What is the recommended initial imaging study for a suspected aortic dissection in the chest?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Imaging for Suspected Aortic Dissection

CT angiography (CTA) of the chest is the first-line imaging modality for suspected aortic dissection in the emergency setting. 1

Why CTA is the Preferred Initial Test

CTA has emerged as the standard of reference for diagnosing aortic dissection due to several critical advantages:

  • Diagnostic accuracy is exceptional, with pooled sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% for detecting aortic dissection 1
  • Speed and availability are unmatched, with 24/7 accessibility in emergency departments and rapid image acquisition that allows for quick diagnosis and treatment 1
  • Comprehensive anatomic detail shows the full extent of dissection, entry tear sites, branch vessel involvement, and complications including malperfusion syndromes, pericardial effusion, hemopericardium, periaortic or mediastinal hematoma, and pleural effusion 1
  • Sensitivity and specificity exceed 99% in multiple studies, making it highly reliable for ruling in or ruling out dissection 2

Optimal CTA Protocol

Order ECG-gated CTA with both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced phases:

  • ECG-gated acquisition reduces motion artifacts of the aortic root and thoracic aorta, improving diagnostic accuracy 1
  • Non-enhanced CT followed by contrast-enhanced angiography is the recommended protocol, particularly important for detecting intramural hematoma which may be missed on contrast-only studies 1
  • Scan the entire aorta from the aortic sinus through the iliac bifurcation, as patients with thoracic aortic pathology have increased incidence of abdominal aortic disease 3

However, a chest-only protocol can be considered initially to reduce radiation exposure, with abdominopelvic imaging added only if clinically indicated, as this approach reduces radiation dose by 14.6% without compromising diagnostic accuracy 4

When to Use Alternative Imaging

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) should be ordered when:

  • The patient has a contraindication to iodinated contrast (severe contrast allergy or renal failure) 1
  • The patient is too hemodynamically unstable to transport to the CT scanner 1
  • Rapid bedside assessment is needed in a critically ill patient 1

MRI/MRA should be considered when:

  • The patient is stable but has a contraindication to iodinated contrast 1
  • Follow-up imaging is needed to reduce cumulative radiation exposure 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not rely on chest X-ray alone to rule out dissection—while abnormal in 60-90% of cases, it lacks the sensitivity and specificity needed for definitive diagnosis 5

Be aware of CT artifacts that can mimic dissection, including:

  • Motion artifacts in the ascending aorta that can create false positives 1
  • Streak artifacts from implanted devices 3
  • Periaortic structures such as aortic arch branches, mediastinal veins, and pericardial recesses that may simulate dissection 6

Do not delay imaging in patients with moderate to high clinical suspicion—mortality increases by 1-2% per hour in untreated aortic dissection 5, 7

Consider ordering a second imaging test if the first is negative and clinical suspicion remains high (probability >15-35% depending on initial test used), as the benefits of a second test outweigh the risks when obtained within 10 hours 7

References

Guideline

Imaging Recommendations for Suspected Aortic Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

[CT angiography of the aorta].

Der Radiologe, 2007

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Initial Management of Aortic Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at CT angiography.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.