How to explain and treat X-ray results showing mild to moderate degenerative changes and anterior fusion of C5-C6 without evidence of acute fracture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Explaining X-ray Results to Patient

Your X-ray shows degenerative changes in your cervical spine (neck arthritis) with a previous fusion at C5-C6 that appears intact, and importantly, there is no fracture or acute injury requiring immediate intervention. 1

Patient-Friendly Explanation

  • Previous Surgery Status: The fusion hardware at C5-C6 from your prior surgery is intact and well-positioned, with no evidence of loosening or failure 1

  • Degenerative Changes: You have mild to moderate "wear and tear" arthritis affecting multiple levels of your neck, which includes:

    • Disc space narrowing (the cushions between vertebrae are thinner)
    • Facet joint enlargement (the small joints in the back of your spine show arthritis)
    • These changes are common and do not necessarily correlate with symptom severity 1
  • No Acute Injury: There is no fracture or bone break, and your spine alignment is normal without any slippage of vertebrae 1

  • Limitations of X-rays: X-rays cannot fully evaluate soft tissues, ligaments, or disc problems—if your symptoms persist or worsen, advanced imaging (CT or MRI) may be needed 1

Treatment Algorithm

Initial Conservative Management (First-Line for All Patients)

Conservative treatment should be attempted first unless severe or progressive neurological deficits are present. 2

  • Activity Modification: Maintain normal activity rather than bed rest, which is more effective for neck pain 2

  • Pharmacologic Management:

    • Neuropathic pain medications (gabapentin, pregabalin) for radicular symptoms, as simple analgesics respond poorly 2
    • NSAIDs for axial neck pain
    • Opioids only with strict restrictions: lowest dose, shortest duration, close monitoring due to lack of long-term benefit and significant harm potential 2
  • Physical Therapy: Structured exercise program focusing on cervical stabilization and range of motion 2

  • Duration: Trial conservative management for 6-12 weeks before escalating 2

Escalation for Persistent Symptoms

  • Image-Guided Epidural Steroid Injections: For persistent radicular symptoms despite initial conservative therapy (fluoroscopy or CT guidance essential—never blind injections) 2

  • Advanced Imaging Indications:

    • Persistent symptoms after 6-12 weeks of conservative management
    • Progressive neurological deficits
    • Severe radicular pain unresponsive to conservative care
    • CT is the most sensitive and specific modality for assessing fusion status and hardware complications 1, 3
    • MRI for evaluating soft tissue pathology, disc herniation, or neural compression 1

Surgical Consideration Criteria

Surgery is indicated ONLY when there is radiographic confirmation of specific pathology correlating with clinical symptoms. 3

Indications for Surgical Intervention:

  1. Adjacent Segment Disease: New symptomatic compression above or below the fusion with:

    • Radiographic stenosis on MRI/CT
    • Correlating radiculopathy or myelopathy
    • Failed conservative management (minimum 6-12 weeks) 1, 2
  2. Hardware Failure: Documented on CT showing loosening, fracture, or migration 1, 3

  3. Pseudarthrosis: Radiographic nonunion with persistent symptoms, though this requires CT confirmation showing motion >4° on flexion-extension or lack of bridging trabeculation 1, 3

  4. Progressive Neurological Deficits: Myelopathy or severe radiculopathy with objective findings 2

Critical Pitfall to Avoid:

Do NOT proceed with surgery based on symptoms alone without radiographic confirmation of pathology—imaging findings must correlate with clinical presentation. 3, 2

Surgical Approach Selection (If Surgery Indicated)

For adjacent segment disease or recurrent compression after prior ACDF, posterior revision (laminoforaminotomy) is superior to anterior revision. 2

  • Posterior Approach Outcomes:

    • Fusion rates: 94-100% 1, 2
    • Clinical improvement: 77-88% 1, 2
    • Hardware failure: 12% 1, 2
    • Reoperation rate: 2% 1, 2
  • Anterior Revision Outcomes (inferior):

    • Fusion rates: 45-76% 1, 2
    • Clinical improvement: 40-59% 1, 2
    • Hardware failure: 45% 1, 2
    • Reoperation rate: 44% 1, 2

Specialist Referral Timeline

  • Within 2 weeks: Severe radicular pain or any neurological deficits 2
  • Within 3 months: Less severe but persistent symptoms despite conservative management 2

Monitoring and Follow-Up

  • Clinical reassessment at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months during conservative management 2
  • Repeat imaging only if symptoms progress or new neurological findings develop 1, 3
  • Long-term surveillance: Adjacent segment disease can develop years after fusion, with reported reoperation rates of 22.2% at 10 years 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Postoperative C5-C7 Changes with Posterior Spurring and Radicular Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Medical Necessity of ACDF C3-7 with Hardware Removal C5-7

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.