What are the risks associated with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk Profile of HIPEC

HIPEC carries moderate to substantial procedural risks with major complications occurring in 9-40% of patients and mortality rates of 0-7%, but recent high-quality trials demonstrate that when performed at experienced centers with appropriate patient selection, it does not significantly increase morbidity or mortality compared to cytoreductive surgery alone. 1

Mortality Risk

  • Perioperative mortality (≤30 days) ranges from 0% to 7% across trials, though the most recent and highest-quality studies consistently report 0% procedure-related deaths. 1
  • In gastric cancer specifically, the CYTO-CHIP study (277 patients) showed HIPEC added to cytoreductive surgery improved survival without increasing mortality. 1
  • A phase II gastric cancer trial reported 90-day mortality of 0% despite 70% morbidity rate. 1
  • In gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis, serious adverse events occurred in 14.7% of HIPEC patients versus 11.7% in surgery-alone patients (not statistically significant, P=0.839). 1

Major Complication Rates

  • Major/severe complications occur in 9-40% of patients within 30 days of surgery, with significant variation across trials and centers. 1
  • Complication rates have decreased over time at experienced centers as techniques have evolved and institutional experience has grown. 1
  • The M06OVH-OVHIPEC trial (largest ovarian cancer study, n=245) showed no difference in grade 3-4 toxicities between HIPEC and control groups (27% vs 25%). 1

Specific Complications by System

Infectious complications include:

  • Wound infections, sepsis, pneumonia, central line-associated infections, and intra-abdominal infections 1
  • Abscesses and fistulas (various types) 1

Gastrointestinal complications include:

  • Surgical wound dehiscence 1
  • Bowel perforation 1
  • Ileus 1
  • Intestinal anastomotic leakage (no significant difference versus control in meta-analysis) 2

Cardiovascular and pulmonary complications include:

  • Venous thromboembolism 1
  • Myocardial infarction 1
  • Pleural effusions and pneumothorax 1

Other major complications include:

  • Hemorrhages requiring intervention 1
  • Renal failure/insufficiency 1
  • Excessive blood loss (common, with >50% requiring transfusions in some studies) 1

Procedural Burden

  • Median procedure time ranges from 300-600 minutes (5-10 hours), significantly longer than cytoreductive surgery alone. 1
  • Median hospital stay ranges from 8-24 days, though the M06OVH-OVHIPEC trial showed minimal difference (10 vs 8 days for HIPEC vs control). 1
  • Many patients require additional procedures to manage complications, emphasizing the need for comprehensive perioperative care. 1

Critical Risk Mitigation Factors

Patient selection is paramount:

  • HIPEC should be reserved for patients with high-volume intraperitoneal disease or peritoneal carcinomatosis who are at risk for widespread microscopic disease after resection. 1
  • Patients with low peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI <7-10) have better outcomes and lower complication rates. 1
  • Complete cytoreduction (R0 resection) is essential for benefit to outweigh risks; incomplete cytoreduction negates survival advantages. 1, 3
  • Patients with distant extra-abdominal metastases should generally be excluded as intraperitoneal therapy will not address systemic disease. 1

Institutional experience matters:

  • High-volume centers demonstrate lower complication rates as experience accumulates. 1
  • Techniques have evolved to reduce complications, with both "open" and "closed" abdominal approaches tested. 1

Context-Specific Risk-Benefit Analysis

For ovarian cancer (interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy):

  • HIPEC improved survival without increasing toxicity or affecting quality of life in the definitive M06OVH-OVHIPEC trial. 1
  • Grade 3-4 toxicities were equivalent (27% vs 25%). 1

For gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases:

  • CYTO-CHIP study showed HIPEC improved survival without increasing morbidity or mortality. 1
  • However, the GASTRIPEC-I trial showed no overall survival benefit (HR 0.72, P=0.1647), though progression-free survival improved. 1
  • A phase II trial reported 70% 90-day morbidity but 0% mortality. 1

For prophylactic HIPEC in advanced gastric cancer without peritoneal carcinomatosis:

  • Meta-analysis shows improved 1-year and 3-year survival with reduced recurrence rates (RR 0.60) without increased complications. 3
  • No statistically significant difference in complication rates (RR 1.15, P=0.51). 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Performing HIPEC in patients unlikely to achieve complete cytoreduction wastes resources and exposes patients to unnecessary risk without survival benefit. 1, 3
  • Using HIPEC in patients with extensive disease (PCI >10) or extra-abdominal metastases where systemic disease will determine prognosis regardless of locoregional control. 1
  • Inadequate institutional experience or volume leads to higher complication rates; this procedure should be performed at specialized centers. 1
  • Failure to provide comprehensive perioperative support given the high rate of complications requiring additional interventions. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.