Is destruction by neurolytic agent of paravertebral facet joint nerve(s) with imaging guidance (fluoroscopy or Computed Tomography (CT)) for cervical or thoracic, single facet joint medically indicated for a patient with spondylosis, hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, chronic pain syndrome, and familial dysautonomia?

Medical Necessity Determination for Cervical Radiofrequency Ablation

This procedure is NOT medically indicated based on the submitted diagnoses and documentation.

The primary issue is a critical mismatch between the requested procedure codes (64633/64634 for cervical/thoracic facet denervation) and the submitted diagnosis of lumbar spondylosis (M47.816), which represents a different spinal region entirely. 1

---

Critical Documentation Deficiencies

Diagnosis-Procedure Mismatch

• The submitted primary diagnosis M47.816 (spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, LUMBAR region) does not support cervical/thoracic procedures (CPT 64633/64634). 1
• The procedure codes 64633/64634 specifically indicate cervical or thoracic facet joint denervation, yet the anatomic diagnosis submitted references the lumbar spine exclusively. 2
• While the clinical notes describe cervical pain and prior successful left cervical RFA C2-5, the formal diagnosis code submitted for authorization does not match this clinical picture. 1

Missing Cervical-Specific Diagnosis

• The authorization request lacks a cervical spondylosis diagnosis code (M47.812 or M47.811) that would correspond to the cervical procedure being requested. 2
• Previous authorizations in the patient's history show M47.812 (cervical spondylosis) was used for prior cervical RFA procedures, but this code was not submitted for the current request. 1
• The clinical documentation clearly describes cervical facet-mediated pain, but this is not reflected in the formal diagnosis codes submitted. 3

---

Insurance Criteria Analysis

Criteria Assessment Based on Available Documentation

The patient appears to meet most medical necessity criteria IF the correct cervical diagnosis were submitted: 2

1. Severe pain limiting ADLs for ≥6 months: APPEARS MET - Patient reports chronic cervical pain with functional limitations affecting work and daily activities. 4

2. No prior spinal fusion at the level to be treated: MET - No documentation of cervical fusion surgery; prior authorizations show only RFA procedures. 1

3. Neuroradiologic studies negative for disc herniation: APPEARS MET - The December 2023 cervical MRI shows only mild disc bulges at C4-5 and C5-6 without herniation, central stenosis, or foraminal stenosis. 4

4. No significant spinal canal narrowing or instability: APPEARS MET - MRI impression specifically states "no evidence of spinal stenosis or neural foraminal stenosis." 4

5. Six weeks of conservative treatment: APPEARS MET - Documentation indicates ongoing physical therapy, NSAIDs, pain creams, lidocaine patches, heat therapy, and stretching. 4, 2

6. Two positive diagnostic blocks with ≥80% relief: APPEARS MET - Patient had prior successful left cervical RFA C2-5 on a previous date with reported 70% improvement lasting >12 months, suggesting positive diagnostic blocks were performed previously. 2, 3

---

Evidence-Based Context for Cervical RFA

Diagnostic Accuracy

• Controlled diagnostic cervical facet joint nerve blocks have good evidence (Level II) with a prevalence of cervical facet pain ranging from 36% to 60% in chronic neck pain populations. 3
• The false-positive rate with single diagnostic blocks ranges from 27% to 63%, which is why controlled comparative blocks with ≥80% pain relief are the criterion standard. 3
• The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) provides Level II evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for cervical diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks. 2

Therapeutic Effectiveness

• For cervical radiofrequency ablation, the evidence is Level II with moderate strength of recommendation, showing long-term improvement. 2
• A retrospective case series of 63 cervical facet RFA patients showed 85% achieved at least 50% improvement, with excellent responders (≥70% improvement) maintaining benefit for an average of 10.8 months (range 3-34 months). 5
• Systematic reviews demonstrate moderate evidence for both short-term (<3 months) and long-term (≥3 months) pain relief with cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy. 6

Repeat Procedures

• Patients who respond well to initial RFA commonly require repeat procedures when pain returns, typically after 6-12 months. 5
• This patient's history of >12 months relief from prior cervical RFA with subsequent return of symptoms represents an appropriate clinical scenario for repeat intervention. 2, 5

---

Common Pitfalls in Authorization Requests

Documentation Errors to Avoid

• Always ensure diagnosis codes match the anatomic region of the requested procedure - submitting lumbar diagnoses for cervical procedures will result in automatic denial. 1
• Verify that all supporting documentation (clinical notes, imaging, prior procedure records) aligns with the formal diagnosis codes submitted. 2
• Include specific cervical spondylosis diagnosis codes (M47.812 for cervical region without myelopathy/radiculopathy) when requesting cervical procedures. 1

Clinical Documentation Requirements

• Document specific facet-mediated pain characteristics: axial neck pain worse with extension, rotation, or lateral bending; tenderness over facet joints; absence of radicular symptoms. 3
• Clearly state the results of prior diagnostic blocks, including percentage of pain relief and duration of relief, to establish the ≥80% relief criterion. 2, 3
• Specify conservative treatments attempted, duration of each treatment, and why they failed to provide adequate relief. 4, 2

---

Recommendation for Resubmission

To obtain authorization, the following must be corrected:

• Submit the correct cervical diagnosis code (M47.812 - Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region) instead of M47.816 (lumbar region). 1, 2
• Ensure all supporting documentation clearly describes cervical facet-mediated pain with appropriate imaging of the cervical spine. 4, 3
• Include documentation of prior positive diagnostic cervical medial branch blocks showing ≥80% pain relief for the expected duration of the local anesthetic used. 2, 3
• Verify that the procedure codes (64633 for single level, 64634 for each additional level) match the specific cervical levels to be treated (appears to be C2-5 based on clinical notes). 2