What are the indications for nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indications for Nuchal Translucency Ultrasound

Nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound is indicated as a first-trimester screening tool for fetal aneuploidy (particularly Down syndrome), genetic syndromes, structural anomalies, and risk of intrauterine demise in pregnancies between 11+0 and 14+0 weeks of gestation. 1, 2

Primary Screening Indication

  • Aneuploidy screening is the principal indication, as NT measurement combined with maternal age detects over 75% of trisomy 21 cases and 81% of all aneuploidies 1, 3
  • The test functions as a powerful independent marker for chromosomal abnormalities including trisomies 21,18, and 13, Turner syndrome, and triploidy 1, 2
  • NT ≥3 mm carries approximately a 33% risk of chromosomal abnormalities, with half being trisomy 21 2

Specific Clinical Scenarios Warranting NT Evaluation

High-Risk Populations

  • Advanced maternal age (≥35 years) or elevated age-related risk 1
  • Prior pregnancy with chromosomal abnormality or family history of genetic disorders 1
  • Positive first-trimester combined screening (NT plus biochemical markers) 1

Follow-up Indications

  • Dichorionic twin pregnancies benefit from NT screening, particularly when one or both fetuses have NT ≥3 mm, which warrants additional Doppler evaluation and fetal echocardiography 1
  • Borderline NT measurements (2.5-2.9 mm) increase aneuploidy risk 2.5-fold compared to NT <2.5 mm, justifying screening in this population 4

Optimal Timing and Technical Requirements

  • Schedule at 12-13 weeks' gestation based on last menstrual period to minimize missed miscarriages (which decrease with advancing gestation) while avoiding crown-rump length >84 mm (which increases with advancing gestation and prevents accurate measurement) 5
  • The measurement window is strictly 11+0 to 14+0 weeks, as NT is crown-rump length dependent and loses predictive value outside this range 1, 2
  • Standardized measurement technique following Fetal Medicine Foundation or Nuchal Translucency Quality Review criteria is essential for accuracy 2, 6

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on NT measurement alone: It detects only 70% of trisomy 21 cases when used as a standalone test and should be combined with maternal age and/or biochemical markers 2
  • Recognize technical limitations: Success rates for obtaining adequate measurements are only 58% overall, improving to 74% at ≥10 weeks' gestation 7
  • Understand the limitations of early anatomic survey: Even when performed at 11-14 weeks in experienced centers, sensitivity for detecting congenital anomalies is only 50% compared to 75% at 18-22 weeks 1, 2

Management When NT is Increased (≥3 mm)

When NT measures ≥3 mm, the following cascade of evaluations is indicated 1, 2:

  • Immediate genetic counseling and offer of invasive diagnostic testing (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling)
  • Cell-free fetal DNA screening as an alternative, though this only detects trisomies 21,18,13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies, missing conditions like Noonan syndrome and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome 1
  • Targeted genetic studies including microarray analysis, as 10% of euploid fetuses with NT ≥3 mm have genetic variants consistent with Noonan syndrome 1
  • Second-trimester anatomic survey at 18-22 weeks regardless of genetic testing results 1
  • Fetal echocardiography due to elevated risk of congenital heart disease even in euploid fetuses 1, 2
  • Serial fetal surveillance throughout pregnancy to monitor growth and well-being, as intrauterine demise risk increases proportionally with NT thickness 1

Transvaginal Approach Considerations

  • Transvaginal ultrasound may be advantageous in patients with increased body mass index, abdominal wall scarring, or fetal positioning in the lower uterus to ensure accurate measurement 1
  • Measurements are equivalent between transabdominal and transvaginal approaches when proper technique is applied, so transvaginal imaging is not required if transabdominal views are satisfactory 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.