel bone), as this view optimally assesses the posterior foot and subtalar joint anatomy that standard views may miss 1, 2
  • Specify weight-bearing films on your requisition if the patient can stand, as these detect dynamic abnormalities like structural changes and alignment issues not visible on non-weight-bearing images 1, 2, 3

Key Ordering Details

  • Write "Foot X-ray, three views plus axial Harris-Beath" on your requisition to ensure adequate coverage of the heel and adjacent structures 3
  • Specify "weight-bearing" or "standing" unless contraindicated by patient mobility, severe pain, or risk of fracture displacement 2, 3
  • Include your clinical indication (e.g., "heel pain," "rule out calcaneal fracture," "plantar fasciitis") to guide the radiologist's interpretation 3

Clinical Context and Rationale

Why Weight-Bearing Matters

  • Weight-bearing radiographs provide functional information about how the heel performs under physiologic load, revealing hardware loosening, joint malalignment, or structural abnormalities that disappear when unloaded 2
  • Non-weight-bearing films are acceptable alternatives only when patients cannot bear weight due to pain or limited mobility, though they provide less clinically useful information 2
  • The combination of thickened plantar fascia and fat pad abnormalities on weight-bearing radiographs has 85% sensitivity and 95% specificity for plantar fasciitis 1

Why the Axial Harris-Beath View Is Critical

  • The axial Harris-Beath view is specifically designed for suspected calcaneal fractures and determines intra-articular extent that standard views cannot adequately visualize 1
  • This view should be added to the standard three views for optimal evaluation of hardware in the calcaneus and assessment of posterior foot anatomy 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don't order only "heel films" or "calcaneus films"—the standard three-view foot series provides better anatomic coverage and context for interpreting heel pathology 3
  • Don't skip weight-bearing views unless absolutely necessary, as relying solely on non-weight-bearing films can miss clinically significant displacement, loosening, or alignment issues 2, 3
  • Don't forget the axial Harris-Beath view when specifically evaluating the calcaneus, as standard views alone may miss important calcaneal fractures or subtalar joint pathology 1, 2
  • Don't rely solely on radiographs if clinical suspicion remains high despite normal films—heel pain conditions like early stress fractures or plantar fasciitis may not show radiographic changes for 10-14 days after symptom onset 3, 4

When Initial Radiographs Are Insufficient

  • Consider bilateral comparison films when evaluating subtle alignment or structural changes, particularly helpful in complex midfoot-hindfoot relationships 2, 3
  • If radiographs are normal but clinical suspicion remains high, MRI should be ordered next for soft tissue evaluation (plantar fascia, Achilles tendon pathology) 1, 3
  • CT should be considered for complex fracture patterns, assessing bone quality, or when plain radiographs are equivocal regarding fracture extent 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Radiographic Evaluation of Foot Hardware

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Imaging Guidelines for Osteomyelitis Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.