Treatment of Carcinomatosis
The optimal treatment approach for carcinomatosis depends critically on the primary tumor type, extent of disease, and patient functional status, with cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) offering potential cure in highly selected patients, while most require palliative systemic chemotherapy or best supportive care. 1
Initial Diagnostic Evaluation
The first step requires identifying the primary tumor source through comprehensive histopathological evaluation with immunohistochemistry, as treatment algorithms differ dramatically based on tumor origin 1:
- Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis should undergo immunostaining for estrogen and progesterone receptors plus mammography to exclude breast cancer 1
- Women with serous adenocarcinoma should be treated identically to FIGO stage III ovarian cancer 2, 1
- Men require PSA, alpha-fetoprotein, and beta-HCG measurement to exclude prostate cancer and extragonadal germ cell tumors 2, 1
- All patients need CT chest/abdomen/pelvis to assess disease extent 2, 1
Treatment Algorithm Based on Disease Characteristics
For Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Gastric or Colorectal Cancer
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus HIPEC should be offered to carefully selected patients with limited peritoneal disease (peritoneal cancer index <6-20), no extraperitoneal metastases, good functional status, and feasibility of complete macroscopic cytoreduction 2, 1. This approach achieves 5-year survival rates of 30-50% in appropriately selected patients 3, 4.
Critical selection criteria include:
- Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) <6 for gastric cancer 2
- PCI <20 for colorectal cancer 3
- Absence of disseminated small bowel disease 3
- No distant organ metastases 1, 3
- Ability to achieve complete macroscopic cytoreduction (R0/R1 resection) 4
Important caveat: The REGATTA trial demonstrated that gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy provided no survival benefit over chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric cancer with metastatic disease, so reduction surgery outside the CRS+HIPEC protocol is not recommended 2.
For Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Unknown Primary
Women with serous histology adenocarcinoma should undergo optimal cytoreductive surgery (debulking) followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, treating as FIGO III ovarian cancer 2, 1. This represents the single most important treatment decision, as this subset has significantly better outcomes than other carcinomatosis patients.
For poorly differentiated carcinoma with predominantly nodal disease, platinum-based combination chemotherapy should be initiated 2, 1.
HIPEC is not recommended for carcinomatosis of unknown primary due to lack of specific supporting data 1.
For Patients Ineligible for Cytoreductive Surgery
Palliative systemic chemotherapy remains the standard approach for most patients with carcinomatosis 2:
- Colorectal origin: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab improves median survival from 7.5 to 11 months (HR 0.7) compared to chemotherapy alone, and should be added unless contraindicated 5
- Multiple metastases (liver, bone, multiple sites): Low-toxicity palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care are acceptable options 2
- Response evaluation should occur after 2-3 chemotherapy cycles 2, 1
Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction
When carcinomatosis causes bowel obstruction, treatment strategy depends on prognosis 2:
For patients with months-to-weeks prognosis:
- Consider medical management rather than surgical intervention 2
- Assess treatment goals (decrease nausea/vomiting, allow eating, decrease pain, enable home/hospice discharge) 2
Pharmacologic management when gut function cannot be maintained:
- Octreotide 100-300 mcg subcutaneous BID-TID or 10-40 mcg/hr continuous infusion (consider long-acting formulation if prognosis >8 weeks) 2
- Anticholinergics (scopolamine, hyoscyamine, glycopyrrolate) 2
- Corticosteroids: Dexamethasone 4-12 mg IV daily, discontinue if no improvement in 3-5 days 2
- Avoid prokinetic agents like metoclopramide in complete obstruction (may be beneficial in partial obstruction) 2
Surgical or endoscopic interventions:
- Operative management, endoscopic stenting, or percutaneous gastrostomy for drainage may be considered if improved quality of life is the primary goal 2
- Risks (mortality, morbidity, reobstruction) must be thoroughly discussed 2
Nasogastric tube drainage should be considered only if other measures fail, as it increases aspiration risk and patient discomfort 2.
Palliative and Supportive Care
All patients with advanced carcinomatosis should receive or be referred for palliative care to optimize symptom management and maximize quality of life 2. This is not optional—it should be integrated early in the disease course, not reserved for end-of-life care.
Key palliative interventions include:
- Aggressive symptom control (pain, nausea, constipation) using appropriate routes (rectal, transdermal, subcutaneous, intravenous) 2
- Consideration of IV/subcutaneous fluids if evidence of dehydration and consistent with goals of care 2
- Total parenteral nutrition only if expected improvement in quality of life and life expectancy of months to years 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Failing to identify women with serous adenocarcinoma who should be treated as ovarian cancer—this subset has dramatically better outcomes with appropriate treatment 2, 1
Offering cytoreductive surgery to patients with high PCI or extraperitoneal disease—these patients derive no benefit and experience only surgical morbidity 2, 3
Using prokinetic agents in complete bowel obstruction—these worsen symptoms and should be avoided 2
Delaying palliative care referral—early integration improves quality of life and should occur regardless of whether curative-intent treatment is pursued 2
Pursuing aggressive surgical debulking outside specialized centers—CRS+HIPEC requires expertise and patient selection; outcomes are poor when performed without appropriate infrastructure 3, 4