What medications can be used to treat non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pharmacological Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

For patients with biopsy-proven NASH without diabetes or cirrhosis, vitamin E (800 IU/day) is the first-line pharmacological treatment, achieving 43% histological improvement versus 19% with placebo. 1 For patients with biopsy-proven NASH regardless of diabetes status, pioglitazone (30 mg daily) is equally effective, achieving 47% NASH resolution versus 21% with placebo. 1, 2

Treatment Algorithm Based on Patient Characteristics

Non-Diabetic Patients with Biopsy-Proven NASH

Vitamin E (800 IU/day) should be the preferred agent, as it achieved the primary endpoint in the landmark PIVENS trial with 42% of patients showing histological improvement compared to 19% with placebo (P < 0.001, number needed to treat = 4.4). 1 This represents resolution of steatohepatitis with significant improvements in steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. 1, 2

  • Vitamin E demonstrated similar efficacy in children with NAFLD, achieving 58% NASH resolution versus 28% with placebo (P < 0.006). 1
  • Critical caveat: Vitamin E has been associated with increased all-cause mortality and excess hemorrhagic stroke and prostate cancer at high doses, requiring informed discussion with patients before initiation. 1
  • Vitamin E does not improve fibrosis. 1

Diabetic or Non-Diabetic Patients with Biopsy-Proven NASH

Pioglitazone 30 mg daily is the treatment of choice, particularly when diabetes coexists or when vitamin E is contraindicated. 1, 2 Pioglitazone achieved 47% NASH resolution versus 21% with placebo (P < 0.001) and demonstrated improvement across all histological parameters including potential fibrosis regression. 1

  • Five randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis confirm pioglitazone's efficacy, showing resolution of NASH (odds ratio 3.22; 95% CI 2.17-4.79; P < 0.001) and reversal of advanced fibrosis (odds ratio 3.15; 95% CI 1.25-7.93; P = 0.01). 1
  • Expected weight gain of 2.5-4.7 kg is the most common side effect, which can be mitigated through nutritional counseling or combination with SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists. 1
  • Contraindications include decompensated cirrhosis, congestive heart failure risk, and bladder cancer history. 1
  • Bone loss may occur in women treated with thiazolidinediones. 1

Lean Patients with Biopsy-Proven NASH

The same treatment principles apply: vitamin E for non-diabetics without cirrhosis, and pioglitazone 30 mg daily for those with or without diabetes but without cirrhosis. 1

Emerging Therapies with Strong Evidence

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Semaglutide represents the most promising emerging therapy, achieving 59% NASH resolution with the highest dose (0.4 mg/day) versus 17% with placebo (P < 0.001) in 320 patients with biopsy-proven NASH. 1, 2 This is the highest resolution rate among all tested pharmacotherapies. 2

  • Liraglutide demonstrated 39% NASH resolution versus 9% placebo in earlier trials, with reversal of steatohepatitis and amelioration of fibrosis progression after 12 months. 1, 3
  • The American Diabetes Association recommends prioritizing GLP-1 receptor agonists as first-line glucose-lowering agents for diabetic patients with NAFLD, combined with aggressive lifestyle intervention. 3
  • Dose-dependent gastrointestinal adverse effects (nausea, constipation, vomiting) occur more frequently than placebo. 1
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists have not been widely tested in decompensated cirrhosis and should be used cautiously in this setting. 1

Treatments WITHOUT Proven Efficacy

Metformin

Metformin should NOT be used to treat NASH, as it has no major effect on steatohepatitis or liver histology in randomized controlled trials. 1, 2, 4 However, metformin remains safe and effective for treating diabetes in patients with NAFLD when clinically indicated. 1

SGLT2 Inhibitors

SGLT2 inhibitors lack robust liver biopsy-proven histological improvement data and their therapeutic role in NAFLD is not fully defined. 1, 3 Randomized controlled trials with dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and empagliflozin reported approximately 20% placebo-subtracted reduction in steatosis by imaging, but effects on liver histology remain unknown. 1

  • SGLT2 inhibitors should be reserved for managing comorbid conditions (cardiovascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease) rather than as primary NAFLD therapy. 1, 3
  • They can be used safely in compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Class A or B) but must be avoided in decompensated cirrhosis. 3

Critical Prerequisites for Pharmacotherapy

Pharmacological treatment should be reserved exclusively for patients with biopsy-proven NASH, not for simple steatosis (NAFL). 1, 2 The distinction is critical because:

  • NAFL has negligible risk of progression and does not warrant pharmacotherapy. 1
  • NASH carries higher risk of cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma, justifying treatment risks. 1
  • Liver biopsy remains the reference standard when uncertainty exists regarding disease stage or contributing causes. 1

Mandatory Concurrent Interventions

All pharmacological interventions must be accompanied by lifestyle modifications targeting 7-10% weight loss through Mediterranean diet and 150-300 minutes weekly of moderate-intensity exercise. 3, 2 Weight loss of 3-5% improves steatosis, while 10% weight loss improves NASH histology. 1

Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Statins are safe in NAFLD and should be used for dyslipidemia management as clinically indicated, with beneficial effects including 37% reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma risk and 46% reduction in hepatic decompensation. 1, 3 Statins can be prescribed to patients with F2-F3 fibrosis and Child A or B cirrhosis but should be avoided in Child class C cirrhosis. 1

Monitoring and Follow-Up

Risk stratification using FIB-4 score should be performed at baseline, with values <1.3 indicating low risk, 1.3-2.67 indicating intermediate risk, and >2.67 indicating high risk requiring hepatology referral. 3 Noninvasive tests should be repeated at 6-month to 2-year intervals depending on fibrosis stage and treatment response. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pharmacotherapy for MASH/NASH

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of MASLD in Diabetic Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.